대한간호학회지 (Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing)

한국간호과학회 (Korean Society of Nursing Science)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

소셜미디어 내 의료소비자의 환자안전 관심에 대한 구조적 토픽 모델링 분석

Structural Topic Modeling Analysis of Patient Safety Interest among Health Consumers in Social Media

  • 김나리 (서울대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 이남주 (서울대학교 간호대학.간호과학연구소)
  • Kim, Nari (Colloege of Nursing, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Nam-Ju (The Research Institute of Nursing Science.College of Nursing, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2023.12.11
  • 심사 : 2024.04.25
  • 발행 : 2024.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate healthcare consumers' interest in patient safety on social media using structural topic modeling (STM) and to identify changes in interest over time. Methods: Analyzing 105,727 posts from Naver news comments, blogs, internet cafés, and Twitter between 2010 and 2022, this study deployed a Python script for data collection and preprocessing. STM analysis was conducted using R, with the documents' publication years serving as metadata to trace the evolution of discussions on patient safety. Results: The analysis identified a total of 13 distinct topics, organized into three primary communities: (1) "Demand for systemic improvement of medical accidents," underscoring the need for legal and regulatory reform to enhance accountability; (2) "Efforts of the government and organizations for safety management," highlighting proactive risk mitigation strategies; and (3) "Medical accidents exposed in the media," reflecting widespread concerns over medical negligence and its repercussions. These findings indicate pervasive concerns regarding medical accountability and transparency among healthcare consumers. Conclusion: The findings emphasize the importance of transparent healthcare policies and practices that openly address patient safety incidents. There is clear advocacy for policy reforms aimed at increasing the accountability and transparency of healthcare providers. Moreover, this study highlights the significance of educational and engagement initiatives involving healthcare consumers in fostering a culture of patient safety. Integrating consumer perspectives into patient safety strategies is crucial for developing a robust safety culture in healthcare.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kohn LT, Corrigan JM, Donaldson MS. To err is human: Building a safer health system. National Academy Press; 2000.
  2. Lee JH, Lee SI. Patient safety: The concept and general approach. Quality Improvement in Health Care. 2009;15(1):9-18.
  3. Kang SJ, Park JY. Patient safety perception and patient participation among hemato-oncology patients. Asian Oncology Nursing. 2019;19(4):224-232. https://doi.org/10.5388/aon.2019.19.4.224
  4. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). Patient Safety Act: Act No. 16893 [Internet]. MOHW; c2021 [cited 2024 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.law.go.kr/LSW/lsInfoP.do?lsiSeq=213551&ancYd=20200129&ancNo=16893&efYd=20210130&nwJoYnInfo=Y&efGubun=Y&chrClsCd=010202&ancYnChk=0#0000.
  5. Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW). 1st Comprehensive Patient Safety Plan (2018-2022) [Internet]. MOHW; c2018 [cited 2024 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.mohw.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10401000000&bid=0008&tag=&act=view&list_no=344873.
  6. Health and Safety Commission; Advisory Committee on the Safety of Nuclear Installations (ACSNI). Organising for safety: Third report of the ACSNI study group on human factors. HSE Books; 1993.
  7. World Health Organization (WHO). World Patient Safety Day 2023 [Internet]. WHO; c2023 [cited 2024 Mar 25]. Available from: https://www.who.int/campaigns/world-patient-safety-day/2023.
  8. Health Consumers NSW (HCNSW). Who is a health consumer? [Internet]. HCNSW; c2024 [cited 2024 Mar 2]. Available from: https://hcnsw.org.au/training- resources/resources/consumers-toolkit/getting-started/who-is-a-health-consumer-and-other-definitions/
  9. World Health Organization (WHO). Global patient safety action plan 2021-2030: Towards eliminating avoidable harm in health care [Internet]. WHO; c2021 [cited 2023 Mar 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/teams/integrated-health-services/patient-safety/policy/global-patient-safety-action-plan.
  10. National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF). Safety is personal: Partnering with patients and families for the safest care. National Patient Safety Foundation; 2014. p. 1-33.
  11. Corina I, Abram M, Halperin D. The patient's role in patient safety. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America. 2019;46(2):215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ogc.2019.01.004
  12. Kim JY, Hwang EA. A study on improvement of consumer safety in medical services-based on patient safety. Korea Consumer Agency; 2014 Dec. Report No.: 14-12.
  13. Shin SH. Analysis of subgroups with lower level of patient safety perceptions using decision-tree analysis. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing. 2020;50(5):686-698. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.20044
  14. Choi N, Kim J, Kim H. The influence of patient-centeredness on patient safety perception among inpatients. PLoS One. 2021;16(2):e0246928. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0246928
  15. Ock M, Kim HJ, Jo MW, Lee SI. Perceptions of the general public and physicians regarding open disclosure in Korea: A qualitative study. BMC Medical Ethics. 2016;17(1):50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0134-0
  16. Kim Y, Lee E. Patients' and families' experiences regarding disclosure of patient safety incidents. Qualitative Health Research. 2021;31(13):2502-2511. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323211037634
  17. Jang SG, Park E, Lee J, Choi JE, Lee SI, Han H, et al. An exploration into patients' experiences that make them feel safe during hospitalization: A qualitative study. Journal of Korean Medical Science. 2022;37(33):e256. https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e256
  18. Lee NJ, Ahn S, Lee M. Mixed-method investigation of health consumers' perception and experience of participation in patient safety activities. BMJ Open. 2020;10(3):e035831. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035831
