Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparative Evaluation of the Fluoride Releasing Ability and Microbial Attachment of Glass-Hybrid Restorative Material

  • MinKi Choi (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Howon Park (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Siyoung Lee (Department of Microbiology and Immunology, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Haeni Kim (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Juhyun Lee (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Oral Science Research Center, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2023.07.27
  • Accepted : 2023.09.06
  • Published : 2024.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the fluoride-releasing ability and degree of microbial attachment of a newly developed glass-hybrid restorative material (GH) with those of a high-viscosity glass ionomer (HvGIC), resin-modified glass ionomer (RMGI), and composite resin (CR). In addition, the correlation between fluoride-releasing ability and microbial attachment between materials was evaluated. Specimens were prepared in a disc shape and divided into 4 groups according to the materials (GH, HvGIC, RMGI, and CR). The fluoride release experiments were performed in each group (n = 15). The amount of fluoride released was measured on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 28, and 42 after storage. For the microbial attachment experiment, 12 specimens were produced per group using Mutans Streptococci (S.mutans ), a cariogenic microorganism. S. mutans was cultured on the specimens for 24 hours, and the number of bacteria was measured. GH had the highest cumulative fluoride release and showed a significant difference when compared with RMGI (p = 0.001) and CR (p < 0.0001). Microbial attachment was the lowest in GH; however, no significant difference was observed between the materials (p = 0.169). There was no significant correlation between fluoride release from materials and microbial attachment (p > 0.05). From this perspective, remineralization of low-mineralized areas could be expected due to the high fluoride release of GH, and the effect of delaying the progression of dental caries could be predicted from the low cariogenic microbial attachment. Therefore, GH might be a useful restorative material for treating immature permanent teeth with hypomineralized enamel. However, further studies are needed about the degree of remineralization of hypomineralized areas after restoration and the capacity to recharge fluoride.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the Scientific Research (SR2303) of Gangneung-Wonju National University Dental Hospital.

