The Transactions of the Korea Information Processing Society (정보처리학회 논문지)

Korea Information Processing Society (한국정보처리학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluating the Efficiency of Models for Predicting Seismic Building Damage

지진으로 인한 건물 손상 예측 모델의 효율성 분석

  • 채송화 (숙명여자대학교 인공지능공학부) ;
  • 임유진 (숙명여자대학교 인공지능공학부)
  • Received : 2023.12.28
  • Accepted : 2024.04.19
  • Published : 2024.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Predicting earthquake occurrences accurately is challenging, and preparing all buildings with seismic design for such random events is a difficult task. Analyzing building features to predict potential damage and reinforcing vulnerabilities based on this analysis can minimize damages even in buildings without seismic design. Therefore, research analyzing the efficiency of building damage prediction models is essential. In this paper, we compare the accuracy of earthquake damage prediction models using machine learning classification algorithms, including Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, and CatBoost, utilizing data from buildings damaged during the 2015 Nepal earthquake.

지진 발생은 정확히 예측하기 어렵고, 이러한 무작위성을 갖는 사건에 대비하여 모든 건물에 내진 설계를 도입하는 것은 현실적으로 어려운 과제이다. 건물의 특징 분석을 통한 건물 손상 예측을 기반으로 건물의 취약점을 보완한다면, 내진 설계를 도입하지 않은 건물에서도 피해를 최소화할 수 있으므로 건물 손상 예측 모델의 효율성을 분석하는 연구가 필요하다. 본 논문에서는 2015년 네팔 대지진으로 인해 손상된 건물 데이터를 활용하여 Random Forest, Extreme Gradient Boosting, LightGBM, CatBoost 기계학습 분류 알고리즘을 사용하여 지진 피해 예측 모델의 정확도를 비교하였다.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 과학기술정보통신부 및 정보통신기획평가원의 ICT혁신인재 4.0 사업의 연구결과로 수행되었음(IITP-2024-RS-2022-00156299).

References

  1. D. Gautam, and H. Chaulagain, "Structural performance and associated lessons to be learned from world earthquakes in Nepal after 25 April 2015 (MW 7.8) Gorkha earthquake," Engineering Failure Analysis, Vol.68, 2016.
  2. 2015 Nepal Earthquake: Open Data Portal [Internet], http://eq2015.klldev.org/#/
  3. C. C. Aggarwal, "Data classification: Algorithms and applications," Yorktown Heights, NY, United States, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, 2018.
  4. Gede Angga Pradipta, "SMOTE for Handling Imbalanced Data Problem: A Review," 2021 Sixth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), 03 November 2021.
  5. P. M. Chanal and M. S. Kakkasageri, "Random forest algorithm based device authentication in IoT," IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Computing and Communication Technologies (CONECCT), 14-16 Jul. 2023.
  6. W. Feng, X. Gao, G. Dauphin, and Y.Quan, "Rotation XGBoost based method for hyperspectral image classification with limited training samples," IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), 08 Oct. 2023.
  7. J. Huang and W. Chen, "A study on category classification based on LightGBM for signal feature extraction and k-means clustering," IEEE 5th International Conference on Power, Intelligent Computing and Systems (ICPICS), 14 Jul. 2023.
  8. N. Acharya, A. K. Singh, A. K. Dwivedi, and P. Kannadaguli, "Indian food segmentation and calorie estimation using catboost and masked convolutional neural networks," International Conference on Network, Multimedia and Information Technology (NMITCON), 01 Sep. 2023.
  9. B. V. Calster, V. V. Belle, G. Condous, T. Bourne, D. Timmerman, and S. V. Huffel, "Multi-class AUC metrics and weighted alternatives," IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IEEE World Congress on Computational Intelligence), Jun. 2008.