DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Canine Tarsus

  • Soomin Park (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Sang-hwa Ryu (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jae-gwan Heo (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Eun-jee Kim (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Jihye Choi (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University) ;
  • Junghee Yoon (College of Veterinary Medicine and the Research Institute for Veterinary Science, Seoul National University)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.22
  • 심사 : 2024.03.15
  • 발행 : 2024.04.30

초록

The tarsus in dogs has a complex structure that makes its evaluation relatively challenging. Because an accurate diagnosis of the tarsus is difficult through basic examinations alone, imaging tests are essential. Previous studies have explored the anatomical and radiological features of the canine tarsus using several imaging modalities. However, the imaging utility of the tarsus across different modalities has not been thoroughly evaluated. This study aimed to visualize the tarsal structures using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasonography, compare their utility, and propose suitable imaging modalities and conditions for evaluating specific tarsal structures. Magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound scans of the tarsus of four healthy dogs were performed, and two observers rated the utility of each image on a five-point scale. Although MRI is more beneficial for assessing the tarsal structures than ultrasound, ultrasound also appears clinically useful for evaluating the cranial tibialis muscle, deep digital flexor tendon, subcutaneous fat, joint space, and superficial digital flexor tendon. In addition, each structure of interest can be evaluated for optimal visibility using specific ultrasound sections, MRI sequences, and planes. In veterinary clinical practice, an initial assessment using ultrasound imaging with optimal visibility is required and if further evaluation is necessary, MRI examinations with optimal MRI sequences and planes can be performed.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Abako J, Holak P, Glodek J, Zhalniarovich Y. Usefulness of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of selected injuries and lesions of the canine tarsus. A review. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11: 1834. 
  2. Butler D, Nemanic S, Warnock JJ. Comparison of radiography and computed tomography to evaluate fractures of the canine tarsus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2018; 59: 43-53.  https://doi.org/10.1111/vru.12558
  3. Caine A, Agthe P, Posch B, Herrtage M. Sonography of the soft tissue structures of the canine tarsus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2009; 50: 304-308.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2009.01539.x
  4. Carlisle CH, Reynolds KM. Radiographic anatomy of the tarsocrural joint of the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1990; 31: 273-279.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1990.tb00806.x
  5. Craig LE, Julian ME, Ferracone JD. The diagnosis and prognosis of synovial tumors in dogs: 35 cases. Vet Pathol 2002; 39: 66-73.  https://doi.org/10.1354/vp.39-1-66
  6. Daoualibi Y, Pohl CB, Kemper RT, Rolemberg KM, Demeulemeester SC, Bandinelli MB, et al. Tarsal villonodular tenosynovitis (giant cell tumor of tendon sheath) in a dog. Cienc Rural 2021; 51: e20200786. 
  7. Deruddere KJ, Milne ME, Wilson KM, Snelling SR. Magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and gross anatomy of the canine tarsus. Vet Surg 2014; 43: 912-919.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-950X.2014.12194.x
  8. Dik KJ. Ultrasonography of the equine tarsus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1993; 34: 36-43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1993.tb01991.x
  9. Dorfman SK, Hurvitz AI, Patnaik AK. Primary and secondary bone tumours in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1977; 18: 313-326.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1977.tb05890.x
  10. Fitch RB, Wilson ER, Hathcock JT, Montgomery RD. Radiographic, computed tomographic and magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of a chronic long digital extensor tendon avulsion in a dog. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1997; 38: 177-181.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1997.tb00836.x
  11. Gielen IM, De Rycke LM, van Bree HJ, Simoens PJ. Computed tomography of the tarsal joint in clinically normal dogs. Am J Vet Res 2001; 62: 1911-1915.  https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2001.62.1911
  12. Harasen G. Arthrodesis--Part II: the tarsus. Can Vet J 2002; 43: 806-808. 
  13. Hodgson RJ, O'Connor PJ, Grainger AJ. Tendon and ligament imaging. Br J Radiol 2012; 85: 1157-1172.  https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/34786470
  14. Koo Y, Yun T, Chae Y, Lee D, Kim H, Yang MP, et al. Cutaneous angiomatosis in a dog: a case report. Korean J Vet Res 2021; 61: e28. 
  15. Lamb CR, Duvernois A. Ultrasonographic anatomy of the normal canine calcaneal tendon. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2005; 46: 326-330.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2005.00061.x
  16. Levine BD, Motamedi K, Seeger LL. Imaging of the shoulder: a comparison of MRI and ultrasound. Curr Sports Med Rep 2012; 11: 239-243.  https://doi.org/10.1249/JSR.0b013e31826b6baa
  17. Lin M, Glass EN, Kent M. Utility of MRI for evaluation of a common calcaneal tendon rupture in a dog: case report. Front Vet Sci 2020; 7: 602. 
  18. Liuti T, Saunders JH, Gielen I, De Rycke L, Coopman F, van Bree H. Ultrasound approach to the canine distal tibia and trochlear ridges of the talus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007; 48: 361-367.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2007.00257.x
  19. Maher MA, Emam IA. Normal vascular and nerve distribution of the pes region in dogs: an anatomical and diagnostic imaging. Int J Vet Sci 2020; 9: 259-266. 
  20. Morgan JP, Wind A, Davidson AP. Bone dysplasias in the labrador retriever: a radiographic study. J Am Anim Hosp Assoc 1999; 35: 332-340.  https://doi.org/10.5326/15473317-35-4-332
  21. Nordberg CC, Johnson KA. Magnetic resonance imaging of normal canine carpal ligaments. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 1999; 40: 128-136.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.1999.tb01897.x
  22. Perinetti G. StaTips Part IV: selection, interpretation and reporting of the intraclass correlation coefficient. South Eur J Orthod Dentofac Res 2018; 5: 3-5.  https://doi.org/10.5937/sejodr5-17434
  23. Roch SP, Clements DN, Mitchell RA, Downes C, Gemmill TJ, Macias C, et al. Complications following tarsal arthrodesis using bone plate fixation in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 2008; 49: 117-126.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.2007.00468.x
  24. Rosenblum GP, Robins GM, Carlisle CH. Osteochondritis dissecans of the tibio-tarsal joint in the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1978; 19: 759-767.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1978.tb05570.x
  25. Sabiza S, Khajeh A, Naddaf H. Reconstruction of long digital extensor tendon by cranial tibial muscle fascia graft in a dog. Vet Res Forum 2016; 7: 271-274. 
  26. Sjostrom L, Hakanson N. Traumatic injuries associated with the short lateral collateral ligaments of the talocrural joint of the dog. J Small Anim Pract 1994; 35: 163-168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-5827.1994.tb03923.x
  27. Stahl C, Wacker C, Weber U, Forterre F, Hecht P, Lang J, et al. MRI features of gastrocnemius musculotendinopathy in herding dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2010; 51: 380-385.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01677.x
  28. Sullivan CV, Zuckerman J, Popovitch C. Caudal thigh intermuscular lipomas in dogs: anatomic review and approach to surgical excision. Can Vet J 2021; 62: 1219-1224. 
  29. Vaughan LC. Disorders of the tarsus in the dog. I. Br Vet J 1987; 143: 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1935(87)90016-9