DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Implantation of a Newly Designed Supratarsal Gold Weight versus the Traditional Pretarsal Model for the Correction of Long-standing Paralytic Lagophthalmos: A Retrospective Cohort Study

  • Natthiya Lailaksiri (Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital) ;
  • Pawarit Wanichsetakul (Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University) ;
  • Preamjit Saonanon (Department of Ophthalmology, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital)
  • Received : 2023.06.21
  • Accepted : 2023.10.24
  • Published : 2024.03.15

Abstract

Background The study determined to compare the clinical outcomes of traditional gold weight implantation for the correction of paralytic lagophthalmos with those of a newly designed model. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 30 patients (76% females; average age 60.8 ± 12 years) with facial palsy who underwent implantation of either the traditional pretarsal gold weight (PT group; n = 15) or a new supratarsal model (ST group; n = 15) from May 2014 to April 2019. The main outcome measures were the 12-month postoperative weight prominence, weight migration, improvement of lagophthalmos, upper eyelid contour, and upper eyelid ptosis. The secondary outcome was long-term (24 months) reoperative rate. Results The new model group had significantly better eyelid contour (risk ratio [RR] 3.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.62-6.15, p = 0.001), less weight prominence (RR 1.74, 95% CI 1.13-2.70, p = 0.013), less weight migration (RR 1.31, 95% CI 1.12-1.54, p = 0.001), and less eyelid ptosis (RR 2.36, 95% CI 1.21-4.59, p = 0.011) than the traditional model group. Improvement of lagophthalmos was not statistically significant between the two groups (RR 1.44, 95% CI 0.72-2.91, p = 0.303). The 24-month reoperative rate was 53.3% in the PT group versus 13.3% in the ST group (RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.15-3.49, p = 0.015). Conclusion The newly designed supratarsal gold weight showed superior postoperative outcomes than the standard traditional model.

Keywords

References

  1. Garcia RM, Hadlock TA, Klebuc MJ, Simpson RL, Zenn MR, Marcus JR. Contemporary solutions for the treatment of facial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;135(06):1025e-1046e  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000001273
  2. Allen RC. Controversies in periocular reconstruction for facial nerve palsy. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2018;29(05):423-427  https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000510
  3. Rofagha S, Seiff SR. Long-term results for the use of gold eyelid load weights in the management of facial paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125(01):142-149  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a4f2
  4. Bladen JC, Norris JH, Malhotra R. Indications and outcomes for revision of gold weight implants in upper eyelid loading. Br J Ophthalmol 2012;96(04):485-489  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2011-300732
  5. Seiff SR, Sullivan JH, Freeman LN, Ahn J. Pretarsal fixation of gold weights in facial nerve palsy. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1989;5(02):104-109  https://doi.org/10.1097/00002341-198906000-00005
  6. Kim YS, Hwang K. Shape and size of tarsal plates. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27(02):496-497  https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000002369
  7. Choi HY, Hong SE, Lew JM. Long-term comparison of a newly designed gold implant with the conventional implant in facial nerve paralysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999;104(06):1624-1634  https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199911000-00003
  8. Caesar RH, Friebel J, McNab AA. Upper lid loading with gold weights in paralytic lagophthalmos: a modified technique to maximize the long-term functional and cosmetic success. Orbit 2004;23(01):27-32  https://doi.org/10.1076/orbi.23.1.27.28994
  9. Mavrikakis I, Malhotra R. Techniques for upper eyelid loading. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;22(05):325-330  https://doi.org/10.1097/01.iop.0000235817.78695.6f
  10. Rozen S, Lehrman C. Upper eyelid postseptal weight placement for treatment of paralytic lagophthalmos. Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;131(06):1253-1265  https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31828be961
  11. Schrom T, Wernecke K, Thelen A, Knipping S. [Results after lidloading with rigid gold weights-a meta-analysis]. Laryngorhinootologie 2007;86(02):117-123  https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-944748
  12. Saleh GM, Mavrikakis I, de Sousa JL, Xing W, Malhotra R. Corneal astigmatism with upper eyelid gold weight implantation using the combined high pretarsal and levator fixation technique. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2007;23(05):381-383  https://doi.org/10.1097/IOP.0b013e318142cf88
  13. Siah WF, Nagendran S, Tan P, Ali Ahmad SM, Litwin AS, Malhotra R. Late outcomes of gold weights and platinum chains for upper eyelid loading. Br J Ophthalmol 2018;102(02):164-168  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2016-310089
  14. Ben Artsi E, Ullrich K, Brusasco L,Malhotra R. Long-term outcomes of upper eyelid loading with platinum segment chains for lagophthalmos: an adjustable approach. Am J Ophthalmol 2020;214:188-195  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2019.11.025
  15. Berghaus A, Neumann K, Schrom T. The platinum chain: a new upper-lid implant for facial palsy. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2003;5(02):166-170  https://doi.org/10.1001/archfaci.5.2.166
  16. Malhotra R, Ziahosseini K, Poitelea C, Litwin A, Sagili S. Platinum segments: a new platinum chain for adjustable upper eyelid loading. Br J Ophthalmol 2015;99(12):1680-1685  https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-306869
  17. Oh TS, Min K, Song SY, Choi JW, Koh KS. Upper eyelid platinum weight placement for the treatment of paralytic lagophthalmos: a new plane between the inner septum and the levator aponeurosis. Arch Plast Surg 2018;45(03):222-228 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2017.01599