Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

  • 제49권1호
  • /
  • Pages.10.1-10.8
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2234-7658(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2234-7666(eISSN)
대한치과보존학회 (The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

YouTube as a source of information about rubber dam: quality and content analysis

  • Gulsen Kiraz (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University) ;
  • Arzu Kaya Mumcu (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University) ;
  • Safa Kurnaz (Department of Endodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kutahya Health Sciences University)
  • 투고 : 2023.11.10
  • 심사 : 2023.12.21
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the content, quality and demographics of YouTube videos about rubber dam as an information source for clinicians and dental students. Materials and Methods: "Rubber dam," "rubber dam application," "dental isolation," "rubber dam isolation," and "dental dam" were determined as keywords for the detection of YouTube videos related to rubber dam. Seventy 3 videos were evaluated and a total of 34 videos met the inclusion criteria. All selected videos were evaluated according to 8 parameters. The videos were scored 1 if the videos contained information about the selected parameter, but if the videos did not contain enough information, they were scored 0. The data were statistically analyzed with the analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test (p < 0.05). Results: We found that 41% of the videos have poor, 47% have moderate, and 12% have good information. There is a statistically significant difference in time between poor and good information content (p < 0.05). There is a statistically significant difference between the poor and good information in the video information and quality index 1. Conclusions: Rubber dam-related videos available on YouTube are generally moderately informed and insufficient. YouTube is currently not sufficient as a source of information for patients and clinicians at the moment. The YouTube platform should be developed and enriched with quality information on current and dental issues.

키워드

과제정보

This study was presented as an oral presentation at the Turkish Dentists Association 27th International Congress of Turkish Dentistry on October 26-29, 2023 in Ankara, Turkey.