  19. Lee J, Park HA, Park SK, Song TM. Using social media data to understand consumers' information needs and emotions regarding cancer: Ontology-based data analysis study. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2020;22(12):e18767. https://doi.org/10.2196/18767
  20. Taggart T, Grewe ME, Conserve DF, Gliwa C, Roman Isler M. Social media and HIV: A systematic review of uses of social media in HIV communication. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2015;17(11):e248. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.4387
  21. Bahng J, Lee CH. Topic modeling for analyzing patients' perceptions and concerns of hearing loss on social Q&A sites: Incorporating patients' perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(17): 6209. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176209
  22. Park SH, Hong SH. Identification of primary medication concerns regarding thyroid hormone replacement therapy from online patient medication reviews: Text mining of social network data. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2018; 20(10):e11085. https://doi.org/10.2196/11085
  23. Roberts ME, Stewart BM, Tingley D, Lucas C, Leder-Luis J, Gadarian SK, et al. Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science. 2014;58(4):1064-1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12103
  24. Jo W, Kim Y, Seo M, Lee N, Park J. Online information analysis on pancreatic cancer in Korea using structural topic model. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):10622. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14506-1
  25. Luo C, Ji K, Tang Y, Du Z. Exploring the expression differences between professionals and laypeople toward the COVID-19 vaccine: Text mining approach. Journal of Medical Internet Research. 2021;23(8):e30715. https://doi.org/10.2196/30715
  26. Lu J, Liu J. Communicating concerns, emotional expressions, and disparities on ethnic communities on social media during the COVID-19 pandemic: A structural topic modeling approach. American Behavioral Scientist. Forthcoming 2023 Apr 13. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027642231164046
  27. Internet Trend. Search engines [Internet]. Internet Trend; c2022 [cited 2022 Jul 7]. Available from: http://internettrend.co.kr/trendForward.tsp.
  28. Roberts ME, Stewart BM, Tingley D. stm: An R package for structural topic models. Journal of Statistical Software. 2019;91(2):1-40. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v091.i02
  29. Wallach HM, Murray I, Salakhutdinov R, Mimno D. Evaluation methods for topic models. In: Bottou L, Littman M, editors. Proceedings of the 26th Annual International Conference on Machine Learning; 2009 Jun 14-18; Montreal, Canada. New York (NY): Association for Computing Machinery; 2009. p. 1105-1112.
  30. Jo WK. Characteristics of South Korea's early response to the public health crisis and their implications: Topic modeling of early media coverage of MERS and COVID-19. Information Society & Media. 2021;22(2):25-50. https://doi.org/10.52558/ISM.2021.08.22.2.25
  31. Wickham H Chang W. Package 'ggplot2' [Internet]. c2014 [cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=af53fd2f5b9e81b6edec0c13e1b3babd34bda399.
  32. Csardi MG. Package 'igraph' [Internet]. c2021 [cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://igraph.org/r/pdf/1.2.6/igraph.pdf.
  33. Fortunato S, Hric D. Community detection in networks: A user guide. Physics Reports. 2016;659:1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2016.09.002
  34. An GJ. An Gi Jong's Patient Shouting. There should be no more group deaths in the neonatal intensive care unit [Internet]. Kuki News; c2018 [cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.kukinews.com/newsView/kuk201801120241.
  35. Kim MJ. A study on establishment and management of the CCTV in operating room. The Korean Society of Law and Medicine. 2019;20(1):109-132. https://doi.org/10.29291/kslm.2019.20.1.109
  36. Editorial. Patient safety law must include 'sorry works' [Internet]. Cheongnyeonuisa; c2013 [cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.docdocdoc.co.kr/news/articleView.html?newscd=2013040400007.
  37. Kang BY. We wanted just one sincere apology and the truth [Internet]. Cheonji Daily; c2016 [cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.newscj.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=391422.
  38. National Assembly Legislative Information System [Internet]. National Assembly of the Republic of Korea; [cited 2024 Mar 31]. Available from: https://likms.assembly.go.kr/bill/main. do.
  39. Pyo JH, Lee W, Choi EY, Jang SG, Ock MS, Lee SI. Promoting awareness of patient safety and patient engagement through patient safety education for the general public: Pilot study. Korean Public Health Research. 2018;44(3):65-88. https://doi.org/10.22900/kphr.2018.44.3.006
  40. Frankel A, Haraden C, Federico F, Lenoci-Edwards J. A framework for safe, reliable, and effective care. White Paper. Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2017. p. 1-31.
  41. Dekker S. Introduction to restorative just culture. In: Dekker S, Oates A, Rafferty J, editors. Restorative Just Culture in Practice: Implementation and Evaluation. Productivity Press; 2022. p. 1-20.
  42. Ock M, Lee SI. Disclosure of patient safety incidents: Implications from ethical and quality of care perspectives. Journal of the Korean Medical Association. 2017;60(5):417-427. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2017.60.5.417
  43. Lee SH, Shin YH, Kim SS. Comparing attitudes toward disclosing medical errors between medical students and interns. Korean Journal of Medical Education. 2012;24(3):247-258. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2012.24.3.247
  44. World Health Organization (WHO) [Internet]. Twitter; [cited 2024 Mar 31]. Available from: https://twitter.com/WHO.
  45. Institute for Safe Medication Practices Canada (ISMP Canada) [Internet]. Twitter; [cited 2024 Mar 31]. Available from: https://twitter.com/ISMPCanada.
  46. Korea Press Foundation (KPF). Social media users in Korea 2021 [Internet]. Korea Press Foundation; c2021 [cited 2023 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.kpf.or.kr/front/research/consumerDetail.do?seq=592324.
  47. Palm W, Nys H, Townend D, Shaw D, Clemens T, Brand H. Patients' rights: From recognition to implementation. In: Nolte E, Merkur S, Anell A, editors. Achieving Person-Centred Health Systems: Evidence, Strategies and Challenges. Cambridge University Press; 2020. p. 347-386.