Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회지)

The Korean Society of Radiology (대한영상의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Normal Development and Variants in Pediatric Bone

소아 뼈의 정상 발달과 변이

  • Hee Jung Kim (Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Sun Kyoung You (Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine)
  • 김희중 (충남대학교 의과대학 충남대학교병원 영상의학과) ;
  • 유선경 (충남대학교 의과대학 충남대학교병원 영상의학과)
  • Received : 2024.02.10
  • Accepted : 2024.03.21
  • Published : 2024.05.01
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Normal variants refer to imaging findings that are generally asymptomatic and discovered incidentally, yet may exhibit findings similar to those observed in pathological conditions. Recognizing normal variants in pediatric bone requires comprehension of the developmental process of long tubular bones and secondary ossification centers. Familiarity with various radiological findings of normal variants can prevent unnecessary follow-up imaging tests, as well as incorrect diagnosis and treatment. In this review, we will discuss the characteristic imaging findings of normal variants seen in growing pediatric bones, along with strategies for distinguishing them from pathologic conditions.

정상 변이란 일반적으로 무증상이며 우연히 발견되는 영상 소견을 의미하며, 병적 상태와 유사한 소견을 보일 수 있다. 소아 뼈의 정상 변이를 인지하기 위해서는 장관 골 및 이차 골화 중심의 발달 과정에 대한 이해가 필요하다. 정상 변이의 다양한 영상의학적 소견에 익숙해진다면 불필요한 추가 영상 검사 및 잘못된 진단과 치료를 방지할 수 있다. 본 종설에서는 성장하는 소아의 뼈에서 보이는 정상 변이들의 특징적인 영상 소견과 이를 병적 상태와 구별하기 위한 방법들에 대해서 논의하고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Augusto ACL, Goes PCK, Flores DV, Costa MAF, Takahashi MS, Rodrigues ACO, et al. Imaging review of normal and abnormal skeletal maturation. Radiographics 2022;42:861-879
  2. Coley BD. Caffey's pediatric diagnostic imaging. 13th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Health Sciences 2018
  3. Walter WR, Goldman LH, Rosenberg ZS. Pitfalls in MRI of the developing pediatric ankle. Radiographics 2021;41:210-223
  4. Calder AD, Arulkumaran S, D'Arco F. Imaging in osteopetrosis. Bone 2022;165:116560
  5. Kwon DS, Spevak MR, Fletcher K, Kleinman PK. Physiologic subperiosteal new bone formation: prevalence, distribution, and thickness in neonates and infants. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002;179:985-988
  6. Swischuk LE. Imaging of the newborn, infant, and young child. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2003
  7. Miyazaki CS, Maranho DA, Agnollitto PM, Nogueira-Barbosa MH. Study of secondary ossification centers of the elbow in the Brazilian population. Acta Ortop Bras 2017;25:279-282
  8. Bae C, Kim BS. [Radiographic study on the time of appearance of the ossification centers in school aged children]. J Korean Radiol Soc 1977;13:28-34. Korean
  9. Lee SH, Park SW, Suh DH, Kim TH. [The sequential development of elbow-ossification centers in children]. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2000;35:421-426. Korean
  10. Cheng JC, Wing-Man K, Shen WY, Yurianto H, Xia G, Lau JT, et al. A new look at the sequential development of elbow-ossification centers in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1998;18:161-167
  11. Goodwin SJ, Irwin LJ, Irwin GJ. Gender differences in the order of appearance of elbow ossification centres. Scott Med J 2019;64:2-9
  12. Ogden JA, Ganey TM, Light TR, Belsole RJ, Greene TL. Ossification and pseudoepiphysis formation in the "nonepiphyseal" end of bones of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiol 1994;23:3-13
  13. Lee HM, Kim JP, Kang S, Kim YS, Lee MY. [Radiologic prevalence and features of metacarpal pseudoepiphysis on normal Korean children]. J Korean Orthop Assoc 2018;53:234-242. Korean
  14. Georgiadis AG, Gannon NP. Park-Harris lines. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022;30:e1483-e1494
  15. Seo SG, Sung KH, Chung CY, Lee KM, Lee SY, Choi Y, et al. Incidental findings on knee radiographs in children and adolescents. Clin Orthop Surg 2014;6:305-311