참고문헌

  1. Kakehashi S, Stanley HR, Fitzgerald RJ. The effects of surgical exposures of dental pulps in germ-free and conventional laboratory rats. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1965;20:340-349.
  2. Fabricius L, Dahlen G, Ohman AE, Moller AJ. Predominant indigenous oral bacteria isolated from infected root canals after varied times of closure. Scand J Dent Res 1982;90:134-144.
  3. Ahmad IA. Rubber dam usage for endodontic treatment: a review. Int Endod J 2009;42:963-972.
  4. Winkler R. Sanford Christie Barnum--inventor of the rubber dam. Quintessenz 1991;42:483-486.
  5. Madarati AA. Why dentists don't use rubber dam during endodontics and how to promote its usage? BMC Oral Health 2016;16:24.
  6. Patel S, Hamer S. A simple guide to using dental dam. Br Dent J 2021;230:644-650.
  7. European Society of Endodontology. Quality guidelines for endodontic treatment: consensus report of the European Society of Endodontology. Int Endod J 2006;39:921-930.
  8. Mala S, Lynch CD, Burke FM, Dummer PM. Attitudes of final year dental students to the use of rubber dam. Int Endod J 2009;42:632-638.
  9. Petersson K, Olsson H, Soderstrom C, Fouilloux I, Jegat N, Levy G. Undergraduate education in endodontology at 2 European dental schools: a comparison between the Faculty of Odontology, Malmo University, Malmo, Sweden and Faculty of Odontolgy, Paris 5 University (Rene Descartes), France. Eur J Dent Educ 2002;6:176-181.
  10. Kaval ME, Kandemir Demirci G, Atesci AA, Sarsar F, Dindaroglu F, Guneri P, et al. YouTubeTM as an information source for regenerative endodontic treatment procedures: quality and content analysis. Int J Med Inform 2022;161:104732.
  11. Kumar N, Pandey A, Venkatraman A, Garg N. Are video sharing web sites a useful source of information on hypertension? J Am Soc Hypertens 2014;8:481-490.
  12. Abukaraky A, Hamdan AA, Ameera MN, Nasief M, Hassona Y. Quality of YouTube TM videos on dental implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2018;23:e463-e468.
  13. Jung MJ, Seo MS. Assessment of reliability and information quality of YouTube videos about root canal treatment after 2016. BMC Oral Health 2022;22:494.
  14. Jamleh A, Aljohani SM, Alzamil FF, Aljuhayyim SM, Alsubaei MN, Alali SR, et al. Assessment of the educational value of endodontic access cavity preparation YouTube video as a learning resource for students. PLoS One 2022;17:e0272765.
  15. Nason K, Donnelly A, Duncan HF. YouTube as a patient-information source for root canal treatment. Int Endod J 2016;49:1194-1200.
  16. Cesur Aydin K, Gunec HG. Quality of information on YouTube about artificial intelligence in dental radiology. J Dent Educ 2020;84:1166-1172.
  17. Nason GJ, Kelly P, Kelly ME, Burke MJ, Aslam A, Giri SK, et al. YouTube as an educational tool regarding male urethral catheterization. Scand J Urol 2015;49:189-192.
  18. Bylund CL, Gueguen JA, Sabee CM, Imes RS, Li Y, Sanford AA. Provider-patient dialogue about Internet health information: an exploration of strategies to improve the provider-patient relationship. Patient Educ Couns 2007;66:346-352.
  19. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, Catania J, Lee K, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: national U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res 2003;5:e17.
  20. Ho A, McGrath C, Mattheos N. Social media patient testimonials in implant dentistry: information or misinformation? Clin Oral Implants Res 2017;28:791-800.
  21. Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Marahleh A, Scully C. YouTube as a source of information on mouth (oral) cancer. Oral Dis 2016;22:202-208.
  22. Delli K, Livas C, Vissink A, Spijkervet FK. Is YouTube useful as a source of information for Sjogren's syndrome? Oral Dis 2016;22:196-201.
  23. ElKarmi R, Hassona Y, Taimeh D, Scully C. YouTube as a source for parents' education on early childhood caries. Int J Paediatr Dent 2017;27:437-443.
  24. Yagci F. Evaluation of YoutubeTM as a source of information about digital dentistry. Selcuk Dent J 2021;8:296-302.
  25. Buyukcavus MH, Kurnaz S. Are YouTubeTM videos a reliable source of information about root resorption? Forum Ortod 2020;16:201-209.
  26. Demirci GK, Dindaroglu F. YouTubeTM as an information source on emergency treatment of traumatic dental injuries: cross-sectional content analysis. Selcuk Dent J 2021;8:808-816.
  27. Jamleh A, Nassar M, Alissa H, Alfadley A. Evaluation of YouTube videos for patients' education on periradicular surgery. PLoS One 2021;16:e0261309.
  28. Brockfeld T, Muller B, de Laffolie J. Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results. Med Educ Online 2018;23:1555434.
  29. Paegle RD, Wilkinson EJ, Donnelly MB. Videotaped vs traditional lectures for medical students. Med Educ 1980;14:387-393.
  30. Kalludi S, Punja D, Rao R, Dhar M. Is video podcast supplementation as a learning aid beneficial to dental students? J Clin Diagn Res 2015;9:CC04-CC07.
  31. Burns LE, Abbassi E, Qian X, Mecham A, Simeteys P, Mays KA. YouTube use among dental students for learning clinical procedures: a multi-institutional study. J Dent Educ 2020;84:1151-1158.
  32. Mukhopadhyay S, Kruger E, Tennant M. YouTube: a new way of supplementing traditional methods in dental education. J Dent Educ 2014;78:1568-1571.
  33. Seo CW, Cho AR, Park JC, Cho HY, Kim S. Dental students' learning attitudes and perceptions of YouTube as a lecture video hosting platform in a flipped classroom in Korea. J Educ Eval Health Prof 2018;15:24. 
  34. Duncan I, Yarwood-Ross L, Haigh C. YouTube as a source of clinical skills education. Nurse Educ Today 2013;33:1576-1580.
  35. Ahmed HM, Cohen S, Levy G, Steier L, Bukiet F. Rubber dam application in endodontic practice: an update on critical educational and ethical dilemmas. Aust Dent J 2014;59:457-463.
  36. Kapitan M, Suchankova Kleplova T, Suchanek J. A comparison of three rubber dam systems in vivo--a preliminary study. Acta Med (Hradec Kralove) 2015;58:15-20.
  37. Anabtawi MF, Gilbert GH, Bauer MR, Reams G, Makhija SK, Benjamin PL, et al. Rubber dam use during root canal treatment: findings from the Dental Practice-Based Research Network. J Am Dent Assoc 2013;144:179-186.
  38. Samaranayake LP, Reid J, Evans D. The efficacy of rubber dam isolation in reducing atmospheric bacterial contamination. ASDC J Dent Child 1989;56:442-444.
  39. Lo AS, Esser MJ, Gordon KE. YouTube: a gauge of public perception and awareness surrounding epilepsy. Epilepsy Behav 2010;17:541-545.
  40. Lena Y, Dindaroglu F. Lingual orthodontic treatment: a YouTubeTM video analysis. Angle Orthod 2018;88:208-214.
  41. Kovalski LN, Cardoso FB, D'Avila OP, Correa AP, Martins MA, Martins MD, et al. Is the YouTubeTM an useful source of information on oral leukoplakia? Oral Dis 2019;25:1897-1905.
  42. Cassidy JT, Fitzgerald E, Cassidy ES, Cleary M, Byrne DP, Devitt BM, et al. YouTube provides poor information regarding anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26:840-845.
  43. Ozdal Zincir O, Bozkurt AP, Gas S. Potential patient education of YouTube videos related to wisdom tooth surgical removal. J Craniofac Surg 2019;30:e481-e484.