DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Developing a pediatric nursing simulation scenario template in South Korea: applying real-time Delphi methods

  • Eun Joo Kim (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Meen Hye Lee (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Bitna Park (Department of Nursing, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.03.19
  • 심사 : 2024.04.21
  • 발행 : 2024.04.30

초록

Purpose: This study aimed to describe the process of developing a validated pediatric nursing simulation scenario template using the real-time Delphi method. Methods: A panel of 13 pediatric nursing experts participated in a real-time Delphi survey conducted over two rounds. Initially, 83 items were included in the questionnaire focusing on the structure and content of the simulation scenario template. Data analysis involved calculating the content validity ratio (CVR) and the coefficient of variation to assess item validity and stability. Results: Through iterative rounds of the Delphi survey, a consensus was reached among the experts, resulting in the development of a pediatric nursing simulation scenario template comprising 41 items across nine parts. The CVR values ranged from 0.85 to 1.0, indicating a high consensus among experts regarding the inclusion of all items in the template. Conclusion: This study presents a novel approach for developing a pediatric nursing simulation scenario template using real-time Delphi methods. The real-time Delphi method facilitated the development of a comprehensive and scientifically grounded pediatric nursing simulation scenario template. Our template aligns with the International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning standards, and provides valuable guidance for educators in designing effective simulation scenarios, contributing to enhanced learning outcomes and better preparation for pediatric clinical practice. However, consideration of cultural and contextual adaptations is necessary, and further research should explore alternative consensus criteria.

키워드

과제정보

This study was supported by a National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korean government (No. 2021R1A2C1095530).

참고문헌

  1. Fletcher JL. AANA Journal course: update for nurse anesthetists--ERR WATCH: anesthesia crisis resource management from the nurse anesthetist's perspective. AANA Journal. 1998;66(6):595-602.
  2. Shin S, Park JH, Kim JH. Effectiveness of patient simulation in nursing education: meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today. 2015;35(1):176-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.09.009
  3. Gaba DM. A brief history of mannequin-based simulation & application. In: Dunn WF, Editor. Simulators in critical care education and beyond. Society of Critical Care Medicine; 2004. p. 7-14.
  4. Jeffries PR, Rodgers B, Adamson K. NLN Jeffries simulation theory: brief narrative description. Nursing Education Perspectives. 2015;36(5):292-293. https://doi.org/10.5480/1536-5026-36.5.292
  5. Korean Statistical Information Service. Birth rate statistics [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 April 14]. Available from: https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301010000&bid=204&list_no=426806&act=view&mainXml=Y
  6. Lee H, Jeon H. Experience in child health nursing practice using virtual simulation in the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Korea Society for Simulation in Nursing. 2022;10(1):73-87. https://doi.org/10.17333/JKSSN.2022.10.1.73
  7. Diaz-Guio DA, Rios-Barrientos E, Santillan-Roldan PA, Mora-Martinez S, Diaz-Gomez AS, Martinez-Elizondo JA, et al. Online-synchronized clinical simulation: an efficient teaching-learning option for the COVID-19 pandemic time and: beyond. Advances in Simulation. 2021;6(1):30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41077-021-00183-z
  8. Cooper JB, Taqueti VR. A brief history of the development of mannequin simulators for clinical education and training. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 2008;84(997):563-570. https://doi.org/10.1136/qshc.2004.009886
  9. Kim E, Song S, Kim S. Development of pediatric simulation-based education - a systematic review. BMC Nursing. 2023;22(1):291. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-023-01458-8
  10. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: educational issues and practical implications. Medical Education. 2003;37(3):267-277. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01440.x
  11. Jeffries PR. Simulation in nursing education: from conceptualization to evaluation. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Natinal League for Nursing; 2012. p. 25-42.
  12. INACSL Standards Committee. INACSL standards of best practice: SimulationSM simulation design. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2016;12(Suppl):S5-S12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.09.005
  13. Shim K, Shin H. The reliability and validity of the lasater clinical judgement rubric in Korean nursing students. Child Health Nursing Research. 2015;21(2):160-167. https://doi.org/10.4094/chnr.2015.21.2.160
  14. Mirza N, Cinel J, Noyes H, McKenzie W, Burgess K, Blackstock S, et al. Simulated patient scenario development: a methodological review of validity and reliability reporting. Nurse Education Today. 2020;85:104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104222
  15. Kim EJ, Cho KM, Song SS. Child nursing simulation scenario content analysis: a directed qualitative content analysis. Clinical Simulation in Nursing. 2024;87:101488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2023.101488
  16. Gordon TJ. The real-time Delphi method. Futures research methodology - version 3.0 [Internet]. 2009 [cited 2024 January 31]. Available from: https://millennium-project.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/05-Real-Time-Delphi.pdf
  17. Aengenheyster S, Cuhls K, Gerhold L, Heiskanen-Schuttler M, Huck J, Muszynska M. Real-time Delphi in practice - a comparative analysis of existing software-based tools. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2017;118:15-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.01.023
  18. Junger S, Payne SA, Brine J, Radbruch L, Brearley SG. Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES) in palliative care: recommendations based on a methodological systematic review. Palliative Medicine. 2017;31(8):684-706. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216317690685
  19. International Nursing Association for Clinical Simulation and Learning (INACSL). Healthcare Simulation Standards of Best PracticeTM [Internet]. 2023 [cited 2024 April 15]. Available from: https://www.inacsl.org/healthcare-simulation-standards-ql
  20. Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Personnel Psychology. 1975;28(4):563-575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  21. Ju QY, Huang LH, Zhao XH, Xing MY, Shao LW, Zhang MY, et al. Development of evidence-based nursing-sensitive quality indicators for emergency nursing: a Delphi study. Journal of Clinical Nursing. 2018;27(15-16):3008-3019. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.14256
  22. Ambrose LJ, Ker JS. Levels of reflective thinking and patient safety: an investigation of the mechanisms that impact on student learning in a single cohort over a 5 year curriculum. Advances in Health Sciences Education. 2014;19(3):297-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-013-9470-8
  23. Pai HC, Ko HL, Eng CJ, Yen WJ. The mediating effect of self-reflection and learning effectiveness on clinical nursing performance in nursing students: a follow-up study. Journal of Professional Nursing. 2017;33(4):287-292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.profnurs.2017.01.003
  24. Colomer J, Pallisera M, Fullana J, Burriel MP, Fernandez R. Reflective learning in higher education: a comparative analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2013;93:364-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.204
  25. Varndell W, Fry M, Elliott D. Applying real-time Delphi methods: development of a pain management survey in emergency nursing. BMC Nursing. 2021;20(1):149. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00661-9
  26. Wilkes L, Mohan S, Luck L, Jackson D. Development of a violence tool in the emergency hospital setting. Nurse Researcher. 2010;17(4):70-82. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2010.07.17.4.70.c7926
  27. Fry M, Burr G. Using the Delphi technique to design a self-reporting triage survey tool. Accident and Emergency Nursing. 2001;9(4):235-241. https://doi.org/10.1054/aaen.2001.0245