Acknowledgement
This study was completed in part with financial support from a research grant from the Mentor Corporation (grant no: 20-002996).
References
- Alderman AK, Collins ED, Schott A, et al. The impact of breast reconstruction on the delivery of chemotherapy. Cancer 2010;116(07):1791-1800 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24891
- Olfatbakhsh A, Haghighat S, Tabari M, et al. Patient satisfaction and body image following mastectomy, breast-conserving therapy, and mastectomy with reconstruction: a study in Iran. Arch Breast Cancer 2018;5:173-182 https://doi.org/10.32768/abc.201854173-182
- Momoh AO, Cohen WA, Kidwell KM, et al. Tradeoffs associated with contralateral prophylactic mastectomy in women choosing breast reconstruction: results of a prospective multicenter cohort. Ann Surg 2017;266(01):158-164 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000001840
- Jagsi R, Jiang J, Momoh AO, et al. Trends and variation in use of breast reconstruction in patients with breast cancer undergoing mastectomy in the United States. J Clin Oncol 2014;32(09):919-926 https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.52.2284
- Wilkins EG, Alderman AK. Breast reconstruction practices in North America: current trends and future priorities. Paper presented at: Seminars in Plastic Surgery;. 2004
- Panchal H, Matros E. Current trends in post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2017;140( 5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):7S-13S https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003941
- Statistics ANCoPSP. 2019 Plastic Surgery Statistics Report. In: ASPS Arlington Heights. , Illinois; 2019
- Barnsley GP, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg 2006;117(07):2182-2190 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000218184.47372.d5
- Swanson E. Plastic surgeons defend textured breast implants at 2019 US Food and Drug Administration hearing: why it is time to reconsider. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2019;7(08):e2410
- Collett DJ, Rakhorst H, Lennox P, Magnusson M, Cooter R, Deva AK. Current risk estimate of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma in textured breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg 2019;143(3S A Review of Breast Implant-Associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma, 3S):30S-40S https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000005567
- Danilla SV, Jara RP, Miranda F, et al. Is Banning texturized implants to prevent breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma a rational decision? A meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness study. Aesthet Surg J 2020;40(07):721-731 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjz343
- Chun YS, Verma K, Rosen H, et al. Implant-based breast reconstruction using acellular dermal matrix and the risk of postoperative complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010;125(02):429-436 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c82d90
- Kouwenberg CAE, de Ligt KM, Kranenburg LW, et al. Long-term health-related quality of life after four common surgical treatment options for breast cancer and the effect of complications: a retrospective patient-reported survey among 1871 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 2020;146(01):1-13 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000006887
- Lim YM, Park KH, Lee DW, Lew DH, Roh TS, Song SY. Characteristics of adhesion areas between the tissue expander and capsule in implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46(04):330-335 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2018.00395
- Fairchild B, Ellsworth W, Selber JC, et al. Safety and efficacy of smooth surface tissue expander breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 2020;40(01):53-62 https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjy199
- Chiu WK, Fracol M, Feld LN, Qiu CS, Kim JYS. Judging an expander by its cover: a propensity-matched analysis of the impact of tissue expander surface texture on first-stage breast reconstruction outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;147(01):1e-6e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000007417
- Danino MA, Efanov JI, Dimitropoulos G, et al. Capsular biofilm formation at the interface of textured expanders and human acellular dermal matrix: a comparative scanning electron microscopy study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2018;141(04):919-928 https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000004216
- Le NK, Persing S, Dinis J, et al. A comparison of BREAST-Q scores between prepectoral and subpectoral direct-to-implant breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2021;148(05):708e-714e https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000008410
- Manrique OJ, Kapoor T, Banuelos J, et al. Single-stage direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: a comparison between subpectoral versus prepectoral implant placement. Ann Plast Surg 2020;84(04):361-365 https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000002028
- Helme RD, Gibson SJ. The epidemiology of pain in elderly people. Clin Geriatr Med 2001;17(03):417-431, v https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-0690(05)70078-1
- Krueger AB, Stone AA. Assessment of pain: a community-based diary survey in the USA. Lancet 2008;371(9623):1519-1525 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60656-X
- Rustoen T, Wahl AK, Hanestad BR, Lerdal A, Paul S, Miaskowski C. Age and the experience of chronic pain: differences in health and quality of life among younger, middle-aged, and older adults. Clin J Pain 2005;21(06):513-523 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ajp.0000146217.31780.ef
- Walia GS, Aston J, Bello R, et al. Prepectoral versus subpectoral tissue expander placement: a clinical and quality of life outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open 2018;6(04):e1731
- Yang JY, Kim CW, Lee JW, Kim SK, Lee SA, Hwang E. Considerations for patient selection: prepectoral versus subpectoral implant-based breast reconstruction. Arch Plast Surg 2019;46(06):550-557 https://doi.org/10.5999/aps.2019.00353