Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the Korea Education and Research Information Service.
References
- Ball, L., Drijvers, P., Ladel, S., Siller, H. S., Tabach, M., & Vale, C. (2018). Uses of technology in primary and secondary mathematics education: Tools, topics and trends. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76575-4
- Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research-A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255-273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004
- Chang, H., & Nam, J. (2021). The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Elementary Mathematics Education: Focusing on the math class support system "Knock-knock! Math Expedition". The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 31, 105-123. https://doi.org/10.20972/kjee.31..202101.105
- Chocarro, R., Cortinas, M., & Marcos-Matas, G. (2023). Teachers' attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users' characteristics. Educational Studies, 49(2), 295-313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426
- Choi, S. Y. (2022). Development of an instructional design model for elementary mathematics classes based on an artificial intelligence education system [Master's thesis, Seoul National University].
- Choi, S., Jang, Y., & Kim, H. (2023). Influence of pedagogical beliefs and perceived trust on teachers' acceptance of educational artificial intelligence tools. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 39(4), 910-922. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2049145
- Davis, F. D. (1986). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results [Doctoral dissertation, MIT Sloan School of Management].
- Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
- Gefen, D., Rigdon, E. E., & Straub, D. (2011). Editor's comments: An update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, 35(2), iii-xiv. https://doi.org/10.2307/23044042
- Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. C. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1-79. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.00407
- Granic, A., & Marangunic, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572-2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864
- Gurer, M. D., & Akkaya, R. (2022). The influence of pedagogical beliefs on technology acceptance: a structural equation modeling study of pre-service mathematics teachers. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 25(4), 479-495. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-021-09504-5
- Higgins, K., Huscroft-D'Angelo, J., & Crawford, L. (2019). Effects of technology in mathematics on achievement, motivation, and attitude: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(2), 283-319. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117748416
- Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://doi.org/10.58863/20.500.12424/4276068
- Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
- Ibili, E., Resnyansky, D., & Billinghurst, M. (2019). Applying the technology acceptance model to understand maths teachers' perceptions towards an augmented reality tutoring system. Education and Information Technologies, 24, 2653-2675. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09925-z
- Jeong, Y., Tak, B., Lim, M., & Kim, K. (2022). A study on advancement of elementary mathematics supporting system using artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. Ministry of Education.
- Joubert, J., Callaghan, R., & Engelbrecht, J. (2020). Lesson study in a blended approach to support isolated teachers in teaching with technology. ZDM Mathematics Education 52, 907-925. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01161-x
- Kim, H. (2017). Theoretical perspectives on the age of artificial intelligence. Society and Theory, 31, 41-62. https://doi.org/10.17209/st.2017.11.31.41
- Kim, H., Gye, B., Lee, J., Lim, W., & Choi, I. (2018). Transforming mathematics education through information technology. Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity.
- Kim, J. W., Kwon, M., & Pang, J. S. (2023). Elementary school teachers' perceptions of using artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Education of Primary School Mathematics, 26(4), 299-316. https://doi.org/10.7468/JKSMEC.2023.26.4.299
- Kim, S., & Cho, M. (2022). AI-based educational platform analysis supporting personalized mathematics learning. Communications of Mathematical Education, 36(3), 417-438. http://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2022.36.3.417
- Kline, R. B. (2015). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford publications.
- Ko, E., & Han, K. (2023). The effect of the elementary school 'Smart Mathematics Exploration Team' support system on mathematical academic achievement and mathematical attitude. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 27(3),235-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2023.27.3.235
- Lee, K., Kim, D., Kim, S., Kim, H., Kim, H., Park, J., Lee, H., Lee, H., Lim, H., Jang, J., Jung, J., Jo, S., Choi, I., & Song, C. (2021). A study on how to organize future-oriented math curriculum in preparation for post-COVID-19. Ministry of Education.
- Lim, M., Kim, H., Nam, J., & Hong, O. (2021). Exploring the application of elementary mathematics supporting system suing artificial intelligence in teaching and learning. School Mathematics, 23(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.29275/sm.2021.06.23.2.251
- Mailizar, M., Burg, D., & Maulina, S. (2021). Examining university students' behavioural intention to use e-learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: An extended TAM model. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7057-7077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10557-5
- Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57(3), 519-530. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/57.3.519
- Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics Curriculum. 2022-33(Book 8).
