DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessing Neurobehavioral Alterations Among E-waste Recycling Workers in Hong Kong

  • Gengze Liao (JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Feng Wang (JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Shaoyou Lu (School of Public Health (Shenzhen), Shenzhen Campus of Sun Yat-sen University) ;
  • Yanny Hoi Kuen Yu (Occupational Safety and Health Council) ;
  • Victoria H. Arrandale (Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto) ;
  • Alan Hoi-shou Chan (Department of Systems Engineering, City University of Hong Kong) ;
  • Lap Ah Tse (JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong)
  • Received : 2023.08.31
  • Accepted : 2023.12.26
  • Published : 2024.03.30

Abstract

Background: E-waste workers in Hong Kong are handling an unprecedented amount of e-waste, which contains various neurotoxic chemicals. However, no study has been conducted to evaluate the neurological health status of e-waste workers in Hong Kong. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of neurobehavioral alterations and to identify the vulnerable groups among Hong Kong e-waste workers. Methods: We recruited 109 Hong Kong e-waste workers from June 2021 to September 2022. Participants completed standard questionnaires and wore a GENEActiv accelerometer for seven days. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and Questionnaire 16/18 (Q16/18) were used to assess subjective neurobehavioral alterations. The GENEActiv data generated objective sleep and circadian rhythm variables. Workers were grouped based on job designation and entity type according to the presumed hazardous level. Unconditional logistic regression models measured the associations of occupational characteristics with neurobehavioral alterations after adjusting for confounders. Results: While dismantlers/repairers and the workers in entities not funded by the government were more likely to suffer from neurotoxic symptoms in Q18 (adjusted odds ratio: 3.18 [1.18-9.39] and 2.77 [1.10-7.46], respectively), the workers from self-sustained recycling facilities also have poor performances in circadian rhythm. Results also showed that the dismantlers/repairers working in entities not funded by the government had the highest risk of neurotoxic symptoms compared to the lowest-risk group (i.e., workers in government-funded companies with other job designations). Conclusion: This timely and valuable study emphasizes the importance of improving the working conditions for high-risk e-waste workers, especially the dismantlers or repairers working in facilities not funded by the government.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank the EcoTech Professional Association of Hong Kong and the Occupational Safety & Health Council, Hong Kong SAR, for their generous help in data collection.

