한국문헌정보학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science)

한국문헌정보학회 (Korean Society For Library And Information Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

다양성 지수를 활용한 학술지 편집위원과 저자의 국적 다양성 분석 - 문헌정보학 분야 국제학술지를 중심으로 -

An Analysis of Nationality Diversity by Journal Editors and Authors Using Diversity Index: Focusing on International Journals of Library and Information Science

  • 조재인 (인천대학교 문헌정보학과 /사회과학연구원)
  • 투고 : 2024.04.22
  • 심사 : 2024.05.07
  • 발행 : 2024.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 JCR에 등재된 문헌정보학 분야 국제학술지를 중심으로 학술지 편집위원과 저자의 국적 다양성을 분석하고 Simpson 다양성 지수(Simpson's Diversity Index)를 통해 계량화하였다. 더불어 편집위원 국적 다양성이 저자의 국적 다양성을 유도할 수 있는지 확인하고, 학술지의 특성에 따라 다양성 지수에 차이가 나타나는지 검증하였다. 분석 결과, 첫 번째, LIS 국제 학술지의 편집위원 국적 다양성 지수는 0.64로 0.76인 저자 국적 다양성에 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났으며, 편집위원과 저자의 국적 다양성은 높은 상관계수를 보이는 것으로 확인되었다(r = 0.79). 두 번째, IS(Information Science) 분야 저널은 편집위원과 저자 기여국에서 모두 0.8 전후의 높은 다양성이 나타났으나 LS(Library Science) 분야는 상대적으로 저조하며 특히 편집위원 다양성에서 0.48의 낮은 지수가 나타났다. 세 번째, 미국은 저자와 편집위원 모두 가장 높은 점유율을 나타내고 있으며, 특히 LS 분야 편집위원에서 53.39%의 압도적 점유를 보이는 것으로 확인되었다. 반면 한국을 포함한 아시아 국가는 저자에 비해 편집위원으로서 기여하는 비율이 미국과 유럽 국가에 비해 낮은 것으로 나타났다.

This study analyzed the national diversity of journal editors and authors, focusing on international journals in library and information science, and quantified it through Simpson's Diversity Index. In addition, LIS journals were clustered according to diversity indicators and their characteristics were analyzed, and it was also confirmed whether nationality diversity of editorial members could induce nationality diversity of authors. As a result of the analysis, first, the diversity index of the editors of the LIS (Library & Information Science) international journal was found to be 0.64, which is less than the diversity of the authors, which is 0.76. It was confirmed that as the diversity of nationalities among editorial committee members increases, it is possible to attract authors of various nationalities (r = .79). Second, journals in the IS (Information Science) field showed a high index before or after 0.8 for both editorial members and author contributing countries, but those in the LS (Library Science) field showed relatively low scores, especially among the editorial members, with a very low index of 0.48. Third, the United States has the highest share of both authors and editors, and in particular, it has been confirmed that the LS field has an overwhelming share of 53.39% of editors. On the other hand, in Asian countries, including Korea, the ratio of contributions as editors compared to contributions as authors was found to be lower than in the United States and European countries.

키워드

과제정보

본 연구는 인천대학교 우수 연구소 집단 연구 지원 사업(2022)으로 수행되었음.

