Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제49권2호
  • /
  • Pages.18.1-18.13
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of a relined fiberglass post with conventional and self-adhesive resin cement

  • Wilton Lima dos Santos Junior (Operative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Marina Rodrigues Santi (Operative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas) ;
  • Rodrigo Barros Esteves Lins (Operative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Alagoas) ;
  • Luis Roberto Marcondes Martins (Operative Dentistry Division, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.28
  • 심사 : 2024.01.26
  • 발행 : 2024.05.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study was conducted to evaluate the mechanical properties of relined and non-relined fiberglass posts when cemented to root canal dentin using a conventional dual-cure resin cement or a self-adhesive resin cement. Materials and Methods: Two types of resin cements were utilized: conventional and self-adhesive. Additionally, 2 cementation protocols were employed, involving relined and non-relined fiberglass posts. In total, 72 bovine incisors were cemented and subjected to push-out bond strength testing (n = 10) followed by failure mode analysis. The cross-sectional microhardness (n = 5) was assessed along the root canal, and interface analyses (n = 3) were conducted using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data from the push-out bond strength and cross-sectional microhardness tests were analyzed via 3-way analysis of variance and the Bonferroni post-hoc test (α= 0.05). Results: For non-relined fiberglass posts, conventional resin cement exhibited higher pushout bond strength than self-adhesive cement. Relined fiberglass posts yielded comparable results between the resin cements. Type II failure was the most common failure mode for both resin cements, regardless of cementation protocol. The use of relined fiberglass posts improved the cross-sectional microhardness values for both cements. SEM images revealed voids and bubbles in the incisors with non-relined fiberglass posts. Conclusions: Mechanical properties were impacted by the cementation protocol. Relined fiberglass posts presented the highest push-out bond strength and cross-sectional microhardness values, regardless of the resin cement used (conventional dual-cure or self-adhesive). Conversely, for non-relined fiberglass posts, the conventional dual-cure resin cement yielded superior results to the self-adhesive resin cement.

키워드

과제정보

This study was partially funded by the Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) under Funding Code 001.

