Women's Health Nursing (여성건강간호학회지)

Korean Society of Women Health Nursing (한국여성건강간호학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Discrete choice experiment for dyadic data collection: eliciting preferences of couple-based smoking cessation interventions

  • Received : 2024.01.15
  • Accepted : 2024.03.08
  • Published : 2024.03.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This study was supported by funding from the STTI Rho Chapter and Wayne State University College of Nursing.

References

  1. Phillips KA, Johnson FR, Maddala T. Measuring what people value: a comparison of "attitude" and "preference" surveys. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(6):1659-1679. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.01116 
  2. Soekhai V, de Bekker-Grob EW, Ellis AR, Vass CM. Discrete choice experiments in health economics: past, present and future. pharmacoeconomics. 2019;37(2):201-226. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0734-2 
  3. Regmi K, Kaphle D, Timilsina S, Tuha NA. Application of discrete-choice experiment methods in tobacco control: a systematic review. Pharmacoecon Open. 2018;2(1):5-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-017-0025-4
  4. Katz DA, Hamlin C, Vander Weg MW, Grant KM, Stewart Steffensmeier KR, Paez M, et al. Veterans' preferences for tobacco treatment in primary care: a discrete choice experiment. Patient Educ Couns. 2020;103(3):652-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2019.10.002 
  5. Salloum RG, Abbyad CW, Kohler RE, Kratka AK, Oh L, Wood KA. Assessing preferences for a university-based smoking cessation program in Lebanon: a discrete choice experiment. Nicotine Tob Res. 2015;17(5):580-585. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntu188 
  6. Pesko MF, Kenkel DS, Wang H, Hughes JM. The effect of potential electronic nicotine delivery system regulations on nicotine product selection. Addiction. 2016;111(4):734-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13257 
  7. Scholz U, Stadler G, Ochsner S, Rackow P, Hornung R, Knoll N. Examining the relationship between daily changes in support and smoking around a self-set quit date. Health Psychol. 2016;35(5):514-517. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000286 
  8. Luscher J, Stadler G, Scholz U. A daily diary study of joint quit attempts by dual-smoker couples: the role of received and provided social support. Nicotine Tob Res. 2017;20(1):100-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntx079 
  9. Powers MB, Vedel E, Emmelkamp PM. Behavioral couples therapy (BCT) for alcohol and drug use disorders: a meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2008;28(6):952-962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2008.02.002 
  10. Porter LS, Gao X, Lyna P, Kraus W, Olsen M, Patterson E, et al. Pilot randomized trial of a couple-based physical activity videoconference intervention for sedentary cancer survivors. Health Psychol. 2018;37(9):861-865. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000608 
  11. Westmaas JL, Bontemps-Jones J, Bauer JE. Social support in smoking cessation: reconciling theory and evidence. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12(7):695-707. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq077 
  12. Choi SH. A systematic review and narrative summary of couple-based smoking cessation interventions. J Soc Pers Relat. 2022;39(7):1901-1916. https://doi.org/10.1177/02654075211070272 
  13. Shoham V, Butler EA, Rohrbaugh MJ, Trost SE. Symptom-system fit in couples: emotion regulation when one or both partners smoke. J Abnorm Psychol. 2007;116(4):848-853. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.116.4.848 
  14. Rohrbaugh MJ, Shoham V, Skoyen JA, Jensen M, Mehl MR. We-talk, communal coping, and cessation success in a couple-focused intervention for health-compromised smokers. Fam Process. 2012;51(1):107-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2012.01388.x 
  15. Choi SH, Templin T, Marrocco A. Development of an online discrete choice experiment to elicit preferences for tobacco treatment among college students. J Am Coll Health. 2023 Jul 12 [Epub]. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2023.2227715 
  16. Faseru B, Richter KP, Scheuermann TS, Park EW. Enhancing partner support to improve smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD002928. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD002928.pub4 
  17. Cohen S, Lichtenstein E, Kingsolver K, Mermelstein R, Baer JS, Kamarck TW. Social support interventions for smoking cessation. In: Gottlieb BH, editors. Marshaling social support: formats, processes, and effects. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 1988. p. 211-240. 
  18. SAS Institute Inc. JMP® 14 design of experiments guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc; 2018. 
  19. Orme BK. Chapter 7. Sample size issues for conjoint analysis. In: Orme BK. Getting started with conjoint analysis: strategies for product design and pricing research. 4th ed. Madison, WI: Research Publishers LLC; 2019. 
  20. Veldwijk J, Determann D, Lambooij MS, van Til JA, Korfage IJ, de Bekker-Grob EW, et al. Exploring how individuals complete the choice tasks in a discrete choice experiment: an interview study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2016;16:45. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-016-0140-4