참고문헌

  1. Chae, Hee-won & Shin, Jeong-yeop (2015). Exploration of changes in social diversity in Seoul metropolitan region. Journal of the Association of Korean Geographers, 4(1), 139-154.  https://doi.org/10.25202/JAKG.4.1.9
  2. Kim, Hyeon Cheol & An, Young Soo (2019). A monitoring the dynamic change of Seoul's side street trade areas using density and diversity of stores. Seoul Studies, 20(4), 149-170. https://doi.org/10.23129/seouls.20.4.201912.149 
  3. Kim, Jeong-in (2019). A study on the diversity and representation of local councilors according to changes in population composition: focusing on local councilors in Gyeonggi-do. Korean Public Management Review, 33(4), 101-126. https://doi.org/101-126.10.24210/kapm.2019.33.4.005 
  4. Lee, Jaeyoon (2021). Analysis of multidisciplinarity and interdisciplinarity of KCI humanities and social science journals: focusing on general and other fields. Journal of Information Management, 38(2), 227-250. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2021.38.2.227 
  5. Lee, Jimin (2022). Social diversity analysis of rural areas with statistical data - a case study of Gyeongsangnam province. Rural Planning, 28(3), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2022.28.3.073 
  6. Lee, Kyung Il, Jeon, Seongwoo, & Jang, Raeik (2018). Assessment and comparison of biodiversity by analysis unit using biodiversity index. Korean Environmental Policy Society Conference Proceedings, 109-110. 
  7. Lee, Min-Kyu & Min, Byeong-hyun (2014). Study on diversity in international news of South Korean weekly magazines: analysis of cover stories utilizing simpson's diversity index. Media and Performing Arts Research, 9(3), 281-312.
  8. Abrizah, A., Noorhidawati, A., & Zainab, A. N. (2015). LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: a stated preference study. Scientometrics, 102, 1083-1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1492-3 
  9. Akca, S. & Senyurt, O. (2023). Geographical representation of editorial boards: a review in the field of library and information sciences. Scientometrics, 128, 1409-1427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04614-0 
  10. Araujo, R. & Shideler, G. (2019). Cultural and geographical representation in the editorial boards of aquatic science journals. Science Editor, 42, 120-123. 
  11. Araujo, R. J., Shideler, G. S., & Reamer, M. B. (2021). Chief editors in aquatic science and communication are more likely to oversee editorial boards from their own regions. Learned Publishing, 34(4), 547-557. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1393 
  12. Bedeian, A. G., Van Fleet, D. D., & Hyman, H. H. (2009). Scientific achievement and editorial board membership. Organizational Research Methods, 12(2), 211. 
  13. Brinn, T. & Jones, M. J. (2007). Editorial boards in accounting: the power and the glory. Accounting Forum, 31, 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2006.08.001 
  14. Cabanac, G. (2012). Shaping the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: a scientometric study of 77 leading journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 977-996. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22609 
  15. Cho, J. (2024). The effect East Asian researcher's academic performance on international journal review and editing activities. Scientometrics, 129, 1825-1839. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-023-04918-9 
  16. Crook, C., Rivera Mindt, M., Hilsabeck, R., Olsen, J., Savin, M., & Suchy, Y. (2019). Advancing science through diversity and inclusion in the editorial process: a case study, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 34(7), 1286, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acz029.53 
  17. Ganter S. A. & Ortega F. (2019). The invisibility of Latin American scholarship in European media and communication studies: Challenges and opportunities of de-westernization and academic cosmopolitanism. International Journal of Communication, 13, 68-91. 
  18. Garcia-Carpintero, E., Granadino, B., & Plaza, L. M. (2010). The representation of nationalities on the editorial boards of international journals and the promotion of the scientific output of the same countries. Scientometrics, 84(3), 799-811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0199-3 
  19. Goyanes, M. & Demeter, M. (2020). How the geographic diversity of editorial boards affects what is published in JCR-ranked communication journals. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1123-1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020904169 
  20. Harzing, A. W. & Metz, I. (2013). Practicing what we preach. Management International Review, 53, 169-187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0124-x 
  21. Huang, M. H., Shaw, W. C., & Lin, C. S. (2019. One category, two communities: Subfield differences in "Information Science and Library Science" in Journal Citation Reports, Scientometrics, 119(2), 1059-1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03074-3 
  22. Huang, M., Chang, H., & Chen, D. (2012). The trend of concentration in scientific research and technological innovation: a reduction of the predominant role of the U.S. in world research & technology. Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), 457-468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.03.003 
  23. Ni, C. & Ding, Y. (2011). Journal clustering through interlocking editorship information. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504701202 
  24. Ni, C., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2013). Visualizing and comparing four facets of scholarly communication: producers, artifacts, concepts, and gatekeepers. Scientometrics, 94, 1161-1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0849-8 
  25. Palser, E. R., Lazerwitz, M., & Fotopoulou, A. (2021). Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.431321 
  26. Simpson, E. (1949). Measurement of diversity. Nature, 163, 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0 
  27. Uzun, A. (2004). Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns: the case of major journals in information science, and scientometrics. Scientometrics, 61, 457-465. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SCIE.0000045121.26810.35 
  28. Willett, P. (2013). The characteristics of journal editorial boards in library and information science. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology, 3(1), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.5865/IJKCT.2013.3.1.005 
  29. Wu, D., Lu, X., Li, J., & Li, J. (2020). Does the institutional diversity of editorial boards increase journal quality? The case economics field. Scientometrics, 124, 1579-1597. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03505-6 
  30. Xie, Y., Wu, Q., Zhang, P., & Li, X. (2020). Information Science and Library Science (IS-LS) journal subject categorization and comparison based on editorship information. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101069 
  31. Yip, S. W. & Rashid, M. A. (2021). Editorial diversity in medical education journals. The Clinical Teacher, 18, 523-528. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13386 
  32. Youk, S. & Park, H. S. (2019). Where and what do they publish? Editors' and editorial board members' affiliated institutions and the citation counts of their endogenous publications in the field of communication. Scientometrics, 120, 1237-1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03169-x