Clinical and Experimental Reproductive Medicine

The Korean Society for Reproductive Medicine (대한생식의학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Detrimental impact of cell phone radiation on sperm DNA integrity

  • Yeganeh Koohestanidehaghi (Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute) ;
  • Mohammad Ali Khalili (Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute) ;
  • Fatemeh Dehghanpour (Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute) ;
  • Mohammad Sei (Research and Clinical Center for Infertility, Yazd Reproductive Sciences Institute)
  • Received : 2023.05.09
  • Accepted : 2023.08.31
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation (RF-EMR) from various sources may impact health due to the generation of frequency bands. Broad pulses emitted within frequency bands can be absorbed by cells, influencing their function. Numerous laboratory studies have demonstrated that mobile phones-generally the most widely used devices-can have harmful effects on sex cells, such as sperm and oocytes, by producing RF-EMR. Moreover, some research has indicated that RF-EMR generated by mobile phones can influence sperm parameters, including motility, morphology, viability, and (most critically) DNA structure. Consequently, RF-EMR can disrupt both sperm function and fertilization. However, other studies have reported that exposure of spermatozoa to RF-EMR does not affect the functional parameters or genetic structure of sperm. These conflicting results likely stem from differences among studies in the duration and exposure distance, as well as the species of animal used. This report was undertaken to review the existing research discussing the effects of RF-EMR on the DNA integrity of mammalian spermatozoa.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Conceptualization: YK, MAK. Visualization: YK. Writing-original draft: MAK, FD. Writing-review & editing: YK, MAK, FD, MS.

References

  1. Imani M, Talebi AR, Fesahat F, Rahiminia T, Seifati SM, Dehghanpour F. Sperm parameters, DNA integrity, and protamine expression in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. J Obstet Gynaecol 2021;41:439-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443615.2020.1744114
  2. Doostabadi MR, Mangoli E, Marvast LD, Dehghanpour F, Maleki B, Torkashvand H, et al. Microfluidic devices employing chemo- and thermotaxis for sperm selection can improve sperm parameters and function in patients with high DNA fragmentation. Andrologia 2022;54:e14623.
  3. Dehghanpour F, Tabibnejad N, Fesahat F, Yazdinejad F, Talebi AR. Evaluation of sperm protamine deficiency and apoptosis in infertile men with idiopathic teratozoospermia. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2017;44:73-8. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2017.44.2.73
  4. Magalhaes JA, Ribeiro LS, Rego JP, Andrade CR. Current markers for infertility in men. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021;25:592-600. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20210013
  5. Krausz C, Riera-Escamilla A. Genetics of male infertility. Nat Rev Urol 2018;15:369-84. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-018-0003-3
  6. Eisenberg ML, Kim S, Chen Z, Sundaram R, Schisterman EF, Buck Louis GM. The relationship between male BMI and waist circumference on semen quality: data from the LIFE study. Hum Reprod 2014;29:193-200. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det428
  7. Taha EA, Ez-Aldin AM, Sayed SK, Ghandour NM, Mostafa T. Effect of smoking on sperm vitality, DNA integrity, seminal oxidative stress, zinc in fertile men. Urology 2012;80:822-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.07.002
  8. Sharma R, Harlev A, Agarwal A, Esteves SC. Cigarette smoking and semen quality: a new meta-analysis examining the effect of the 2010 World Health Organization laboratory methods for the examination of human semen. Eur Urol 2016;70:635-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2016.04.010
  9. Ricci E, Al Beitawi S, Cipriani S, Candiani M, Chiaffarino F, Vigano P, et al. Semen quality and alcohol intake: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online 2017;34:38-47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.09.012
  10. Sokolakis I, Hatzichristodoulou G. Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy among urologist practitioners: how the opinion of urologists changed between 2016 and 2019. Int J Impot Res 2022;34:317-9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41443-020-00394-4
  11. Agarwal A, Desai NR, Makker K, Varghese A, Mouradi R, Sabanegh E, et al. Effects of radiofrequency electromagnetic waves (RF-EMW) from cellular phones on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro pilot study. Fertil Steril 2009;92:1318-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.08.022
  12. Agarwal A, Singh A, Hamada A, Kesari K. Cell phones and male infertility: a review of recent innovations in technology and consequences. Int Braz J Urol 2011;37:432-54. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-55382011000400002
  13. Gautam R, Priyadarshini E, Nirala J, Rajamani P. Impact of nonionizing electromagnetic radiation on male infertility: an assessment of the mechanism and consequences. Int J Radiat Biol 2022;98:1063-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2020.1859154
  14. Repacholi MH. Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs. Bioelectromagnetics 1998;19:1-19. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1521-186X(1998)19:1<1::AID-BEM1>3.0.CO;2-5
  15. De Iuliis GN, Newey RJ, King BV, Aitken RJ. Mobile phone radiation induces reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage in human spermatozoa in vitro. PLoS One 2009;4:e6446.
