The Journal of Economics, Marketing and Management (융합경영연구)

International Convergence Management Association (국제융합경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Differential Impacts of Discretionary Accrual Directions on Accounting Conservatism

  • Sangkwon CHA (The Department of Global Cultural Management, Calvin University) ;
  • HyeongTae CHO (College of Business Administration, Hongik University)
  • Received : 2024.04.24
  • Accepted : 2024.06.05
  • Published : 2024.06.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: While there has been extensive research on discretionary accruals (hereafter, 'DA') and accounting conservatism, interpretations have varied among researchers depending on how discretionary accruals are determined as proxies. This study investigates the relationship between discretionary accruals (DA) and accounting conservatism, focusing on the distinctions between signed DA and absolute DA. Research design, data and methodology: Using financial data from companies listed on the KOSPI and KOSDAQ markets from 2010 to 2020, we employ regression analysis to explore how signed and absolute DA impact accounting conservatism. This approach allows us to parse out the effects of positive versus negative discretionary accruals systematically. Results: Our findings indicate a divergent impact of DA on accounting conservatism. Specifically, in cases of negative DA, an increase in DA corresponds with heightened accounting conservatism. Conversely, when DA is positive, increases in DA do not exhibit a significant relationship with changes in accounting conservatism. These effects suggest that the nature of DA-whether it represents upward or downward earnings adjustments-critically influences its relationship with conservatism. Conclusions: The results elucidate the nuanced role of discretionary accruals in influencing accounting conservatism. The decrease in accounting conservatism associated with absolute increases in DA appears primarily driven by groups with downward earnings adjustments. This suggests that as negative DA diminishes toward zero, accounting conservatism intensifies, whereas positive DA does not have a parallel effect.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. 2007. Accounting conservatism and board of director characteristics: An empirical analysis. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 43(2-3): 411-437.
  2. Ahmed, A. S., & Duellman, S. 2013. Managerial overconfidence and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 51(1): 1-30.
  3. Ball, R., and Shivakumar, L. 2005. Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1): 83-128.
  4. Basu, S. 1997. The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earning. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(1): 3-37.
  5. Biddle, G. C., Ma, M. L., and Song, F. M. 2011. Accounting Conservatism and Bankruptcy Risk. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 37(2): 295-323
  6. Bushhan, R. 1989. Firm characteristics and analyst following. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 11(2-3): 255-274.
  7. Cha, S K., & Park, M. H. (2021). Type of Listed Market and Accounting Conservatism, Korean International Accounting Review, 99(0): 283-309.
  8. Cha, S. K., & Kim, E. G. (2021b). Foreign Investors Ownerships and Conditional Conservatism, Korean International Accounting Review, 98(0), 115-135.
  9. Cha, S. K. (2021). Financial Constraint and Conditional Conservatism, The Journal of Eurasian Studies, 18(2), 159-183.
  10. Cha, S. K., & Kim, E. G. (2021a). Discretionary Revenue and Conditional Conservatism, Journal of Taxation and Accounting, 22(2), 9-37.
  11. Chae, S. J., & Hwang, H. J. (2017). The Effect of Audit Quality on Crash Risk: Focusing on Distribution & Service Companies, Journal of Distribution Science, 15(8): 47-54. DOI: 10.15722/jds.15.8.201708.47
  12. Cho, T. H., & Kim, B. H. (2016). Audit Market Concentration and Audit Quality: Focused on the Biggest Industry-Market-Share Auditors, Study on Accounting, Taxation & Auditing, 58(4): 35-86.
  13. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. 1995. Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2): 193-225.
  14. Dye, R. A. 1985. Strategic accounting choice and the effects of alternative financial reporting requirements. Journal of Accounting Research, 23(2): 544-574.
  15. Fields, T. D., Lys, T. Z., and Vincent, L. 2001. Empirical research on accounting choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1-3): 255-307.
  16. Han, J. H., & Moon, S. H. (2009). Auditor Rotation and Conservatism, Korean International Accounting Review, 27(0), 141-161.
  17. Healy, P. M. 1985. The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1-3): 85-107.
  18. Holthausen, R. W., and Leftwich, R. W. 1983. The economic consequences of accounting choice implications of costly contracting and monitoring. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5: 77-117.
  19. Hsu, C., Novoselov, K. E., and Wang, R. 2017. Does accounting conservatism mitigate the shortcomings of CEO overconfidence? The Accounting Review, 92(6): 77-101.
  20. Hwang, Y. S., Lee, W. J., Nam, H. J., & Park, K. H. (2008). Conditional Conservatism, Listing Status, and Auditor Quality, Korean Accounting Review, 33(2), 145-183.