  16. Lerisson H, Tillaux C, Boutry N. Radiographic/MR imaging correlation of the pediatric knee growth. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2019;27:737-751
  17. Laor T, Jaramillo D. Metaphyseal abnormalities in children: pathophysiology and radiologic appearance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;161:1029-1036
  18. Riquelme V, Garcia CB. Imaging studies in early diagnosis of childhood leukemia. Rev Chil Radiol 2012;18:24-29
  19. Herneth AM, Philipp MO, Pretterklieber ML, Balassy C, Winkelbauer FW, Beaulieu CF. Asymmetric closure of ischiopubic synchondrosis in pediatric patients: correlation with foot dominance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;182:361-365
  20. Williams H. Normal anatomical variants and other mimics of skeletal trauma. In Johnson KJ, Bache E, eds. Imaging in pediatric skeletal trauma: techniques and application. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2008:91-118
  21. Herneth AM, Trattnig S, Bader TR, Ba-Ssalamah A, Ponhold W, Wandl-Vergesslich K, et al. MR imaging of the ischiopubic synchondrosis. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:519-524
  22. Lemperg R, Liliequist B, Mattsson S. Asymmetry of the epiphyseal nucleus in the femoral head in stable and unstable hip joints. Pediatr Radiol 1973;1:191-195
  23. Prince JS. The lower extremity: congenital and developmental conditions. In Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges S, Ozonoff M, eds. Pediatric orthopedic imaging. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2014:373-433
  24. Stern C, Galley J, Frohlich S, Peterhans L, Sporri J, Sutter R. Distal femoral cortical irregularity at knee MRI: increased prevalence in youth competitive alpine skiers. Radiology 2020;296:411-419
  25. Pai DR, Strouse PJ. MRI of the pediatric knee. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196:1019-1027
  26. Jans LB, Jaremko JL, Ditchfield M, Huysse WC, Verstraete KL. MRI differentiates femoral condylar ossification evolution from osteochondritis dissecans. A new sign. Eur Radiol 2011;21:1170-1179
  27. Gorbachova T, Melenevsky Y, Cohen M, Cerniglia BW. Osteochondral lesions of the knee: differentiating the most common entities at MRI. Radiographics 2018;38:1478-1495
  28. Kim HG, Choi HY, Park JS, Ryu KN, Park SY, Jin W. [Clinical features and radiological differential diagnoses of symptomatic sesamoid bones and accessory ossicles: a pictorial essay]. J Korean Soc Radiol 2021;82:82-98. Korean
  29. Blythe CS, Reynolds MS, Gregory LS. Quantifying the ossification and fusion of the calcaneal apophysis using computed tomography. J Anat 2022;241:484-499
  30. Teo ELHJ. Pediatric nontraumatic musculoskeletal lesions: imaging pitfalls. In Peh W, ed. Pitfalls in musculoskeletal radiology. Cham: Springer 2017:819-851
  31. Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Bencardino JT. MR imaging of the ankle and foot. Radiographics 2000;20(suppl 1):S153-S179
  32. Williams GA, Cowell HR. Kohler's disease of the tarsal navicular. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1981;158:53-58
  33. Tuthill HL, Finkelstein ER, Sanchez AM, Clifford PD, Subhawong TK, Jose J. Imaging of tarsal navicular disorders: a pictorial review. Foot Ankle Spec 2014;7:210-224
  34. Kan JH. Pediatric and adolescent musculoskeletal MRI. A case-based approach. New York: Springer 2010
  35. Davies CM, Hackman L, Black S. The utility of the proximal epiphysis of the fifth metatarsal in age estimation. J Forensic Sci 2013;58:436-442
  36. Hammer MR, Pai DR. The foot and ankle: congenital and developmental conditions. In Stein-Wexler R, Wootton-Gorges S, Ozonoff M, eds. Pediatric orthopedic imaging. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 2014:463-516
  37. Cheema JI, Grissom LE, Harcke HT. Radiographic characteristics of lower-extremity bowing in children. Radiographics 2003;23:871-880