  16. Falahati SA, Anvari M, Khalili MA. Effects of combined magnetic fields on human sperm parameters. Iran J Radiat Res 2011;9:195-200.
  17. Kang N, Shang XJ, Huang YF. Impact of cell phone radiation on male reproduction. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2010;16:1027-30.
  18. Tawadrous GA, Aziz AA, Mostafa T. Effect of smoking status on seminal parameters and apoptotic markers in infertile men. J Urol 2011;186:1986-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.06.061
  19. Ulcek JL, Cleveland RF. OET bulletin 65: Evaluating compliance with FCC guidelines for human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields [Internet]. Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering & Technology; 1997 [cited 2023 Oct 4]. Available from: https://transition.fcc.gov/Bureaus/Engineering_Technology/Documents/bulletins/oet65/oet65b.pdf
  20. Habash R. Bioeffects and therapeutic applications of electromagnetic energy. CRC press; 2007.
  21. Kowalczuk CI, Saunders RD, Stapleton HR. Sperm count and sperm abnormality in male mice after exposure to 2.45 GHz microwave radiation. Mutat Res 1983;122:155-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-7992(83)90054-4
  22. Koppers AJ, De Iuliis GN, Finnie JM, McLaughlin EA, Aitken RJ. Significance of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species in the generation of oxidative stress in spermatozoa. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2008;93:3199-207. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-2616
  23. Wang SM, Wang DW, Peng RY, Gao YB, Yang Y, Hu WH, et al. Effect of electromagnetic pulse irradiation on structure and function of Leydig cells in mice. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2003;9:327-30.
  24. Kumar S, Nirala JP, Behari J, Paulraj R. Effect of electromagnetic irradiation produced by 3G mobile phone on male rat reproductive system in a simulated scenario. Indian J Exp Biol 2014;52:890-7.
  25. Sarkar S, Ali S, Behari J. Effect of low power microwave on the mouse genome: a direct DNA analysis. Mutat Res 1994;320:141-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1218(94)90066-3
  26. Malyapa RS, Ahern EW, Straube WL, Moros EG, Pickard WF, Roti Roti JL. Measurement of DNA damage after exposure to electromagnetic radiation in the cellular phone communication frequency band (835.62 and 847.74 MHz). Radiat Res 1997;148:618-27. https://doi.org/10.2307/3579738
  27. Giwercman A, Richthoff J, Hjollund H, Bonde JP, Jepson K, Frohm B, et al. Correlation between sperm motility and sperm chromatin structure assay parameters. Fertil Steril 2003;80:1404-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0015-0282(03)02212-X
  28. Erogul O, Oztas E, Yildirim I, Kir T, Aydur E, Komesli G, et al. Effects of electromagnetic radiation from a cellular phone on human sperm motility: an in vitro study. Arch Med Res 2006;37:840-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2006.05.003
  29. Agarwal A, Deepinder F, Sharma RK, Ranga G, Li J. Effect of cell phone usage on semen analysis in men attending infertility clinic: an observational study. Fertil Steril 2008;89:124-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.166
  30. Narayanan SN, Kumar RS, Potu BK, Nayak S, Mailankot M. Spatial memory performance of Wistar rats exposed to mobile phone. Clinics (Sao Paulo) 2009;64:231-4. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1807-59322009000300014
  31. Koohestanidehaghi Y, Torkamanpari M, Shirmohamadi Z, Lorian K, Vatankhah M. The effect of cysteine and glutamine on human sperm functional parameters during vitrification. Andrologia 2021;53:e13870.
