Acknowledgement
본 연구는 산업통상자원부(MOTIE) 및 한국에너지기술평가원(KETEP)의 2020년의 산업기술혁신사업 지원으로 수행되었습니다.(No. 20203010040010, 수소전기차 다차종 동시충전을 위한 광역수소충전소 핵심기술 개발)
References
- MOTIE, Hydrogen Safety Management Roadmap 2.0, Energy Safety Division, Ministry of Trade, Industry, Energy, (2023)
- I, Glassman., Combustion, 3rd ed., New York: Academic Press, (1996)
- Kim, H. J ., and Jung, E. S.,"A Study on Safety Guidelines for Hydrogen Refueling Stations at Expressway Service Area using Quantitative Risk Assessment", KHNES, 32(6), 551-564, (2021) https://doi.org/10.7316/KHNES.2021.32.6.551
- Joe, C. H., and Kim. D. H.,"Quantitative risk assessment of a mobile hydrogen refueling station in korea", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(78), 33541-33549,
- Kiyotaka, T.,"Quantitative risk assessment of the interior of a hydrogen refueling station considering safety barrier systems", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 44(41), 23522-23531, (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2019.07.027
- Kang, S. K., "A Study on Safety Improvement for Packaged Hydrogen Refueling Station by Risk Assessment", KHNES, 28(6), (2017)
- Kim, K. Y., and Jeong, Y. J., Technical Guidelines for Accident Damage Prediction, KOSHA GUIDE P-102-2021, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, (2021)
- Brian D, Ehrhart., and Ethan. S. Hecht., "Hydrogen Plus Other Alternative Fuels Risk Assessment Models (HyRAM+) Version 5.0 Technical Reference Manual, SAND2022-16425, Sandia National Laboratories, (2022)
- JL, Woodward., Source Modeling-Discharge Rates, Process safety Baker Eng. and Risk Consultants, Inc., San Antonio, TX, USA, (2014)
- Katrina M, Groth, Jeffrey L. LaChance, and Aaron P. Harris., Early-Stage Quantitative Risk Assessment to Support Development of Codes and Standard Requirements for Indoor Fueling of Hydrogen Vehicles, SAND2012-10150", Sandia National Laboratories, (2012)
- P. A.M, Uijt de Haag, and B.J.M. Ale., Guideline for quantitative risk assessment, Purple book Part one CPR-RE, TNO, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment(RVIM), (2005)
- Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Guidelines for Describing Worst case and Alternative Accident Scenarios, KOSHA GUIDE P-107- 2020, (2020)
- Korea Gas Safety, Facility/Technical/Inspection Code for Fuel Vehicles Refueling by Type of Compressed Hydrogen Delivery, KGS CODE FP 217, (2022)
- C, J. H. Van den Bosch, R.A.P.M. Weterings., Methods for the calculation of physical effects, Yellow book CPR 14E, TNO, Ministere van Verkeer en Waterstaat, Third edition, (2005)
- HSE, Indicative human vulnerability to the hazardous agents present offshore for application in risk assessment of major accidents, HID Semi Permanent Circular no. SPC/Tech/OSD/30. [Online]., (2010) [cited 2023. Available from: https://www.hse.gov.uk/foi/internalops/hid_circs/technical_osd/spc_tech_osd_30/]
- IOGP, "Risk Assessment Data Directory, Vulnerability of humans", International Association of Oil&Gas Producers, 434(14), 2023
- V, J. Clancey, Diagnostic Features of Explosion Damage, paper presented at the sixth International Meeting of Foren-sic Sciences, Edinburgh, (1972)
- Daniel A, Crowl., and Joseph F, Louvar., Chemical Process Safety, Fundamentals with Applications, Third edition, Pearson Education, Inc., Prentice hall international series in the physical and chemical engineering sciences, (2011)
- Ir, A.J. Roos., Ir, W.P.M. Merx, Methods for the determination of possible damage, TNO Green book, First edition, (1992)
- Center for Chemical Process Safety, Guidelines for Developing Quantitative Safety Risk Criteria, Appendix B, American Institute of Chemical Engineers, INC., (2009)
- Korea Gas Safety Corp., Guidelines for Safety Impact Assessment of Hydrogen vehicle refueling station, (2022)