Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management (품질경영학회지)

Korean Society for Quality Management (한국품질경영학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Analysis of the Effect of Platform Information Quality and Customer Information Quality on Customer Loyalty to Online to Offline Platforms

O2O 플랫폼 충성도에 플랫폼 정보 품질과 고객 정보품질이 미치는 영향 분석

  • 박준성 (연세대학교 산업공학과) ;
  • 박희준 (연세대학교 산업공학과)
  • Received : 2024.01.04
  • Accepted : 2024.02.21
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to investigate the impact of two types of information quality, which are platform-oriented information quality and customer-oriented information quality, on customers' decision-making processes in the Online to offline (O2O) platform environment. Grounded in the product brokering efficiency model, which encompasses screening cost, evaluation cost, and decision quality, a model framework was developed. Furthermore, this study explores how these decision-making processes affect customer loyalty. Methods: Given that food delivery apps are the most widely used O2O service in Korea, this study targeted users of these apps for data analysis. We conducted hypothesis testing through a purposive sampling methodology focusing on food delivery app users. A Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling analysis was conducted to analyze the data. The data collection occurred via an online survey from October to December 2021, with a total of 212 respondents participating. Results: The results of this study revealed the significant role of information quality in helping customers' decision processes while using food delivery apps. Specifically, it was found that platform-oriented information positively influences decision quality, while customer-oriented information significantly affects both the reduction of evaluation cost and the enhancement of decision quality. Additionally, the study indicated that lower evaluation costs and higher decision quality lead to increased platform loyalty. However, a reduction in screening cost did not have a significant impact on platform loyalty. Conclusion: While previous studies have overlooked the existence of two sides, service provider and user, in a platform, this research holds significance in its analysis of how information quality impacts loyalty by utilizing the two kinds of information quality. Practitioners can enhance customer loyalty to the platform by enriching customer-oriented information, thereby reducing customers' evaluation costs and encouraging more loyal usage of the platform.