References

  1. Parvez SM, Jahan F, Brune M-N, Gorman JF, Rahman MJ, Carpenter D, Islam Z, Rahman M, Aich N, Knibbs LD. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: an updated systematic review. Lancet Planet Health 2021;5:e905-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00263-1
  2. Rautela R, Arya S, Vishwakarma S, Lee J, Kim K-H, Kumar S. E-waste management and its effects on the environment and human health. Sci Total Environ 2021;773:145623.
  3. Forti V, Balde CP, Kuehr R, Bel G. The Global E-waste Monitor 2020: quantities, flows and the circular economy potential [cited 2023 Jul 24.] Available from: https://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:7737/GEM_2020_def_july1.pdf 2020;2020.
  4. Ongondo FO, Williams ID, Cherrett TJ. How are WEEE doing? A global review of the management of electrical and electronic wastes. Waste Manage 2011;31:714-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2010.10.023
  5. Zeng X, Mathews JA, Li J. Urban mining of e-waste is becoming more costeffective than virgin mining. Environ Sci Technol 2018;52:4835-41. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b04909
  6. Asante KA, Amoyaw-Osei Y, Agusa T. E-waste recycling in Africa: risks and opportunities. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem 2019;18:109-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2019.04.001
  7. Awasthi AK, Wang M, Wang Z, Awasthi MK, Li J. E-waste management in India: a mini-review. Waste Manag Res 2018;36:408-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18767038
  8. Ackah M. Informal E-waste recycling in developing countries: review of metal (loid) s pollution, environmental impacts and transport pathways. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 2017;24:24092-101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0273-y
  9. Orlins S, Guan D. China's toxic informal e-waste recycling: local approaches to a global environmental problem. J Clean Prod 2016;114:71-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.090
  10. Burns KN, Sayler SK, Neitzel RL. Stress, health, noise exposures, and injuries among electronic waste recycling workers in Ghana. J Occup Med Toxicol 2019;14:1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-018-0222-9
  11. Fischer D, Seidu F, Yang J, Felten MK, Garus C, Kraus T, Fobil JN, Kaifie A. Health consequences for e-waste workers and bystandersda comparative cross-sectional study. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:1534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051534
  12. Grant K, Goldizen FC, Sly PD, Brune M-N, Neira M, van den Berg M, Norman RE. Health consequences of exposure to e-waste: a systematic review. Lancet Glob Health 2013;1:e350-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70101-3
  13. Liu W, Huo X, Liu D, Zeng X, Zhang Y, Xu X. S100b in heavy metal-related child attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in an informal e-waste recycling area. NeuroToxicology 2014;45:185-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.10.013
  14. Decharat S. Urinary mercury levels among workers in E-waste shops in Nakhon Si Thammarat Province, Thailand. J Prev Med Public Health 2018;51:196-204. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.18.049
  15. Surenderan S, Murkunde Y. Elucidation of acute and neurobehavioral toxicity of E-waste extracts with special reference to cognitive impairment, anxiety and stress response using zebrafish. Toxicol Environ Health Sci 2019;11:27-35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13530-019-0385-5
  16. Lucchini R, Albini E, Cortesi I, Placidi D, Bergamaschi E, Traversa F, Alessio L. Assessment of neurobehavioral performance as a function of current and cumulative occupational lead exposure. NeuroToxicology 2000;21:805-11.
  17. Liu J, Liu X, Pak V, Wang Y, Yan C, Pinto-Martin J, Dinges D. Early blood lead levels and sleep disturbance in preadolescence. Sleep 2015;38:1869-74. https://doi.org/10.5665/sleep.5230
  18. Wong NWM. Electronic waste governance under "One Country, Two Systems": Hong Kong and mainland China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15.
  19. Ko C. Waste managementeA case study of producer responsibility Scheme (PRS) on waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) in Hong Kong [cited 2023 Jul 17.] Available from: SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=37154042020; 2020.
  20. Ohajinwa CM, van Bodegom PM, Osibanjo O, Xie Q, Chen J, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg W. Health risks of polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and metals at informal electronic waste recycling sites. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019;16:906.
  21. Ignatuschtschenko E. E-waste management in China: bridging the formal and informal sectors. J Chin Gov 2017;2:385-410. https://doi.org/10.1080/23812346.2017.1379629
  22. Buysse DJ, Reynolds 3rd CF, Monk TH, Berman SR, Kupfer DJ. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry Res 1989;28:193-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
  23. Liao G, Huang B, Lee PM, Zhao S, Chan CK, Tai LB, Tsang CYJ, Leung MP, Tse LA. Differences in sleep patterns and mental health problems during different periods of COVID-19 outbreak among community-dwelling older men in Hong Kong. Int J Public Health 2022;67:1604363.
  24. Lundberg I, Hogberg M, Michelsen H, Nise G, Hogstedt C. Evaluation of the Q16 questionnaire on neurotoxic symptoms and a review of its use. Occup Environ Med 1997;54:343-50. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.54.5.343
  25. Ihrig A, Triebig G, Dietz MC. Evaluation of a modified German version of the Q16 questionnaire for neurotoxic symptoms in workers exposed to solvents. Occup Environ Med 2001;58:19-23. https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.58.1.19
  26. Lee PMY, Huang B, Liao G, Chan CK, Tai L-b, Tsang CYJ, Leung CC, Kwan M-P, Tse LA. Changes in physical activity and rest-activity circadian rhythm among Hong Kong community aged population before and during COVID-19. BMC Public Health 2021;21:836.
  27. Iqbal M, Breivik K, Syed JH, Malik RN, Li J, Zhang G, Jones KC. Emerging issue of e-waste in Pakistan: a review of status, research needs and data gaps. Environ Pollut 2015;207:308-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.09.002
  28. Ohajinwa CM, Van Bodegom PM, Vijver MG, Peijnenburg WJ. Health risks awareness of electronic waste workers in the informal sector in Nigeria. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14:911.
  29. Leider PC, Boschman JS, Frings-Dresen MH, van der Molen HF. When is job rotation perceived useful and easy to use to prevent work-related musculoskeletal complaints? Appl Ergon 2015;51:205-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2015.05.004
  30. Asawarungsaengkul K, Tuntitippawan N. The optimal number of workers for job rotation to prevent workers from occupational hazards. In: 2019 research, invention, and innovation congress (RI2C): IEEE 2019. p. 1-6.
  31. Eslinger D, Rowlands AV, Hurst TL, Catt M, Murray P, Eston RG. Validation of the GENEA accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011;43:1085-93. https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0b013e31820513be
  32. Monk TH, Petrie SR, Hayes AJ, Kupfer DJ. Regularity of daily life in relation to personality, age, gender, sleep quality and circadian rhythms. J Sleep Res 1994;3:196-205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.1994.tb00132.x
  33. Wang F, Boros S. The effect of physical activity on sleep quality: a systematic review. Eur J Physiother 2021;23:11-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/21679169.2019.1623314
  34. Yamanaka Y, Honma K-i, Hashimoto S, Takasu N, Miyazaki T, Honma S. Effects of physical exercise on human circadian rhythms. Sleep Biol Rhythms 2006;4:199-206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1479-8425.2006.00234.x
  35. HKRCOC. Message from Chairman [cited 2022 Dec 12.] Available from: http://www.hkrcoc.com/?lang=en 2018; 2018.
  36. Anger WK. Reconsideration of the WHO NCTB strategy and test selection. NeuroToxicology 2014;45:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuro.2014.08.003