  32. Neumann E, Schaefer-Ridder M, Wang Y, Hofschneider PH. Gene transfer into mouse lyoma cells by electroporation in high electric fields. EMBO J 1982;1:841-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1982.tb01257.x
  33. Berridge MV, Tan AS. High-capacity redox control at the plasma membrane of mammalian cells: trans-membrane, cell surface, and serum NADH-oxidases. Antioxid Redox Signal 2000;2:231-42. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2000.2.2-231
  34. Friedman J, Kraus S, Hauptman Y, Schiff Y, Seger R. Mechanism of short-term ERK activation by electromagnetic fields at mobile phone frequencies. Biochem J 2007;405:559-68. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20061653
  35. Ghorbani F, Nasiri Z, Koohestanidehaghi Y, Lorian K. The antioxidant roles of L-carnitine and N-acetyl cysteine against oxidative stress on human sperm functional parameters during vitrification. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2021;48:316-21. https://doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2021.04560
  36. Blank M, Goodman R. Electromagnetic fields may act directly on DNA. J Cell Biochem 1999;75:369-74. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4644(19991201)75:3<369::AID-JCB2>3.0.CO;2-A
  37. Ribeiro EP, Rhoden EL, Horn MM, Rhoden C, Lima LP, Toniolo L. Effects of subchronic exposure to radio frequency from a conventional cellular telephone on testicular function in adult rats. J Urol 2007;177:395-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2006.08.083
  38. Balci M, Devrim E, Durak I. Effects of mobile phones on oxidant/antioxidant balance in cornea and lens of rats. Curr Eye Res 2007;32:21-5. https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680601114948
  39. Hamada AJ, Singh A, Agarwal A. Cell phones and their impact on male fertility: fact or fiction. Open Reprod Sci J 2011;3:125-37. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874255601103010125
  40. Zalata A, El-Samanoudy AZ, Shaalan D, El-Baiomy Y, Mostafa T. In vitro effect of cell phone radiation on motility, DNA fragmentation and clusterin gene expression in human sperm. Int J Fertil Steril 2015;9:129-36.
  41. Veerachari SB, Vasan SS. Mobile phone electromagnetic waves and its effect on human ejaculated semen: an in vitro study. Int J Infertil Fetal Med 2012;3:15-21. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10016-1034
  42. Schulte RT, Ohl DA, Sigman M, Smith GD. Sperm DNA damage in male infertility: etiologies, assays, and outcomes. J Assist Reprod Genet 2010;27:3-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9359-x
  43. Mostafa RM, Elmoemen EA, Fawzy MS, Hagras AM. Possible impact (s) of cell phone electromagnetic radiation on human sperm parameters. Hum Androl 2012;2:49-55. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.XHA.0000415089.15301.51
  44. Falzone N, Huyser C, Franken DR, Leszczynski D. Mobile phone radiation does not induce pro-apoptosis effects in human spermatozoa. Radiat Res 2010;174:169-76. https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2091.1
  45. Zhao TY, Zou SP, Knapp PE. Exposure to cell phone radiation up-regulates apoptosis genes in primary cultures of neurons and astrocytes. Neurosci Lett 2007;412:34-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2006.09.092
  46. Sun Y, Lin Y, Li H, Liu J, Sheng X, Zhang W. 2,5-Hexanedione induces human ovarian granulosa cell apoptosis through BCL-2, BAX, and CASPASE-3 signaling pathways. Arch Toxicol 2012;86:205-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00204-011-0745-7
  47. Liu Q, Si T, Xu X, Liang F, Wang L, Pan S. Electromagnetic radiation at 900 MHz induces sperm apoptosis through bcl-2, bax and caspase-3 signaling pathways in rats. Reprod Health 2015;12:65.
  48. Aitken RJ, Bennetts LE, Sawyer D, Wiklendt AM, King BV. Impact of radio frequency electromagnetic radiation on DNA integrity in the male germline. Int J Androl 2005;28:171-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2605.2005.00531.x
  49. Kesari KK, Behari J. Evidence for mobile phone radiation exposure effects on reproductive pattern of male rats: role of ROS. Electromagn Biol Med 2012;31:213-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/15368378.2012.700292
  50. Lai H, Singh NP. Single- and double-strand DNA breaks in rat brain cells after acute exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation. Int J Radiat Biol 1996;69:513-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/095530096145814
  51. Dasdag S, Akdag MZ, Ulukaya E, Uzunlar AK, Yegin D. Mobile phone exposure does not induce apoptosis on spermatogenesis in rats. Arch Med Res 2008;39:40-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2007.06.013
  52. Durairajanayagam D, Agarwal A, Ong C. Causes, effects and molecular mechanisms of testicular heat stress. Reprod Biomed Online 2015;30:14-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.09.018
  53. Kesari KK, Kumar S, Behari J. Mobile phone usage and male infertility in Wistar rats. Indian J Exp Biol 2010;48:987-92.
  54. Hassanzadeh-Taheri M, Khalili MA, Hosseininejad Mohebati A, Zardast M, Hosseini M, Palmerini MG, et al. The detrimental effect of cell phone radiation on sperm biological characteristics in normozoospermic. Andrologia 2022;54:e14257.
  55. Nyberg NR, McCredden JE, Weller SG, Hardell L. The European Union prioritises economics over health in the rollout of radiofrequency technologies. Rev Environ Health 2022 Sep 22 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1515/reveh-2022-0106