Restorative Dentistry and Endodontics

The Korean Academy of Conservative Dentistry (대한치과보존학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Color discrepancy of single-shade composites at different distances from the interface measured using cell phone images

  • Received : 2023.11.13
  • Accepted : 2023.12.15
  • Published : 2024.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of substrate color and interface distance on the color adjustment of 2 single-shade composites, Vittra APS Unique and Charisma Diamond One. Materials and Methods: Dual disc-shaped specimens were created using Vittra APS Unique or Charisma Diamond One as the center composite, surrounded by shaded composites (A1 or A3). Color measurements were taken with a spectrophotometer against a gray background, recording the color coordinates in the CIELAB color space. Illumination with a light-correcting device and image acquisition using a polarizing filter-equipped cell phone were performed on specimens over the same background. Image processing software was used to measure the color coordinates in the center and periphery of the inner composite and in the outer composite. The color data were then converted to CIELAB coordinates and adjusted using data from the spectrophotometer. Color differences (ΔE00) between the center/periphery of single-shade and outer composites were calculated, along with color changes in single-shade composites caused by different outer composites. Color differences for the inner composites surrounded by A1 and A3 were also calculated. Data were analyzed using repeated-measures analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Results: The results showed that color discrepancies were lowest near the interface and when the outer composite was whiter (A1). Additionally, Charisma Diamond One exhibited better color adjustment ability than Vittra APS Unique. Conclusions: Color discrepancies between the investigated single-shade composites diminished towards the interface with the surrounding composite, particularly when the latter exhibited a lighter shade.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

G.J.S.L. is grateful to The National Council of Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for the research fellowship.

References

  1. Trifkovic B, Powers JM, Paravina RD. Color adjustment potential of resin composites. Clin Oral Investig 2018;22:1601-1607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-017-2260-6
  2. Barros MS, Silva PF, Santana ML, Braganca RM, Faria-E-Silva AL. Effect of surrounded shade and specimen's thickness on color adjustment potential of a single-shade composite. Braz Dent J 2022;33:126-132. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6440202204973
  3. Barros MS, Silva PF, Santana ML, Braganca RM, Faria-E-Silva AL. Effects of surrounding and underlying shades on the color adjustment potential of a single-shade composite used in a thin layer. Restor Dent Endod 2023;48:e7.
  4. de Abreu JL, Sampaio CS, Benalcazar Jalkh EB, Hirata R. Analysis of the color matching of universal resin composites in anterior restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:269-276. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12659
  5. Korkut B, Unal T, Can E. Two-year retrospective evaluation of monoshade universal composites in direct veneer and diastema closure restorations. J Esthet Restor Dent 2023;35:525-537. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12992
  6. Forabosco E, Consolo U, Mazzitelli C, Kaleci S, Generali L, Checchi V. Effect of bleaching on the color match of single-shade resin composites. J Oral Sci 2023;65:232-236. https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.23-0159
  7. Durand LB, Ruiz-Lopez J, Perez BG, Ionescu AM, Carrillo-Perez F, Ghinea R, et al. Color, lightness, chroma, hue, and translucency adjustment potential of resin composites using CIEDE2000 color difference formula. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:836-843. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12689
  8. Barros MS, Silva PF, Santana ML, Braganca RM, Faria-E-Silva AL. Background and surrounding colors affect the color blending of a single-shade composite. Braz Oral Res 2023;37:e035.
  9. de Melo Oliveira I, Santana TR, Correia AC, Fontes LS, Griza S, Faria-E-Silva AL. Color heterogeneity and individual color changes in dentin and enamel bleached in the presence of a metallic orthodontic bracket. J Esthet Restor Dent 2021;33:262-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12660
  10. de Livi GJ, Santana TR, Braganca RM, de Braganca Garcez RM, Faria-E-Silva AL. The role of interface distance and underlying substrate on the color adjustment potential of single-shade composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2023;35:1279-1285. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13104
  11. Tam WK, Lee HJ. Dental shade matching using a digital camera. J Dent 2012;40 Supplement 2:e3-e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2012.06.004
  12. Lazar R, Culic B, Gasparik C, Lazar C, Dudea D. The accuracy of dental shade matching using cross-polarization photography. Int J Comput Dent 2019;22:343-351. PUBMED
  13. de Braganca RM, Moraes RR, Faria-E-Silva AL. Color assessment of resin composite by using cellphone images compared with a spectrophotometer. Restor Dent Endod 2021;46:e23.
  14. Rondon LF, Ramirez R, Pecho OE. Comparison of visual shade matching and photographic shade analysis. J Esthet Restor Dent 2022;34:374-382. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12883
  15. Brokos I, Polychronakis N, Polyzois G, Lagouvardos P, Krejci I. Illuminant metameric effects on interbrand and intrabrand color differences of direct composite resins. J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1342-1349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2021.04.006
  16. Yilmaz B, Dede DO, Diker E, Fonseca M, Johnston WM, Kucukekenci AS. Effect of cross-polarization filters on the trueness of colors obtained with a single-lens reflex camera, macro lens, and a ring flash. J Esthet Restor Dent 2023;35:878-885. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13053
  17. Soares KD, Braganca RM, Leal PC, Schneider LF, Faria-e-Silva AL. Is it possible to determine the optical properties of resin composites with clinical spectrophotometers? Color Res Appl 2022;47:706-716. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22757
  18. ISO 11664-2:2007. Colorimetry - Part 2: CIE standard illuminants. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2007.
  19. ISO/CIE 11664-1:2019. Colorimetry - Part 1: CIE standard colorimetric observers. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2019.
  20. Araujo FS, Barros MC, Santana ML, de Jesus Oliveira LS, Silva PF, Lima GD, et al. Effects of adhesive used as modeling liquid on the stability of the color and opacity of composites. J Esthet Restor Dent 2018;30:427-433. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12378
  21. Carney MN, Johnston WM. A novel regression model from RGB image data to spectroradiometric correlates optimized for tooth colored shades. J Dent 2016;51:45-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2016.05.011
  22. Luo MR, Cui BR, Rigg B. The development of the CIE 2000 colour-difference formula: CIEDE2000. Color Res Appl 2001;26:340-350. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.1049
  23. Sharma G, Wu W, Dalal EM. The CIEDE2000 color-difference formula: Implementation notes, supplementary test data, and mathematical observations. Color Res Appl 2005;30:21-30. https://doi.org/10.1002/col.20070
  24. Paravina RD, Ghinea R, Herrera LJ, Bona AD, Igiel C, Linninger M, et al. Color difference thresholds in dentistry. J Esthet Restor Dent 2015;27 Supplement 1:S1-S9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12149
  25. Nixon M, Outlaw F, Leung TS. Accurate device-independent colorimetric measurements using smartphones. PLoS One 2020;15:e0230561.