DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Factors Influencing Resistance to the Metaverse: Focusing on Propagation Mechanisms

  • Mina Lee (Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Kookmin University) ;
  • Minjung Kim (Department of Advertising & Public Relations, Dongeui University)
  • Received : 2024.03.02
  • Accepted : 2024.05.29
  • Published : 2024.06.30

Abstract

This study examines factors influencing nonusers' resistance to the adoption of the metaverse, focusing on propagation mechanisms. It elucidates the role of innovation resistance within the metaverse adoption process. We applied the Innovation Resistance Model in the context of the metaverse and considers three major groups of factors influencing resistance to the metaverse: innovation characteristics (perceived usefulness, compatibility, perceived risk, and complexity), consumer characteristics (personal innovativeness), and propagation mechanisms (mass media, online media, and personal communication). An online survey of college students who do not use the metaverse revealed that perceived usefulness, compatibility, personal innovativeness, and online media were negative predictors of resistance to the metaverse. Conversely, perceived risk, mass media, and personal communication were positive predictors of resistance to the metaverse. Furthermore, innovation resistance was found to play a mediating role in the metaverse adoption process. Drawing upon the findings, we suggested marketing strategies to decrease resistance to the metaverse.

Keywords

References

  1. A. Davis, D. M. John, O. Dawn, K. Deepak, and Z. Ilze, "Avatars, People, and Virtual Worlds: Foundations for Research in Metaverses," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 90-117, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00183 
  2. N. Stephenson, Snow Crash, Bantam Books, 1992. 
  3. Enewstoday, Enactment of the World's First 'Metaverse Industry Promotion Act'... Effective at the End of August, 2024. https://www.enewstoday.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=2092550. 
  4. Newsis, Sookmyung Women's University Freshmen Experience Campus through 'Snow Bus,' 2024. https://www.newsis.com/view/?id=NISX20240220_0002633125&cID=10201&pID=10200. 
  5. Geumgang Ilbo, [College Entrance Examination] Soonchunhyang University, 'the Center of the Metaverse Craze'... Leading the Innovative Education Platform, 2023. https://www.ggilbo.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=989936. 
  6. McKinsey & Company, Value Creation in the Metaverse, 2022. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/business%20functions/marketing%20and%20sales/our%20insights/value%20creation%20in%20the%20metaverse/Value-creation-in-the-metaverse.pdf. 
  7. Kyunghyang Newspaper, A Local Government Metaverse Platform that Has Been in the Virtual Reality Craz e... Citizens Turn Away, 2024. https://www.khan.co.kr/national/national-general/article/202402201611001. 
  8. Chosun Biz, I Thought It Was a Virtual Paradise... KT.LGU+ Metaverse Utilization Declines, 2023. https://biz.chosun.com/it-science/ict/2023/04/19/HYXA27N64NEJVJKWDZ3ICRLD7M/. 
  9. News1, A Metaverse that Feeds on the Future?... How Is It Different from Games? 'Skepticism,' 2022. https://www.news1.kr/articles/?4586745 
  10. J. Oh, "A Study on Factors Affecting the Intention to Use the Metaverse by Applying the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (ETAM): Focused on the Virtual World Metaverse," The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 21, No. 10, pp. 204-216, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2021.21.10.204 
  11. S. Park and Y. J. Kang, "A Study on the Intentions of Early Users of Metaverse Platforms Using the Technology Acceptance Model," Journal of Digital Convergence, Vol. 19, No. 10, pp. 275-285, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.20 21.19.10.275 
  12. S. Kang, "A Study on the Factors Affecting the Usage Intention of the Metaverse in the Digital Convergence Age," The Journal of Internet Electronic Commerce Research, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 171-188, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37272/JIECR.2021.12.21.6.171 
  13. H. Oh and Y. Lee, "Factors Affecting Innovation Resistance on Metaverse Platform," Cartoon & Animation Studies, No. 70, pp. 481-513, 2023. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7230/KOSCAS.2023.70.481 
  14. M. Kim and M. Lee, "A Study on the Factors Influencing the Intention to Use the Metaverse: Focusing on Innovation Resistance Model," The Journal of The Institute of Internet, Broadcasting and Communication, Vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 51-58, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7236/JIIBC.2023.23.1.51 
  15. E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations (5th Ed.), New York, NY: Free Press, 2003. 
  16. F. D. Davis, "Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 319-340, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/249008 
  17. S. Ram, "A Model of Innovation Resistance," Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp. 208-212, 1987. 
  18. J. N. Sheth, "Psychology of Innovation Resistance: The Less Developed Concept (LDC) in Diffusion Research," Research in Marketing, Vol. 4, pp. 273-282, 1981. 
