Journal of the Korean School Mathematics Society (한국학교수학회논문집)

The Korean School Mathematics Society (한국학교수학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The PICRAT model as a tool for analysis of mathematics classes using technology

테크놀로지 활용 수학 수업의 분석을 위한 도구로서의 PICRAT 모델

  • Received : 2024.02.18
  • Accepted : 2024.03.17
  • Published : 2024.03.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

As teaching and learning using technology has been emphasized, several models have been proposed to explain the integration of technology, and research on technology use has been actively conducted, especially focusing on TPACK. However, by focusing on only the teacher's knowledge, TPACK has limitations in analyzing how technology is used in actual classes and what experiences students have through technology. This study introduces the PICRAT model (Kimmons, Graham, & West (2020)), which focuses on 'students' relationship with technology' and 'teachers' teaching practices', as a lens for analyzing mathematics classes using technology. And by looking examples of analysis of mathematics class design through models, this study explored the applicability of the PICRAT model and its implications for mathematics education and teacher education.

테크놀로지를 활용한 교수·학습이 강조됨에 따라 테크놀로지의 통합을 설명하기 위한 여러 가지 모델이 제안되었으며, 특히 TPACK을 중심으로 테크놀로지 활용에 관한 연구가 활발히 진행되었다. 그러나 TPACK은 교사의 지식에만 초점을 두었기 때문에 실제 수업에서 테크놀로지가 어떤 양상으로 활용되고 있는지, 학생은 테크놀로지를 통해 어떤 경험을 하는지를 분석하는 데 한계를 가진다. 본 연구에서는 테크놀로지를 활용한 수학 수업을 분석하기 위한 렌즈로서, '학생과 테크놀로지와의 관계'와 '교사의 수업 관행'에 초점을 둔 PICRAT 모델(Kimmons, Graham, & West, 2020)을 소개하고, 모델을 통한 수학 수업 설계의 분석 사례를 살펴봄으로써 PICRAT 모델의 적용 가능성과 수학교육 및 교사 교육에의 시사점을 탐색하고자 하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kang, H., Ko, E., Kim, T., Cho, W., Lee, K., & Lee, D. (2011). Mathematics teachers' perspectives on competencies for good teaching and perspective teacher education. School Mathematics, 13(4), 633-649.
  2. Ministry of Education (2022). Mathematics curriculum (# 2022-33 supplement 8). Ministry of Education.
  3. Ministry of Education (2020.5.). Comprehensive plan for mathematics education. Ministry of Education Curriculum Policy Director.
  4. Kim, Y., Kwon, O., & Oh, H. (2014). Development of the classification criteria for technology teacher education. Korean Society Of Educational Technology, 30(1), 105-131.
  5. Byun, Y., & Kim, S. (2020). Analysis on self-study of high school mathematics teachers using technology. School Mathematics, 22(2), 373-394.
  6. Lee, D., & Whang, Woo. (2018). A study on TPACK of mathematics teachers : Focusing on recognitions and educational needs of TPACK. The Mathematical Education, 57(1), 1-36. https://doi.org/10.7468/MATHEDU.2018.57.1.1
  7. Rim, H. (2009). Study on the effectiveness of team project to improve TPACK of preservice mathematics teachers. The Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 19(4), 545-564.
  8. Rim, H., Jeon, Y., Lee, B., & Lee, J. (2023). Design statistics classes with CODAP. Seoul: Kyungmoon.
  9. Jang, K. (2017). Pre-service secondary mathematics teacher education program for technology integrated curriculum: The present and tasks. Journal of Educational Research in Mathematics, 27(1), 137-156.
  10. Asim, S., Ellis, J., Slykhuis, D., & Trumble, J. (2022). Three domains for technology integration in science teacher education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(4), 664-684.
  11. Cohen, D. K., Raudenbush, S. W., & Ball, D. L. (2003). Resources, instruction, and research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(2), 119-142.
  12. Florida Center for Instructional Technology (2019). The technology integration matrix. Retrieved February 17, 2024, from https://fcit.usf.edu/matrix/matrix/
  13. Geraniou, E., & Misfeldt, M. (2023). The mathematical competencies framework and digital technologies. In Mathematical competencies in the digital era (pp. 39-60). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  14. Geraniou, E., & Jankvist, U. T. (2019). Towards a definition of "mathematical digital competency". Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102(1), 29-45.
  15. Geraniou, E., Jankvist, U. T., Elicer, R., Tamborg, A. L., & Misfeldt, M. (2022). On mathematical digital competency for teaching: The case of an expert teacher. Mathematics Education in the Digital Age-MEDA3, 3, 161-168.
