DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Jigsaw class participation experience

  • Jungae Kim (Department of Nursing, Chodang University)
  • 투고 : 2024.01.30
  • 심사 : 2024.03.10
  • 발행 : 2024.03.31

초록

This study was conducted to understand the essential structure and meaning of the experience of participating in the Jigsaw class designed to achieve the learning goals for nursing students with different basic learning abilities, and to prepare a plan for each individual to learn as a collaborator rather than a competition with each other. As a study based on Giorgi's phenomenological research method and in-depth interviews, data collection was collected from 10 study participants from December 1, 2023 to December 20, 2023. The main question used in the interview was "What impressed you after participating in Jigsaw teaching meathod?" The transcribed data were analyzed through the stages of overall recognition, classification of semantic units, transformation of semantic units into psychological expressions, and integration into general structures according to Giorgi's qualitative analysis method. As a result, a total of 89 semantic units, 35 essential psychological meanings, 13 sub-components, and 6 components were derived. The six components include 'good communication', 'difference appear in material preparation', 'easy to understand', 'finding team members who form a learning atmosphere well', 'A talkative class', and 'Unprepared team members are uncomfortable'. Based on the above results, it is expected that students in a passive position in class will become teachers themselves, take responsibility for preparing for learning, and provide useful basic data for developing programs that cooperate among students.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. MG Jeong, YJ Yang, A Study on the Perception and Demand of Teaching-Learning Participants to Support Basic Learning Ability of University Students and Educational Culture Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 101~126, 2016.
  2. A. Giorgi, "The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: A modified Husserlian approach," Duquesne University Press, Pittsburgh, PA. 2009.
  3. E. Husserl, "The Essential Husserl: Basic Writings in Transcendental Phenomenology," Indiana: Indiana University Press, pp. 60-79, 1999.
  4. Nuran, T., Student support as a factor affecting the quality of australiandistance education: The findings of the project to investigate quality andstandards in distance education. Paper presented for the workshop,"Student support in distance education and open learning: Maintainingquality in a changing environment" (Victoria, Australia, November 17, 1992.
  5. Slavin, R. E., Cooperative Learning in Student Team: What Research Says to the Teacher, Washington D.C: National Education Association, 1987.
  6. Aronson, E., The Jigsaw Classroom , Beverly Hills: Sage, 1978.
  7. M. Sandelowski, "The Problem of Rigor in Qualitative Research," Advances in Nursing Science, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 27-37, 1986. https://doi.org/10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005
  8. HY Kim, HY Tak, The longitudial relationship among teaching methods, subject interest, and academic achievement in middle school mathematics, The Journal of deucation, Vol. 42, No. 4, pp. 61-76, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25020/je.2022.42.4.61.
  9. GY Kim, JS Park, The relationship between teacher adminictration and class preparation from the perpective of educational sociology: Discrimination causal relationships and modulating effects by public and private types, Academic journal, Vol. 2013, No.-, pp. 1-23, 2013.
  10. JH Eun, JS Choi, The moderating effects of school environment between motivation and academic attidudes in high schools: Focusing on satisfaction level of learning facilities, teacher professionalism and class atmosphere, Journal of education and culture, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 621-643, 2020.