Journal of the korean academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회지)

Korean Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (대한소아치과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment of Wear Resistance in Tooth-Colored Materials for Primary Molar Crown Restoration in Pediatric Dentistry

  • Hyun Seok Kang (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Yooseok Shin (Department of Conservative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Chung-Min Kang (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University) ;
  • Je Seon Song (Department of Pediatric Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Yonsei University)
  • Received : 2023.08.30
  • Accepted : 2023.10.18
  • Published : 2024.02.29
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the wear resistance of tooth-colored materials used in crown restoration for primary molars with a chewing simulator. In this study, four groups-three experimental groups and one control group-were included. They consisted of three-dimensional (3D) printed resin crowns (NextDent and Graphy), milled nano-hybrid ceramic crowns (MAZIC Duro), and prefabricated zirconia crowns (NuSmile). Twelve mandibular second molar specimens were prepared from each group. In the wear experiment, 6.0 × 105 cycles were conducted with a force of 50 N, and a 6 mm-diameter steatite ball was used as an antagonist. The amount of wear was calculated by comparing the scan files before and after the chewing simulation using 3D metrology software, and the worn cross-section was confirmed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The resin and ceramic groups did not exhibit any statistically significant differences. However, compared to other crown groups, the zirconia crown group demonstrated notably reduced levels of wear (p < 0.05). In SEM images, layers and cracks were observed in the 3D-printed resin crown groups, which differed from those in the other groups.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by the Korea Medical Device Development Fund grant funded by the Korea government (the Ministry of Science and ICT) (Project Number: 1711138576, KMDF_PR_20200901_0260).

References

  1. Randall RC : Preformed metal crowns for primary and permanent molar teeth: review of the literature. Pediatr Dent, 24:489-500, 2002.
  2. Seale NS, Randall R : The use of stainless steel crowns: a systematic literature review. Pediatr Dent, 37:145-160, 2015.
  3. Shah PV, Lee JY, Wright JT : Clinical success and parental satisfaction with anterior preveneered primary stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 26:391-395, 2004.
  4. Roberts C, Lee JY, Wright JT : Clinical evaluation of and parental satisfaction with resin-faced stainless steel crowns. Pediatr Dent, 23:28-31, 2001.
  5. Mathew MG, Roopa KB, Soni AJ, Khan MM, Kauser A : Evaluation of clinical success, parental and child satisfaction of stainless steel crowns and zirconia crowns in primary molars. J Fam Med Prim Care, 9:1418-1423, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1006_19
  6. Morley J : The role of cosmetic dentistry in restoring a youthful appearance. J Am Dent Assoc, 130:1166-1172, 1999. https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0370
  7. Ajayakumar LP, Chowdhary N, Reddy VR, Chowdhary R : Use of restorative full crowns made with zirconia in children: a systematic review. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent, 13:551-558, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1822
  8. Aiem E, Smail-Faugeron V, Muller-Bolla M : Aesthetic preformed paediatric crowns: systematic review. Int J Pediatr Dent, 27:273-282, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12260
  9. Al-Amleh B, Lyons K, Swain M : Clinical trials in zirconia: a systematic review. J Oral Rehabil, 37:641-652, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02094.x
  10. Holsinger DM, Wells MH, Scarbecz M, Donaldson M : Clinical evaluation and parental satisfaction with pediatric zirconia anterior crowns. Pediatr Dent, 38:192-197, 2016.
  11. Walia T, Salami AA, Bashiri R, Hamoodi OM, Rashid F : A randomised controlled trial of three aesthetic full-coronal restorations in primary maxillary teeth. Eur J Paediatr Dent, 15:113-118, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40368-013-0072-1
  12. Manfredini D, Restrepo C, Diaz-Serrano K, Winocur E, Lobbezoo F : Prevalence of sleep bruxism in children: a systematic review of the literature. J Oral Rehabil, 40:631-642, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12069
  13. Dawood A, Marti BM, Sauret-Jackson V, Darwood A : 3D printing in dentistry. Br Dent J, 219:521-529, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.914
  14. Anadioti E, Kane B, Soulas E : Current and emerging applications of 3D printing in restorative dentistry. Curr Oral Health Rep, 5:133-139, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40496-018-0181-3
  15. Schweiger J, Edelhoff D, Guth JF : 3D printing in digital prosthetic dentistry: an overview of recent developments in additive manufacturing. J Clin Med, 10: 2010, 2021.
  16. Gatti AM : Biocompatibility of micro- and nano-particles in the colon. Part II. Biomaterials, 25:385-392, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(03)00537-4
  17. Gatti AM, Rivasi F : Biocompatibility of micro- and nanoparticles. Part I: in liver and kidney. Biomaterials, 23:2381-2387, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(01)00374-X
  18. Heintze SD : How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods. Dent Mater, 22:712-734, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2006.02.002
  19. Kist S, Stawarczyk B, Kollmuss M, Hickel R, Huth KC : Fracture load and chewing simulation of zirconia and stainless-steel crowns for primary molars. Eur J Oral Sci, 127:369-375, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1111/eos.12645
  20. Kim CM, Kim SR, Kim JH, Kim HY, Kim WC : Trueness of milled prostheses according to number of ball-end mill burs. J Prosthet Dent, 115:624-629, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2015.10.014
  21. Schaefer O, Watts DC, Sigusch BW, Kuepper H, Guentsch A : Marginal and internal fit of pressed lithium disilicate partial crowns in vitro: A three-dimensional analysis of accuracy and reproducibility. Dent Mater, 28:320-326, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2011.12.008
  22. Koletsi D, Iliadi A, Eliades T, Eliades G : In Vitro Simulation and In Vivo Assessment of Tooth Wear: A Meta-Analysis of In Vitro and Clinical Research. Materials, 12:3575, 2019.
  23. Mohn M, Frankenberger R, Kramer N : Wear and marginal quality of aesthetic crowns for primary molars. Int J Pediatr Dent, 32:273-283, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.12852
  24. Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G : Quantitative in vivo wear of human enamel. J Dent Res, 68:1752-1754, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345890680120601
  25. Heintze SD, Zappini G, Rousson V : Wear of ten dental restorative materials in five wear simulators - results of a round robin test. Dent Mater, 21:304-317, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dental.2004.05.003
  26. da Cunha MR, Puppin-Rontani RM, Ferracane JL, Correr-Sobrinho L : In vitro wear evaluation of dental materials in primary teeth. Am J Dent, 19:364-369, 2006.
  27. Wassell RW, McCabe JF, Walls AW : Wear characteristics in a two-body wear test. Dent Mater, 10:269-274, 1994. https://doi.org/10.1016/0109-5641(94)90073-6
  28. Park JM, Ahn JS, Cha HS, Lee JH : Wear resistance of 3D printing resin material opposing zirconia and metal antagonists. Materials, 11:1043, 2018.
  29. Sripetchdanond J, Leevailoj C : Wear of human enamel opposing monolithic zirconia, glass ceramic, and composite resin: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent, 112:1141-1150, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.05.006
  30. Sorensen JA : A rationale for comparison of plaque-retaining properties of crown systems. J Prosthet Dent, 62:264-269, 1989. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3913(89)90329-6
  31. Bhamra G, Palin WM, Fleming GJ : The effect of surface roughness on the flexure strength of an alumina reinforced all-ceramic crown material. J Dent, 30:153-160, 2002. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00012-X