DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Pain perception in 4-6-year-old children following intraoral dental injection with 26 and 31-gauge needles: a randomized controlled trial

  • Sneharaj N (Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, The Oxford Dental College) ;
  • Akhilesh Sharma (Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, The Oxford Dental College) ;
  • Madhusudhan Kempaiah Siddaiah (Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, The Oxford Dental College) ;
  • Priya Subramaniam (Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, The Oxford Dental College)
  • 투고 : 2023.12.31
  • 심사 : 2024.01.25
  • 발행 : 2024.04.01

초록

Background: Administering anesthesia in dentistry can be distressing for patients, especially those with dental fear and anxiety. Needle pain during local anesthesia is a common concern in intraoral procedures. This study aimed to compare pain perception in 4-6-year-old children following intraoral dental injections with 26- and 31-gauge needles. Methods: Fifty healthy children were divided according to age into Group I (N = 25; 4-5 years) and Group II (N = 25; 5-6 years). Each group was further subdivided according to the needle gauge as follows: Group IA (26 gauge), Group IB (31 gauge), Group IIA (26 gauge), and Group IIB (31 gauge). Using a lottery method, the gauge of the needle to be used at the first visit for local anesthesia administration was selected. Children's reactions to pain were evaluated using a Modified Behavioral Pain Scale. Immediately after administration of local anesthesia, pain perception was evaluated using the Faces pain rating scale. In the subsequent visit, another needle gauge was used to administer local anesthesia, and the previously described evaluations were performed. At the third appointment, the child was shown both syringes and asked to choose one of the syringes they preferred, and the choice was noted. Results: When local anesthesia was administered using a 31-gauge needle, pain perception was similar between the two groups. In group II, the children demonstrated significantly higher arm and leg movements (P = 0.001). However, the difference was significant in group I alone (P < 0.001). Conclusion: Irrespective of age, anesthesia with a 31-gauge needle resulted in significantly lower pain perception than anesthesia with a 26-gauge needle.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Makade CS, Shenoi PR, Gunwal MK. Comparison of acceptance, preference and efficacy between pressure anesthesia and classical needle infiltration anesthesia for dental restorative procedures in adult patients. J Conserv Dent 2014; 17: 169-74.  https://doi.org/10.4103/0972-0707.128063
  2. Kohli K, Ngan P, Crout R, Linscott CC. A survey of local and topical anesthesia use by pediatric dentists in the United States. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23: 265-9. 
  3. Shinohara S, Nomura Y, Shingyouchi K, Takase A, Ide M, Moriyasu K et al. Structural relationship of child behavior and its evaluation during dental treatment. J Oral Sci 2005; 47: 91-6.  https://doi.org/10.2334/josnusd.47.91
  4. Ghasemi D, Rajaei S, Aghasizadeh E. Comparison of inferior dental nerve block injections in child patients using 30-gauge and 27-gauge short needles. J Dent Mater Tech 2014; 3: 71-6. 
  5. Taddio A, Nulman I, Koren BS, Stevens B, Koren G. A revised measure of acute pain in infants. J Pain Symptom Manage 1995; 10: 456-63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0885-3924(95)00058-7
  6. Chandran R. Pain assessment in children using a modified wong baker faces pain rating scale. Int J Clin Prev Dent 2019; 15: 202-5.  https://doi.org/10.15236/ijcpd.2019.15.4.202
  7. Chavhan P, Jawdekar A, Deshpande S, Chandak S, Niswade G, Bhondey A. Comparison of pain perception during the administration of local anaesthesia with computerized delivery system (WAND) and conventional technique in pediatric dental procedure using Visual Analogue scale-a randomised controlled trial. Clin Epidemiol Glob Health 2020; 8: 224-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2019.08.003
  8. Malamed SF. Handbook of local anesthesia. 7th ed. St. Louis, Elsevier. 2020, pp 123-5. 
  9. Ram D, Hermida B L, Amir E. Reaction of children to dental injection with 27-or 30-gauge needles. Int J Paediatr Dent 2007; 17: 383-7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-263X.2007.00860.x
  10. Asokan A, Rao AP, Mohan G, Reddy NV, Kumar K. A pain perception comparison of intraoral dental anesthesia with 26 and 30 gauge needles in 6-12-year-old children. J Pediatr Dent 2014; 2: 56-60.  https://doi.org/10.4103/2321-6646.137690
  11. Lehtinen R. Penetration of 27- and 30-gauge dental needles. Int J Oral Surg 1983; 12: 444-5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(83)80036-2
  12. Lehtinen R, Oksala E. Penetration of disposable needles. Int J Oral Surg 1979; 8: 145-8.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300-9785(79)80010-1
  13. Fuller NP, Menke RA, Meyers WJ. Perception of pain to three different intra oral penetrations of needles. J Am Dent Assoc 1979; 99: 822-4.  https://doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1979.0384
  14. Mollen AJ, Ficara AJ, Provant DR. Needles--25 gauge versus 27 gauge--can patients really tell? Gen Dent 1981; 29: 417-8. 
  15. Flanagan T, Wahl MJ, Schmitt MM, Wahl JA. Size doesn't matter: needle gauge and injection pain. Gen Dent 2007; 55: 216-7. 
  16. Brownbill JW, Walker PO, Bourcy BD, Keenan KM. Comparison of inferior dental nerve block injections in child patients using 30-gauge and 25-gauge short needles. Anesth Prog 1987; 34: 215-9. 
  17. Meechan JG, Howlett PC, Smith BD. Factors influencing the discomfort of intraoral needle penetration. Anesth Prog 2005; 52: 91-4.  https://doi.org/10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[91:FITDOI]2.0.CO;2
  18. Abdelmoniem SA, Mahmoud SA. Comparative evaluation of passive, active, and passive-active distraction techniques on pain perception during local anesthesia administration in children. J Adv Res 2016; 7: 551-6.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jare.2015.10.001
  19. Kohli N, Hugar SM, Patil VH, Saxena N, Kadam KS, Karmarkar S. Evaluating anxiety levels and pain perception while administering local anesthesia using conventional, insulin, and deception syringes in 6-12-year-olds. J Dent Anesth Pain Med 2022; 22: 197-204. https://doi.org/10.17245/jdapm.2022.22.3.197