References

  1. Zhao D, Dong B, Yu D, Ren Q, Sun Y : The prevalence of molar incisor hypomineralization: evidence from 70 studies. Int J Paediatr Dent, 28:170-179, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12323
  2. Trevia LRA, de Castro VA, Valadas L, Tapety CMC, de Sousa Pereira M, Chagas FO, Dias CC, Fernandes AMB, Lobo PLD : Molar Incisor Hypomineralization (MIH): Literature Review and Case Report. J Young Pharm, 12:182-184, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5530/jyp.2020.12.37
  3. Seow WK : Developmental defects of enamel and dentine: challenges for basic science research and clinical management. Aust Dent J, 59(Suppl 1):S143-S154, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/adj.12104
  4. Elhennawy K, Schwendicke F : Managing molar-incisor hypomineralization: A systematic review. J Dent, 55:16-24, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.09.012
  5. Cury JA, de Oliveira BH, dos Santos APP, Tenuta LM : Are fluoride releasing dental materials clinically effective on caries control? Dent Mater , 32:323-333, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2015.12.002
  6. Mosci F, Perito S, Bassa S, Capuano A, Marconi PF : The role of Streptococcus mutans in human caries. Minerva Stomatol, 39:413-429, 1990.
  7. Hayashi M, Matsuura R, Yamamoto T : Effects of low concentration fluoride released from fluoride-sustained-releasing composite resin on the bioactivity of Streptococcus mutans. Dent Mater J, 41:309-316, 2022. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2021-219
  8. Abdul Quader SM, Shamsul Alam M, Bashar AKM, Gafur A, Al-Mansur MA : Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of giomer. Update Dent Coll J, 2:28-37, 2013. https://doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v2i2.15533
  9. Moshaverinia M, Navas A, Jahedmanesh N, Shah KC, Moshaverinia A, Ansari S : Comparative evaluation of the physical properties of a reinforced glass ionomer dental restorative material. J Prosthet Dent, 122:154-159, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2019.03.012
  10. Komandla DR, Archarya SR, Pentapati KC : Comparative evaluation of surface roughness of resin-modified glass ionomer and glass hybrid restorative materials simulated by tooth brushing: An in-vitro study. Pesqui Bras Odontopediatria Clin Integr, 21:E0259, 2021.
  11. Dhivya S, Vasanthakumari A, Selvabalaji A, Preethi Archana S, Anagha C, Kumar K : Comparative evaluation of microleakage of three different restorative materials (Cention N, Zirconomer improved and Glass hybrid restorative system) in class V cavity restoration using stereomicroscope: In vitro study. J Pharm Res Int, 34:34-42, 2022. https://doi.org/10.9734/jpri/2022/v34i12A35549
  12. Nakajo K, Imazato S, Takahashi Y, Kiba W, Ebisu S, Takahashi N : Fluoride released from glass-ionomer cement is responsible to inhibit the acid production of caries-related oral streptococci. Dent Mater, 25:703-708, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2008.10.014
  13. Ibraheem AF, Al-Qutib TA : Inhibition of artificial secondary caries by fluoride - releasing restorative materials. J Bagh Coll Dentistry, 18:6-11, 2006.
  14. Hicks J, Garcia-Godoy F, Donly K, Flaitz C : Fluoride-Releasing Restorative Materials and Secondary Caries. J Calif Dent Assoc, 31:229-245, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1080/19424396.2003.12224158
  15. Hahnel S, Ionescu AC, Cazzaniga G, Ottobelli M, Brambilla E : Biofilm formation and release of fluoride from dental restorative materials in relation to their surface properties. J Dent, 60:14-24, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.005
  16. Kielbassa AM, Oehme EP, Shakavets N, Wolgin M : In vitro wear of (resin-coated) high-viscosity glass ionomer cements and glass hybrid restorative systems. J Dent, 105:103554, 2021.
  17. Grossi JA, Cabral RN, Ribeiro APD, Leal SC : Glass hybrid restorations as an alternative for restoring hypomineralized molars in the ART model. BMC Oral Health, 18:65, 2018.
  18. Dijkman GE, Arends J : Secondary caries in situ around fluoride-releasing light-curing composites: A quantitative model investigation on four materials with a fluoride content between 0 and 26 vol%. Caries Res, 26:351-357, 1992. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261467
  19. Wiegand A, Buchalla W, Attin T : Review on fluoride-releasing restorative materials - Fluoride release and uptake characteristics, antibacterial activity and influence on caries formation. Dent Mater, 23:343-362, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.01.022
  20. Bell A, Creanor SL, Foye RH, Saunders WP : The effect of saliva on fluoride release by a glass-ionomer filling material. J Oral Rehabil, 26:407-412, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2842.1999.00389.x
  21. Yap AU, Tham SY, Zhu LY, Lee HK : Short-term fluoride release from various aesthetic restorative materials. Oper Dent, 27:259-265, 2002.
  22. Mousavinasab SM, Meyers I : Fluoride release by glass ionomer cements, compomer and giomer. Dent Res J, 6:75-81, 2009.
  23. Lee D, Kim J, Han M, Shin J : Fluoride release and recharge properties of several fluoride-containing restorative materials. J Korean Acad Pediatr Dent, 47: 196-204, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5933/JKAPD.2020.47.2.196
  24. Karantakis P, Helvatjoglou-Antoniades M, Theodoridou-Pahini S, Papadogiannis Y : Fluoride release from three glass ionomers, a compomer, and a composite resin in water, artificial saliva, and lactic acid. Oper Dent, 25:20-25, 2000.
  25. Zebic ML, Jakovljevic N, Miletic V : Fluoride release from conventional, resin-modified and hybrid glass ionomer cements. Serbian Dent J, 65:187-194, 2018. https://doi.org/10.2478/sdj-2018-0018
  26. Momoi Y, McCabe JF : Fluoride release from light-activated glass ionomer restorative cements. Dent Mater, 9:151-154, 1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(93)90112-4
  27. DeSchepper EJ, White RR, von der Lehr W : Antibacterial effects of glass ionomers. Am J Dent, 2:51-56, 1989.
  28. Herrera M, Castillo A, Baca P, Carrion P : Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer restorative cements exposed to cavity-producing microorganisms. Oper Dent, 24:286-291, 1999.
  29. Quirynen M, Bollen CM : The influence of surface roughness and surface-free energy on supra- and subgingival plaque formation in man. A review of the literature. J Clin Periodontol, 22:1-14, 1995. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.1995.tb01765.x
  30. Deligeorgi V, Wilson NH, Fouzas D, Kouklaki E, Burke FJ, Mjor IA : Reasons for placement and replacement of restorations in student clinics in Manchester and Athens. Eur J Dent Educ, 4:153-159, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0579.2000.040402.x