참고문헌
- Matalliotakis IM, Kourtis AI, Panidis DK. Adenomyosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2003;30:63-82
- Habiba M, Benagiano G. Classifying adenomyosis: progress and challenges. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2021;18:12386
- Tamai K, Togashi K, Ito T, Morisawa N, Fujiwara T, Koyama T. MR imaging findings of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathologic features and diagnostic pitfalls. Radiographics 2005;25:21-40
- Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R, et al. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 1996;199:151-158
- Novellas S, Chassang M, Delotte J, Toullalan O, Chevallier A, Bouaziz J, et al. MRI characteristics of the uterine junctional zone: from normal to the diagnosis of adenomyosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1206-1213
- Zhang M, Bazot M, Tsatoumas M, Munro MG, Reinhold C. MRI of adenomyosis: where are we today? Can Assoc Radiol J 2023;74:58-68
- Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K. Adenomyosis: usual and unusual imaging manifestations, pitfalls, and problemsolving MR imaging techniques. Radiographics 2011;31:99-115
- Zhai J, Vannuccini S, Petraglia F, Giudice LC. Adenomyosis: mechanisms and pathogenesis. Semin Reprod Med 2020;38:129-143
- Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM, et al. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Hum Reprod 2001;16:2427-2433
- Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2001;76:588-594
- Gordts S, Brosens JJ, Fusi L, Benagiano G, Brosens I. Uterine adenomyosis: a need for uniform terminology and consensus classification. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;17:244-248
- Valentini AL, Speca S, Gui B, Soglia G, Micco M, Bonomo L. Adenomyosis: from the sign to the diagnosis. Imaging, diagnostic pitfalls and differential diagnosis: a pictorial review. Radiol Med 2011;116:1267-1287
- Thoeny HC, Forstner R, De Keyzer F. Genitourinary applications of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the pelvis. Radiology 2012;263:326-342
- Rees CO, Nederend J, Mischi M, van Vliet HAAM, Schoot BC. Objective measures of adenomyosis on MRI and their diagnostic accuracy-a systematic review & meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2021;100:1377-1391
- Kilickesmez O, Bayramoglu S, Inci E, Cimilli T, Kayhan A. Quantitative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of normal and diseased uterine zones. Acta Radiol 2009;50:340-347
- Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Harada M. Susceptibility-weighted MRI of extra-ovarian endometriosis: preliminary results. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:2512-2516
- Fujiwara T, Togashi K, Yamaoka T, Nakai A, Kido A, Nishio S, et al. Kinematics of the uterus: cine mode MR imaging. Radiographics 2004;24:e19
- Okada T, Harada M, Matsuzaki K, Nishitani H, Aono T. Evaluation of female intrapelvic tumors by clinical proton MR spectroscopy. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;13:912-917
- Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Uehara H, Shimazu H, Nishitani H. A case of adenomyomatous polyp of the uterus associated with tamoxifen therapy. Radiat Med 2005;23:432-434
- Forstner R, Cunha TM, Hamm B. MRI and CT of the female pelvis. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2018
- Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Harada M. MR manifestations of uterine polypoid adenomyoma. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:480-487
- Benagiano G, Brosens I, Habiba M. Adenomyosis: a life-cycle approach. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:220-232
- Wolfman DJ, Ascher SM. Magnetic resonance imaging of benign uterine pathology. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2006;17:399-407
- Bazot M, Darai E. Role of transvaginal sonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of uterine adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2018;109:389-397
- Kishi Y, Suginami H, Kuramori R, Yabuta M, Suginami R, Taniguchi F. Four subtypes of adenomyosis assessed by magnetic resonance imaging and their specification. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2012;207:114.e1-114.e7
- Kobayashi H, Matsubara S. A classification proposal for adenomyosis based on magnetic resonance imaging. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2020;85:118-126
- Gordts S, Grimbizis G, Campo R. Symptoms and classification of uterine adenomyosis, including the place of hysteroscopy in diagnosis. Fertil Steril 2018;109:380-388.e1
- Ferenczy A. Pathophysiology of adenomyosis. Hum Reprod Update 1998;4:312-322
- Kobayashi H, Matsubara S, Imanaka S. Relationship between magnetic resonance imaging-based classification of adenomyosis and disease severity. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2021;47:2251-2260
- Grimbizis GF, Mikos T, Tarlatzis B. Uterus-sparing operative treatment for adenomyosis. Fertil Steril 2014;101:472-487
- Takeuchi M, Matsuzaki K, Bando Y, Harada M. MR imaging findings of uterine adenomatoid tumors. Magn Reson Med Sci 2024;23:127-135
- Kido A, Togashi K, Koyama T, Yamaoka T, Fujiwara T, Fujii S. Diffusely enlarged uterus: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiographics 2003;23:1423-1439
- Goto N, Oishi-Tanaka Y, Tsunoda H, Yoshikawa H, Minami M. Magnetic resonance findings of primary uterine malignant lymphoma. Magn Reson Med Sci 2007;6:7-13