- Moden, M., Tallvid, M., Lundin, J., & Lindstrom, B. (2021). Intelligent tutoring system: Why teachers abandoned a technology aimed at automating teaching processes. In B. Tung (Ed.), Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (pp. 1538-1547). HICSS Conference Office. https://doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.186
- Montebello, M. (2018). AI injected e-learning: The future of online education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67928-0
- Mueller, J., Wood, E., Willoughby, T., Ross, C., & Specht, J. (2008). Identifying discriminating variables between teachers who fully integrate computers and teachers with limited integration. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1523-1537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.02.003
- Onal, N. (2017). Use of interactive whiteboard in the mathematics classroom: Students' perceptions within the framework of the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1045a
- Park, M. (2020). Applications and possibilities of artificial intelligence in mathematics education. Communications of Mathematical Education, 34(4), 545-561. https://doi.org/10.7468/jksmee.2020.34.4.545
- Perienen, A. (2020). Frameworks for ICT integration in mathematics education-A teacher's perspective. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(6), em1845. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/7803
- Peters, M. A., Jackson, L., Papastephanou, M., Jandric, P., Lazaroiu, G., Evers, C. W., Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., Araya, D., Tesar, M., Mika, C., Chen, L., Wang, C., Sturm, S., Rider, S., & Fuller, S. (2023). AI and the future of humanity: ChatGPT-4, philosophy and education - Critical responses, Educational Philosophy and Theory, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2023.2213437
- Phillips, A., Pane, J. F., Reumann-Moore, R., & Shenbanjo, O. (2020). Implementing an adaptive intelligent tutoring system as an instructional supplement. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 1409-1437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09745-w
- Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. Routledge.
- Rosseel, Y. (2012). Lavaan: An R package for structural equation. Journal of Statistical Software, 48(2), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610904
- Seufert, S., Guggemos, J., & Sailer, M. (2021). Technology-related knowledge, skills, and attitudes of pre-and in-service teachers: The current situation and emerging trends. Computers in Human Behavior, 115, 106552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106552
- Shin, D. (2020). Artificial intelligence in primary and secondary education: A systematic review. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 30(3), 531-552. https://doi.org/10.29275/jerm.2020.08.30.3.531
- Shin, D. (2021). Teaching mathematics integrating intelligent tutoring system: Investigating prospective teachers' concerns and TPACK. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 20(8), 1659-1676. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-021-10221-x
- Shin, D. (2022). Mathematics teachers' professional development through artificial intelligence. Journal for Philosophy of Mathematics Education, 4(1), 33-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.23027/JPME.2022.4.1.3
- Son, T. (2023). Preservice teacher's understanding of the intention to use the artificial intelligence program 'Knock-Knock! Mathematics Expedition' in mathematics lesson: Focusing on self-efficacy, artificial intelligence anxiety, and technology acceptance model. The Mathematical Education, 62(3), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.7468/mathedu.2023.62.3.401
- Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 561-570. https://doi.org/10.2307/249633
- Teo, T. (2009). Modelling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(2), 302-312. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
- Teo, T., & Milutinovic, V. (2015). Modelling the intention to use technology for teaching mathematics among pre-service teachers in Serbia. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 363-380. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1668
- Teo, T., Ursavas, O. F., & Bahcekapili, E. (2012). An assessment of pre-service teachers' technology acceptance in Turkey: A structural equation modeling approach. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 21(1), 191-202.
- Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425-478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540
- Yeo, S., Rutherford, T., & Campbell, T. (2022). Understanding elementary mathematics teachers' intention to use a digital game through the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11515-11536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11073-w
- Yim, Y., Ahn, S., Kim, K. M., Kim, J. H., & Hong, O. (2021). The effects of an AI-based class support system on student learning: focusing on the case of toctoc math expedition in Korea. The Journal of Korea Elementary Education, 32(4), 61-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.20972/kjee.32.4.202112.61
- Yoo, Y. K., & Chung, J. Y. (2024). An analysis on secondary mathematics teachers' perceptions of ai-convergence education. The Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 24(2), 139-156. https://doi.org/10.22251/jlcci.2024.24.2.139
- Young, J. R. (2016). Unpacking TPACK in mathematics education research: A systematic review of meta-analyses. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 2(1), 19-29. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.2.1.19
- Zawacki-Richter, O., Marin, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education-where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0