  19. S. Ram and J. N. Sheth, "Consumer Resistance to Innovations: The Marketing Problem and Its Solutions," Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 5-14, 1989. 
  20. D. Huang, X. Jin, and A. Coghlan, "Advances in Consumer Innovation Resistance Research: A Review and Research Agenda," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Vol. 166, pp. 120594, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120594 
  21. H. Kim, H. Choi, S. Kim, M. An, and Y. Lee, "A Study of Innovation Resistance among Social Media Non - Users," Asian Communication Research, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 439-482, 2012. 
  22. B. Park, "Integrative Adoption Model of New Media (IAM-NM)," Asian Communication Research, Vol. 55, No. 5, pp. 448-497, 2011. 
  23. J. Shin and S. Lee, "A Study of Intention to Use Wrist-Worn Wearable Devices Based on Innovation Resistance Model - Focusing on the Relationship between Innovation Characteristics, Consumer Characteristics, and Innovation Resistance," The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.16, No. 6, pp. 123-134, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2016.16.06.123 
  24. S. Shin and J. Park, "A Study on Innovation Resistance and Acceptance Intention of YouTube: Focusing on Personality Traits and Innovation Characteristics," Journal of Cybercommunication Academic Society, Vol. 38, No. 3, pp. 47-91, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36494/JCAS.2021.09.38.3.47. 
  25. H. Kim and S. Kim, "A Study of Determinants to Intend to Resist and to Continue to Use of YouTube," Korean Journal of Communication Studies, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 117-145, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23875/kca.30.3.5 
  26. S. Yun, "A Study of Integrative Adoption Model regarding Social TV," Journal of Communication Science, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 145-183, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.14696/jcs.2016.06.16.2.145 
  27. S. Yoon, M. Kim, and J. Choi, "Effects of Innovation Characteristics and User Characteristics on the Adopting e-Books: Focused on Innovation Resistance Model," The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol. 14, No. 8, pp. 61-73, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2014.14.08.061 
  28. H. Lee and M. Yi, "Factors Affecting the Innovation Resistance of People Refusing to Use the Metaverse," Korean Journal of Broadcasting and Telecommunication Studies, Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 154-190, 2023. 
  29. R. Agarwal and E. Karahanna, "Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs about Information Technology Usage," MIS quarterly, pp. 665-694, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951 
  30. J. Y. Thong, S. J. Hong, and K. Y. Tam, "The Effects of Post-Adoption Beliefs on the Expectation-Confirmation Model for Information Technology Continuance," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64, No. 9, pp. 799-810, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.05.001 
  31. S. Min, K. K. F. So, and M. Jeong, "Consumer Adoption of the Uber Mobile Application: Insights from Diffusion of Innovation Theory and Technology Acceptance Model," Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, Vol. 36, No. 7, pp. 770-783, 2019.
  32. H. Wang and S. Wang, "Predicting Mobile Hotel Reservation Adoption: Insight from a Perceived Value Standpoint," International Journal of Hospitality Management, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 598-608, 2010. 
  33. V. Venkatesh and F. D. Davis, "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926 
  34. E. Sedlander and R. N. Rimal, "Beyond Individual-Level Theorizing in Social Norms Research: How Collective Norms and Media Access Affect Adolescents' Use of Contraception," Journal of Adolescent Health, Vol. 64, No. 4, pp. S31-S36, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.12.020 
  35. K. Real and R. N. Rimal, "Friends Talk to Friends About Drinking: Exploring the Role of Peer Communication in the Theory of Normative Social Behavior," Health Communication, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 169-180, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230701454254 
  36. H. W. Kim and A. Kankanhalli, "Investigating User Resistance to Information Systems Implementation: A Status Quo Bias Perspective," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 567-582, 2009.
  37. J. W. Moon and Y. G. Kim, "Extending the TAM for A World-Wide-Web Context," Information & Management, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 217-230, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-7206(00)00061-6 
  38. J. Yu, H. Lee, I. Ha, and H. Zo, "User Acceptance of Media Tablets: An Empirical Examination of Perceived Value," Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 206-223, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.004 
  39. A. F. Hayes, Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach, Second Edition, NY: The Guilford Press, 2017. 
  40. M. Kleijnen, N. Lee, and M. Wetzels, "An Exploration of Consumer Resistance to Innovation and Its Antecedents," Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 344-357, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.004