DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The fundamental frequency (f0) distribution of American speakers in a spontaneous speech corpus

  • Byunggon Yang (Department of English Education, Pusan National University)
  • Received : 2024.01.30
  • Accepted : 2024.03.08
  • Published : 2024.03.31

Abstract

The fundamental frequency (f0), representing an acoustic measure of vocal fold vibration, serves as an indicator of the speaker's emotional state and language-specific pattern in daily conversations. This study aimed to examine the f0 distribution in an English corpus of spontaneous speech, establishing normative data for American speakers. The corpus involved 40 participants engaging in free discussions on daily activities and personal viewpoints. Using Praat, f0 values were collected filtering outliers after removing nonspeech sounds and interviewer voices. Statistical analyses were performed with R. Results indicated a median f0 value of 145 Hz for all the speakers. The f0 values for all speakers exhibited a right-skewed, pointy distribution within a frequency range of 216 Hz from 75 Hz to 339 Hz. The female f0 range was wider than that of males, with a median of 113 Hz for males and 181 Hz for females. This spontaneous speech corpus provides valuable insights for linguists into f0 variation among individuals or groups in a language. Further research is encouraged to develop analytical and statistical measures for establishing reliable f0 standards for the general population.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a Humanities·Social-Science Research Promotion of Pusan National University (2022).

References

  1. Baken, R. J. (2005). The aged voice: A new hypothesis. Journal of Voice, 19(3), 317-325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.07.005
  2. Boersma, P., & Weenink, D. (2023). Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (Version 6.3.14) [Computer Program]. Retrieved from http://www.fon.hum.uva.nl/praat/
  3. Boothroyd, A. (1986). Speech acoustics and perception. Austin, TX: Pro-ED.
  4. Fant, G. (1973). Speech sounds and features. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  5. Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. London, UK: Sage Publications.
  6. Hollien, H., & Shipp, T. (1972). Speaking fundamental frequency and chronologic age in males. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15(1), 155-159.
  7. Hudson, T., de Jong, G., McDougall, K., Harrison, P., & Nolan, F. (2007, August). F0 statistics for 100 young male speakers of Standard Southern British English. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Saarbrucken, Germany.
  8. Lennes, M., Stevanovic, M., Aalto, D., & Palo, P. (2016). Comparing pitch distributions using Praat and R. Phonetician, 111(2), 35-53.
  9. Lindh, J. (2006). Preliminary descriptive f0-statistics for young male speakers. In G. Ambrazaitis, & S. Schotz (Eds.), Working papers 52: Papers from Fonetik 2006 (pp. 89-92). Lund, Sweden: Department of Linguistics, Lund University.
  10. Mennen, I., Schaeffler, F., & Dickie, C. (2014). Second language acquisition of pitch range in German learners of English. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 36(2), 303-329.
  11. Ordin, M., & Mennen, I. (2017). Cross-linguistic differences in bilinguals' fundamental frequency ranges. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 60(6), 1493-1506.
  12. Pitt, M., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E., & Fosler-Lussier, E. (2007). Buckeye corpus of conversational speech (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
  13. R Core Team. (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing (version 4.3.1) [Computer software]. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/
  14. Reubold, U., Harrington, J., & Kleber, F. (2010). Vocal aging effects on F0 and the first formant: A longitudinal analysis in adult speakers. Speech Communication, 52(7-8), 638-651.
  15. Scharff-Rethfeldt, W., Miller, N., & Mennen, I. (2008). Unterschiede in der mittleren Sprechtonhohe bei Deutsch/Englisch bilingualen Sprechern. Sprache, Stimme, Gehor, 32(3), 123-128.
  16. Yang, B. (1990). Development of vowel normalization procedures: English and Korean (Doctoral dissertation). The University of Texas, Austin, TX.
  17. Yang, B. (2021). The f0 distribution of Korean speakers in a spontaneous speech corpus. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 13(3), 31-37. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2021.13.3.031
  18. Yang, B. (2023). The fundamental frequency (f0) distribution of Korean speakers in a dialogue corpus using Praat and R. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 15(3), 17-25. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2023.15.3.017
  19. Yun, W., Yoon, K., Park, S., Lee, J., Cho, S., Kang, D., Byun, K., ... Kim, J. (2015). The Korean corpus of spontaneous speech. Phonetics and Speech Sciences, 7(2), 103-109. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2015.7.2.103
  20. Zimmerer, F., Jugler, J., Andreeva, B., Mobius, B., & Trouvain, J. (2014, May). Too cautious to vary more? A comparison of pitch variation in native and non-native productions of French and German speakers. Proceedings of Speech Prosody. Dublin, Ireland.