  16. Goyer, A. (2023). Supporting pre-service elementary teachers' early algebraic thinking with technology through lesson planning and TPACK. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nevada.
  17. Hamilton, E. R., Rosenberg, J. M., & Akcaoglu, M. (2016). The substitution augmentation modification redefinition (SAMR) model: A critical review and suggestions for its use. TechTrends, 60, 433-441.
  18. Heberer Jr, D. H. (2021). Teacher perceptions & practice of technology integration before and after PICRAT matrix professional development intervention. Doctoral dissertation, St. John's University.
  19. Higgins, E. L., & Raskind, M. H. (2004). The compensatory effectiveness of the Quicktionary Reading Pen II on the reading comprehension of students with learning disabilities. Journal of special education Technology, 20(1), 31-40.
  20. Hughes, J., Thomas, R., & Scharber, C. (2006). Assessing technology integration: The RAT-replacement, amplification, and transformation-framework. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference (pp. 1616-1620). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  21. Kimmons, R. (2018a). K-12 technology frameworks. RE West, foundations of learning and instructional design technology: The past, present, and future of learning and instructional design technology. EdTech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/lidtfoundations/k12_tech_frameworks
  22. Kimmons, R. (2018b). Technology integration: Effectively integrating technology in educational settings. In A. OttenbreitLeftwich, & R. Kimmons (Ed.), The K-12 educational technology handbook. Tech Books. https://edtechbooks.org/k12handbook/technology_integration
  23. Kimmons, R., Draper, D., & Backman, J. (2022). PICRAT: The PICRAT technology integration model. EdTechnica: The Open Encyclopedia of Educational Technology. https://dx.doi.org/10.59668/371.5895
  24. Kimmons, R., Graham, C. R., & West, R. E. (2020). The PICRAT model for technology integration in teacher preparation. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 20(1), 176-198.
  25. Koehler, M. (2012). What is TPACK? Retrieved February 17, 2024, from http://www.tpack.org/
  26. Koehler, M. J., & Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.
  27. Ligas, M. R. (2002). Evaluation of Broward county alliance of quality schools project. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 7(2), 117-139. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327671ESPR0702_2
  28. McCulloch, A. W., & Lovett, J. N. (2023). Exploring math with technology: Practices for secondary math teachers. London: Taylor & Francis.
  29. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
  30. Pizzo, J., Svrcek, N. S., Colantonio-Yurko, K., Kelley, A., Miller, H. C., & Coppola, N. (2023). Using PICRAT to develop digital graphic organizers. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 96(6), 189-199.
  31. Puentedura, R. R. (2012). Transforming learning through technology: Goals and models. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2012/12/12/TransformingLearningThroughTechnologyGoalsAndModels.pdf
  32. Puentedura, R. R. (2014). SAMR: First steps. Retrieved from http://www.hippasus.com/rrpweblog/archives/2014/11/13/SAMR_FirstSteps.pdf
  33. Salomon, G., Globerson, T., & Guterman, E. (1989). The computer as a zone of proximal development: Internalizing reading-related metacognitions from a reading partner. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(4), 620-627.
  34. Shotlekov, I. (2021). Technology integration evaluation and critical self-reflection using the Picrat model in the math and it Classrooms In Proceedings of the thirty ninth spring conference of the union of Bulgarian Mathematicians Albena.
  35. Wang, L. (2023). Adoption of the PICRAT model to guide the integration of innovative technologies in the teaching of a linguistics course. Sustainability, 15(5), 3886.
  36. Xin, J. F., & Rieth, H. (2001). Video-assisted vocabulary instruction for elementary school students with learning disabilities. Information Technology in Childhood Education Annual, 2001(1), 87-103.