  21. Jung, S. W. (2003). Factors Associated with Analyst Following and Forecast Characteristics, Korean Accounting Review, 28(4), 61-84.
  22. Khan, M., & Watts, R. L. 2009. Estimation and empirical properties of a firm-year measure of accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 48(2-3): 132-150.
  23. Kim, B. Y., & Park, H. J. (2014). The Impact of Accounting Conservatism and Foreign Ownership on Agency Costs, Korean Accounting Journal, 23(5), 145-175.
  24. Kim, J. B., & Zhang, L. 2016. Accounting conservatism and stock price crash risk: Firm-level evidence. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1): 412-441.
  25. Kim, J. G., Yoo, S. M., & Kim, K. O. (2011). The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management, Korean International Accounting Review, 38(0), 43-74.
  26. Kim, J. H., Shin, H. H., & Chang, J. H. (2003). Determinants of Analysts Following: Using the IBES Database, Korean Accounting Review, 28(3), 31-54.
  27. Kim, J. O., & Bae, G. S. (2006). The Role of Corporate Governance to Conservatism, Korean Accounting Review, 31(1), 69-96.
  28. Kim, S. R. N., Yang, D. H., & Cho, K. H. (2011). The Impact of the Agency Cost on Accounting Conservatism, Korean Accounting Review, 36(3), 65-102.
  29. Kim, T, W, Chun, H. S., & Kwon, Y. D. (2011). Market Anomaly of Audit Quality, Conservatism and Accounting Accruals, Korean International Accounting Review, 36(0): 115-142
  30. Kothari, S. P., Leone, A. J., and Wasley, C. E. 2005. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39(1): 163-197.
  31. Kwon, S. Y., Shin, H. G, & Jeong, J. Y. (2006). The Effect of Audit Hours and Audit Fees on Earnings Management. Korean Accounting Review, 31(4), 175-201.
  32. LaFond, R., & Roychowdhury, S. 2008. Managerial ownership and accounting conservatism. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(1): 101-135.
  33. Lee, K. B., & Lee, M. H. (2007). A Study on the Relationship between Conservatism and Earning Management, Korean International Accounting Review, 20(0), 75-101.
  34. Lee, K. B., Ji, S. H., & Ryu, Y. L. (2012). The Relevance between Firm's Governance and Conservatism in Accounting: According to Audit Quality, Korean Accounting Information Review, 30(3), 153-182.
  35. Li, H., 2019. Conservatism, Earnings Management and R&D Capitalization. International Journal of Financial Research, 10(2): 52-60.
  36. Marston, C. 1997. Firm characteristics and analyst following in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 29(4): 335-347.
  37. Mun, T. H. (2017). A Study on Audit Times for Each Position and Audit Quality, Korean Accounting Information Review, 35(4): 111-129.
  38. Paek, W. S., & Yoo, J. K. (2005). Types of Auditors and Conservatism, Study on Accounting, Taxation & Auditing, 41(0), 241-260.
  39. Paek, W. S. 2020. Timing Role of Accruals and Conservatism, Korean Accounting Review, 45(4), 1-39.
  40. Park, K. Y. (2017). Game-theoretical Analysis about Firm's Disclosure of Bad News, International Economic Journal, 23(2), 83-108.
  41. Park, S. B., & Ra, K. R. (2013). The Relationship between Earnings Management and Conservatism -Focused on Earnings Loss Avoidance Firms and Big-bath Firms-, Management & Information Systems Review, 32(5), 261-285. DOI: 10.29214/damis.2013.32.5.013
  42. Park, J. I., & Jeon, K. A. (2018). A Reexamination of Abnormal Audit Fees or Audit Hours and Audit Quality-New Data and New Evidence-, Journal of Taxation and Accounting, 19(5), 9-53.
  43. Penman, S. H., & Zhang, X. J. 2002. Accounting conservatism, the quality of earnings, and stock returns. The Accounting Review, 77(2): 237-264.
  44. Ruch, G. W., & Taylor, G. 2015. Accounting conservatism: A review of the literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 34(1): 17-38.
  45. Stubben, S. R. (2010). Discretionary revenues as a measure of earnings management. The accounting review, 85(2), 695-717.
  46. Watts, R. L. 1992. Accounting choice theory and market-based research in accounting, The British Accounting Review, 24(3): 235-267.
  47. Watts, R. L. 2003. Conservatism in accounting part I: Explanations and implications. Accounting Horizons, 17(3): 207-221.
  48. Yang, D. C., & Ki, D. H. (2014). The Effect of Ownership and Board Structure of Employed Manager's Firms on Conservatism, Korean Business Education Review, 29(2), 368-393.
  49. Zimmerman, J. L. 1983. Taxes and Firm Size. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 5: 119-149.