Keywords

References

  1. An SJ, Seo Jay, and Choi JI. 2022. A Study on the Factors Affecting the Continuous Intention to Use Digital Content Over-the-Top Service. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(1):105-124.  https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2022.50.1.105
  2. Anderson RE, and Srinivasan SS. 2003. E-satisfaction and e-loyalty: A contingency framework. Psychology & Marketing 20(2):123-138.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10063
  3. Back KJ, and Parks SC. 2003. A brand loyalty model involving cognitive, affective, and conative brand loyalty and customer satisfaction. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research 27(4):419-435.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10963480030274003
  4. Bulut ZA, and Karabulut AN. 2018. Examining the role of two aspects of eWOM in online repurchase intention: An integrated trust-loyalty perspective. Journal of Consumer Behaviour 17(4):407-417.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1721
  5. Burton J, and Khammash M. 2010. Why do people read reviews posted on consumer-opinion portals? Journal of Marketing Management 26(3-4):230-255.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02672570903566268
  6. Cantallops AS, and Salvi F. 2014. New consumer behavior: A review of research on eWOM and hotels. International Journal of Hospitality Management 36:41-51.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.08.007
  7. Chang HH, and Chen SW. 2009. Consumer perception of interface quality, security, and loyalty in electronic commerce. Information & Management 46(7):411-417.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2009.08.002
  8. Chang YW, Hsu PY, and Yang QM. 2018. Integration of online and offline channels: A view of O2O commerce. Internet Research. 
  9. Chen CD, Huang CK, Chen MJ, and Ku E. 2015. User's Adoption of Mobile O2O Applications: Perspectives of the Uses and Gratifications Paradigm and Service Dominant Logic. Paper presented at the PACIS. 
  10. Chen X, Huang Q, and Davison RM. 2017. The role of website quality and social capital in building buyers' loyalty. International Journal of Information Management 37(1):1563-1574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2016.07.005
  11. Chen Z, and Dubinsky AJ. 2003. A conceptual model of perceived customer value in e-commerce: A preliminary investigation. Psychology & Marketing 20(4):323-347.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.10076
  12. Cheung CM, and Thadani DR. 2012. The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems 54(1):461-470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2012.06.008
  13. Chin WW. 1998. The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research 295(2):295-336. 
  14. Chou SW, and Hsu CS. 2016. Understanding online repurchase intention: social exchange theory and shopping habit. Information Systems and e-Business Management 14(1):19-45.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10257-015-0272-9
  15. Delone WH, and McLean ER. 2003. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems 19(4):9-30.  https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  16. Fornell C, and Larcker DF. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measure- ment error. Journal of Marketing Research 18(1):39-50.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  17. Gefen D, Rigdon EE, and Straub D. 2011. Editor's comments: an update and extension to SEM guidelines for administrative and social science research. MIS Quarterly, iii-xiv. 
  18. Griffith DA. 2005. An examination of the influences of store layout in online retailing. Journal of Business Research 58(10):1391-1396.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2002.08.001
  19. Hajli N. 2015. Social commerce constructs and consumer's intention to buy. International Journal of Information Management 35(2):183-191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2014.12.005
  20. Haubl G, and Trifts V. 2000. Consumer decision making in online shopping environments: The effects of interactive decision aids. Marketing Science 19(1):4-21.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.4.15178
  21. He Z, Han G, Cheng T, Fan B, and Dong J. 2019. Evolutionary food quality and location strategies for restaurants in competitive online-to-offline food ordering and delivery markets: An agent-based approach. International Journal of Production Economics 215:61-72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.05.008
  22. Hennig-Thurau T, Gwinner KP, Walsh G, and Gremler DD. 2004. Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: what motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the internet?. Journal of Interactive Marketing 18(1):38-52.  https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.10073
  23. Hsu MH, Chang CM, Chu KK, and Lee YJ. 2014. Determinants of repurchase intention in online group-buying: The perspectives of DeLone & McLean IS success model and trust. Computers in Human Behavior 36: 34-245. 
  24. Hussain S, Ahmed W, Jafar RMS, Rabnawaz A, and Jianzhou Y. 2017. eWOM source credibility, perceived risk and food product customer's information adoption. Computers in Human Behavior 66:96-102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.034
  25. Johnson EJ, Bellman S, and Lohse GL. 2003. Cognitive lock-in and the power law of practice. Journal of Marketing 67(2):62-75.  https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.67.2.62.18615
  26. Johnson GJ, Bruner II GC, and Kumar A. 2006. Interactivity and its facets revisited: Theory and empirical test. Journal of Advertising 35(4):35-52.  https://doi.org/10.2753/JOA0091-3367350403
  27. Kang JW, and Namkung Y. 2019. The information quality and source credibility matter in customers' evaluation toward food O2O commerce. International Journal of Hospitality Management 78:189-198.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.10.011
