DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

비보강 조적조 건축물의 외부 보강에 따른 내진성능 연구

A Study on Seismic Performance of External Reinforcement for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

  • 김종연 (가민(주)) ;
  • 강종 ((주)상지엔지니어링 건축사사무소 부설 연구소)
  • 투고 : 2024.02.05
  • 심사 : 2024.03.05
  • 발행 : 2024.04.30

초록

내진설계 되지 아니한 조적조 건축물의 내진성능을 평가하고 건축물의 외부에 내진 보강 공법을 채택하여 내진성능을 향상시키고자 하였다. 내진성능을 평가하기 위해 건축물 내진설계 기준 및 해설(KDS 41 17 00 : 2019)과 기존 시설물(건축물) 내진성능 평가요령을 적용하였으며 비선형 정적해석으로 pushover해석을 수행하였다. 해석결과, 우리나라 주택의 내진설계 보급 비율이 낮고 주택의 많은 비중을 차지하고 있는 것이 조적조 건축물임을 고려하면 내진보강이 시급한 것으로 판단되었다. 조적조 건축물에 철골 보-기등+가새 프레임을 보강할 경우 층간 변형각은 X방향 0.043%이며 Y방향 0.047%로 나타나 규정을 만족하였다. 성능 수준별 중력하중 저항능력은 X, Y방향 모두 거주가능으로 판정되어 안전한 것으로 판단되었다. 건축물의 외부에 보강함으로써 주택의 거주성과 편의성을 확보하면서 공사가 가능할 것으로 보여지며 지진성능과 구조물의 거동을 보다 명확하게 예측할 수 있을 것으로 사료 되었다.

In this study, we evaluated the seismic performance of a masonry building that was not designed to be earthquake-resistant and attempted to improve the seismic performance by adopting a seismic reinforcement method on the exterior of the building. In addition, the building seismic design standards and commentary(KDS 41 17 00:2019) and existing facility(building) seismic performance evaluation methods were applied to evaluate seismic performance, and a pushover analysis was performed using non-linear static analysis. As the result of this study, it was determined that seismic reinforcement was urgent because the distribution rate of earthquake-resistant design of houses in Korea was low and masonry structures accounted for a large proportion of houses. When reinforcing the steel beam-column+brace frame in a masonry building, the story drift angle was 0.043% in the X direction and 0.047% in the Y direction, indicating that it satisfied the regulations. The gravity load resistance capacity by performance level was judged to be a safe building because it was habitable in both X and Y directions. In conclusion, it is believed that the livability and convenience of the house can be secured by reinforcing the exterior of the building and the seismic performance and behavior of the structure can be clearly predicted.

키워드

과제정보

이 연구는 (주)상지엔지니어링 건축사사무소의 연구지원으로 수행되었으며 이에 감사드립니다.

참고문헌

  1. Architectural Institute of Korea. (2019), Seismic Building Design Code and Commentary(Korea Building Code, KDS 41 17 00:2019), 23-112.
  2. KALIS (2021), Guidelines for Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings, Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety, JinJu, 1-138.
  3. KALIS (2022), Guidelines for Seismic Retrofit of Existing Buildings, Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety, JinJu, 9-70.
  4. Cho, S. M., Choi, S. M., Kwon, K. H., and Lee, S. C. (2004), An Experimental Study on Seismic Capacity Improvement of Masonry Buildings by Glass Fiber Reinforced Methods, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation , 4(2), 47-52 (in Korean).
  5. Kim, T. W., Min, C. G., and Lee, H. M.(2011), Seismic Performance Evaluation of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings by using a Three-Step Procedure, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation , 4(2), 47-52 (in Korean).
  6. Kwon, K. H., Min, M. H., and Kim, H. J. (2013), Seismic Performance Assessment of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings using Incremental Dynamic Analysis, Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection, 17(3), 28-39 (in Korean). https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2013.17.3.028
  7. Seol,Y. J., and Park, J. H. (2020), Seismic Performance Evaluation of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings Retrofitted by Strengthening External Walls, Journal of the Korean Society of Hazard Mitigation , 24(2), 77-86 (in Korean).
  8. KALIS (2011), Guidelines for Seismic Performance of Existing Buildings, Korea Authority of Land & Infrastructure Safety, JinJu, 111-115.