참고문헌

  1. Shafiei F, Mohammadparast P, Jowkar Z. Adhesion performance of a universal adhesive in the root canal: effect of etch-and-rinse vs. self-etch mode. PLoS One 2018;13:e0195367.
  2. Machry RV, Fontana PE, Bohrer TC, Valandro LF, Kaizer OB. Effect of different surface treatments of resin relined fiber posts cemented with self-adhesive resin cement on push-out and microtensile bond strength tests. Oper Dent 2020;45:E185-E195. https://doi.org/10.2341/19-108-L
  3. Silva GR, Santos-Filho PC, Simamoto-Junior PC, Martins LR, Mota AS, Soares CJ. Effect of post type and restorative techniques on the strain and fracture resistance of flared incisor roots. Braz Dent J 2011;22:230-237. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-64402011000300009
  4. Silva CF, Cabral LC, Navarro de Oliveira M, da Mota Martins V, Machado AC, Blumenberg C, et al. The influence of customization of glass fiber posts on fracture strength and failure pattern: a systematic review and meta-analysis of preclinical ex-vivo studies. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2021;118:104433.
  5. Rodrigues RV, Sampaio CS, Pacheco RR, Pascon FM, Puppin-Rontani RM, Giannini M. Influence of adhesive cementation systems on the bond strength of relined fiber posts to root dentin. J Prosthet Dent 2017;118:493-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.006
  6. Marchionatti AME, Wandscher VF, Rippe MP, Kaizer OB, Valandro LF. Clinical performance and failure modes of pulpless teeth restored with posts: a systematic review. Braz Oral Res 2017;31:e64.
  7. Parcina Amizic I, Baraba A, Ionescu AC, Brambilla E, Van Ende A, Miletic I. Bond strength of individually formed and prefabricated fiber-reinforced composite posts. J Adhes Dent 2019;21:557-565.
  8. Freitas TL, Vitti RP, Miranda ME, Brandt WC. Effect of glass fiber post adaptation on push-out bond strength to root dentin. Braz Dent J 2019;30:350-355. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440201902491
  9. Leandrin TP, Fernandez E, Lima RO, Besegato JF, Escalante-Otarola WG, Kuga MC. Customized fiber post improves the bond strength and dentinal penetrability of resin cementation system to root dentin. Oper Dent 2022;47:E22-E34. https://doi.org/10.2341/20-117-L
  10. Jurema ALB, Filgueiras AT, Santos KA, Bresciani E, Caneppele TMF. Effect of intraradicular fiber post on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated and restored anterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:13-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.12.013
  11. Hoshino IAE, Dos Santos PH, Briso ALF, Sundfeld RH, Yamaguchi S, Rocha EP, et al. Biomechanical performance of three fiberglass post cementation techniques: Imaging, in vitro, and in silico analysis. J Prosthodont Res 2023;67:103-111. https://doi.org/10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_21_00253
  12. Souza NC, Marcondes ML, Breda RV, Weber JB, Mota EG, Spohr AM. Relined fiberglass post: an ex vivo study of the resin cement thickness and dentin-resin interface. Braz Oral Res 2016;30:S1806-83242016000100274. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.vol30.0077
  13. Lins RBE, Cordeiro JM, Rangel CP, Antunes TBM, Martins LRM. The effect of individualization of fiberglass posts using bulk-fill resin-based composites on cementation: an in vitro study. Restor Dent Endod 2019;44:e37.
  14. Pan Y, Xu X, Sun F, Meng X. Surface morphology and mechanical properties of conventional and selfadhesive resin cements after aqueous aging. J Appl Oral Sci 2018;27:e20170449.
  15. Karakis D, Yildirim-Bicer AZ, Dogan A, Koralay H, Cavdar S. Effect of self and dual-curing on degree of conversion and crosslink density of dual-cure core build-up materials. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:210-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.05.002
  16. Hitz T, Stawarczyk B, Fischer J, Hammerle CH, Sailer I. Are self-adhesive resin cements a valid alternative to conventional resin cements? A laboratory study of the long-term bond strength. Dent Mater 2012;28:1183-1190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.09.006
  17. Roesner AJ, Schmohl L, Hahnel S, Fuchs F, Konig A, Rauch A. Acid resistance of self-adhesive resin luting cements - changes in surface texture parameters and microhardness. Dent Mater 2022;38:1376-1384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2022.06.013
  18. Wang C, Fang Y, Zhang L, Su Z, Xu J, Fu B. Enamel microstructural features of bovine and human incisors: a comparative study. Ann Anat 2021;235:151700.
  19. Pedreira AP, Pegoraro LF, de Goes MF, Pegoraro TA, Carvalho RM. Microhardness of resin cements in the intraradicular environment: effects of water storage and softening treament. Dent Mater 2009;25:868-876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2009.01.096
  20. Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Borracchini A, Ferrari M. SEM evaluation of the cement layer thickness after luting two different posts. J Adhes Dent 2005;7:235-240.
  21. Gomes GM, Gomes OM, Reis A, Gomes JC, Loguercio AD, Calixto AL. Effect of operator experience on the outcome of fiber post cementation with different resin cements. Oper Dent 2013;38:555-564. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-494-L
  22. Manso AP, Carvalho RM. Dental cements for luting and bonding restorations: self-adhesive resin cements. Dent Clin North Am 2017;61:821-834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2017.06.006
  23. Zorzin J, Petschelt A, Ebert J, Lohbauer U. pH neutralization and influence on mechanical strength in selfadhesive resin luting agents. Dent Mater 2012;28:672-679. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2012.03.005
  24. Faria-e-Silva AL, Menezes MS, Silva FP, Reis GR, Moraes RR. Intra-radicular dentin treatments and retention of fiber posts with self-adhesive resin cements. Braz Oral Res 2013;27:14-19. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-83242013000100003
  25. Moazzami SM, Kazemi R, Alami M, Attaran E, Mehhary M, Sarmad M, et al. Light conduction capability of different light-transmitting FRC posts. J Dent Mater Tech 2012;1:40-46.
  26. Caughman WF, Chan DC, Rueggeberg FA. Curing potential of dual-polymerizable resin cements in simulated clinical situations. J Prosthet Dent 2001;85:479-484. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2001.114842
  27. Ramos MB, Pegoraro TA, Pegoraro LF, Carvalho RM. Effects of curing protocol and storage time on the micro-hardness of resin cements used to lute fiber-reinforced resin posts. J Appl Oral Sci 2012;20:556-562. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572012000500011
  28. Basaran G, Goncu Basaran E, Ayna E, Deger Y, Ayna B, Tuncer MC. Microtensile bond strength of root canal dentin treated with adhesive and fiber-reinforced post systems. Braz Oral Res 2019;33:e027.
  29. Bell-Ronnlof AL, Jaatinen J, Lassila L, Narhi T, Vallittu P. Transmission of light through fiber-reinforced composite posts. Dent Mater J 2019;38:928-933. https://doi.org/10.4012/dmj.2018-217
  30. Haralur SB, Alasmari TA, Alasmari MH, Hakami HM. Light transmission of various aesthetic posts at different depths and its effect on push-out bond strength, microhardness of luting cement. Medicina (Kaunas) 2022;58:75.
  31. Kim KH, Ong JL, Okuno O. The effect of filler loading and morphology on the mechanical properties of contemporary composites. J Prosthet Dent 2002;87:642-649. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.125179
  32. Karakis D, Yildirim-Bicer AZ, Dogan A, Koralay H, Cavdar S. Effect of self and dual-curing on degree of conversion and crosslink density of dual-cure core build-up materials. J Prosthodont Res 2017;61:210-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2016.05.002
  33. Lacerda FC, Vieira-Junior WF, de Lacerda PE, Turssi CP, Basting RT, do Amaral FL, et al. Immediate and long-term microshear bond strength of resin-based cements to core build-up materials. J Clin Exp Dent 2021;13:e1030-e1037. https://doi.org/10.4317/jced.58515
  34. Farina AP, Chiela H, Carlini-Junior B, Mesquita MF, Miyagaki DC, Randi Ferraz CC, et al. Influence of cement type and relining procedure on push-out bond strength of fiber posts after cyclic loading. J Prosthodont 2016;25:54-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12271
  35. Santi MR, Lins RBE, Sahadi BO, Denucci GC, Soffner G, Martins LRM. Influence of inorganic composition and filler particle morphology on the mechanical properties of self-adhesive resin cements. Restor Dent Endod 2022;47:e32.
  36. Shimokawa CA, Carneiro PM, Lobo TR, Braga RR, Turbino ML, Matos AB. Comparison between a bulk-fill resin-based composite and three luting materials on the cementation of fiberglass-reinforced posts. Restor Dent Endod 2023;48:e30.
  37. Aktemur Turker S, Uzunoglu E, Yilmaz Z. Effects of dentin moisture on the push-out bond strength of a fiber post luted with different self-adhesive resin cements. Restor Dent Endod 2013;38:234-240. https://doi.org/10.5395/rde.2013.38.4.234