  28. Kim EJ, and Park JW. 2022. A Study on the Effect of Relationship Benefits on Customer Value, Customer Satisfaction and Loyalty - For Parents Using Early Childhood Education Institutions. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 50(2):235-250. 
  29. Kim J, Jin B, and Swinney JL. 2009. The role of etail quality, e-satisfaction and e-trust in online loyalty development process. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 16(4):239-247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2008.11.019
  30. Matute J, Polo-Redondo Y, and Utrillas A. 2016. The influence of EWOM characteristics on online repurchase intention. Online Information Review.
  31. Moon Y, and Armstrong DJ. 2019. Service quality factors affecting customer attitudes in online-to-offline commerce. Information Systems and e-Business Management:1-34. 
  32. Oliver RL. 1999. Whence consumer loyalty? Journal of Marketing 63(4_suppl1):33-44.  https://doi.org/10.1177/00222429990634s105
  33. Pappas N. 2016. Marketing strategies, perceived risks, and consumer trust in online buying behaviour. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 29:92-103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.007
  34. Ramirez A, and Burgoon JK. 2004. The effect of interactivity on initial interactions: the influence of information valence and modality and information richness on computer-mediated interaction. Communication Monographs 71(4):422-447.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0363452042000307461
  35. Ratchford BT. 2001. The economics of consumer knowledge. Journal of Consumer Research 27(4):397-411.  https://doi.org/10.1086/319617
  36. Ray A, Dhir A, Bala PK, and Kaur, P. 2019. Why do people use food delivery apps (FDA)? A uses and gratification theory perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 51:221-230.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.05.025
  37. Roh M, and Park K. 2019. Adoption of O2O food delivery services in South Korea: The moderating role of moral obligation in meal preparation. International Journal of Information Management 47:262-273.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.09.017
  38. Ryu MH, Jo DH. 2023. The Effects of Service Quality and Sensibility Quality on Brand Fanship - For Parents of Early Childhood Education Institutions. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management 51(3):347-362.  https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2023.51.3.347
  39. Shah AM, Abbasi AZ, and Yan X 2023. Do online peer reviews stimulate diners' continued log-in behavior: Investigating the role of emotions in the O2O meal delivery apps context. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 72:103234. 
  40. Sheth JN, and Venkatesan M. 1968. Risk-reduction processes in repetitive consumer behavior. Journal of Marketing Research 5(3):307-310.  https://doi.org/10.1177/002224376800500311
  41. Wang Q, Kim Y, and Roh T. 2020. Do information and service quality affect perceived privacy protection, satisfaction, and loyalty? Evidence from a Chinese O2O-based mobile shopping application. Telematics and Informatics, 101483. 
  42. Wang YS. 2008. Assessing e-commerce systems success: a respecification and validation of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. Information Systems Journal 18(5):529-557.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00268.x
  43. Xiao S, and Dong M. 2015. Hidden semi-Markov model-based reputation management system for online to offline (O2O) e-commerce markets. Decision Support Systems 77:87-99.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2015.05.013
  44. Xu X, and Huang Y. 2019. Restaurant information cues, Diners' expectations, and need for cognition: Experimental studies of online-to-offline mobile food ordering. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 51:231-241.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.06.010
  45. Yan Q, Wu S, Wang L, Wu P, Chen H, and Wei G. 2016. E-WOM from e-commerce websites and social media: Which will consumers adopt?. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 17:62-73.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elerap.2016.03.004
  46. Yao P, and Li Y. 2024. Why employees continue to use O2O food delivery services? Moderating role of sedentary behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 76:103609. 
  47. Yao P, Osman S, Sabri MF, and Zainudin N. 2023. Do consumers continue to use O2O food delivery services in the post-pandemic era? Roles of sedentary lifestyle. Heliyon, e19131. 
  48. Yeap JA, Ignatius J, and Ramayah T. 2014. Determining consumers' most preferred eWOM platform for movie reviews: A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approach. Computers in Human Behavior 31:250-258.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.10.034
  49. Yeo VCS, Goh SK, and Rezaei S. 2017. Consumer experiences, attitude and behavioral intention toward online food delivery (OFD) services. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services 35:150-162.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.12.013
  50. Yoo CW, Kim YJ, and Sanders GL. 2015. The impact of interactivity of electronic word of mouth systems and E-Quality on decision support in the context of the e-marketplace. Information & Management 52(4):496-505.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2015.03.001
  51. Zhang H, Zhao L, and Gupta S. 2018. The role of online product recommendations on customer decision making and loyalty in social shopping communities. International Journal of Information Management 38(1):150-166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.07.006
  52. Zhang J, Liu F, Tang J, and Li Y. 2019. The online integrated order picking and delivery considering Pickers' learning effects for an O2O community supermarket. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 123:180-199.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.01.013
  53. Zhang T, Agarwal R, and Lucas HC. 2011. The value of IT-enabled retailer learning: personalized product recom- mendations and customer store loyalty in electronic markets. Mis Quarterly:859-881.