수산해양기술연구 (Journal of the Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology)

  • 제60권1호
  • /
  • Pages.80-86
  • /
  • 2024
  • /
  • 2671-9940(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-9924(eISSN)
한국수산해양기술학회 (The Korean Society of Fisheries and Ocean Technology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

날개수에 따른 허브리스 림 추진기의 성능 분석 : CFD를 이용한 접근

Performance analysis of hubless rim-driven thruster based on the number of blades: a CFD approach

  • 김형호 (경상국립대학교 기계소재융합공학부) ;
  • 이창제 (한국해양대학교 해사산업연구소)
  • Hyoung-Ho KIM (School of Mechanical Material Convergence Engineering, Gyeongsang National University) ;
  • Chang-Je LEE (Institute of Maritime Industry, Korea Maritime and Ocean University)
  • 투고 : 2023.12.22
  • 심사 : 2024.02.05
  • 발행 : 2024.02.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We analyzed the performance of hubless rim propellers based on the number of blades, maintaining a fixed pitch ratio and expanded area ratio, using computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Thrust coefficient, torque coefficient and efficiency according to the number of blades were analyzed. In addition, the pressure distribution on the discharge and suction sides of the blade was analyzed. As the advance ratio increases, the thrust coefficient decreases. The highest thrust was shown when the advance ratio was lowest. For the three, four, five and six-blades, the torque coefficient tended to decrease as the advance ratio increased. In the case of seven and eight-blades, the torque coefficient tended to increase as the advance ratio increased. The maximum efficiency was found when the advance ratio was 0.8. When the three-blade, it showed high efficiency at all advance ratios. A high pressure distribution was observed at the leading edge of the discharge blade, and a low pressure distribution was observed at the trailing edge. Applying a hubless rim-driven thruster with the three-blade can generate higher thrust and increase work efficiency.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2023년도 교육부의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 기초연구사업임(No. 2022R1I1A1A01070686).

참고문헌

  1. Celik IB, Ghia U, Roache PJ, Freitas CJ, Coleman H and Raad PE. 2008. Procedure for estimation and reporting of uncertainty due to discretization in CFD applications. J Fluids Eng Trans ASME 130, 0780011-0780014. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2960953.
  2. Chen Y, Wang L and Hua HX. 2017. Longitudinal vibration and unsteady thrust transmission of the rim driven thruster induced by ingested turbulence. Ocean Eng 131, 149-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.01.001.
  3. Hsieh MF, Chen JH, Yeh YH, Lee CL, Chen PH, Hsu YC and Chen YH. 2007. Integrated design and realization of a hubless rim-driven thruster, in: IECON Proceedings (Industrial Electronics Conference). 3033-3038. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.2007.4460298.
  4. Jiang H, Ouyang W, Sheng C, Lan J and Bucknall R. 2022. Numerical investigation on hydrodynamic performance of a novel shaftless rim-driven counter-rotating thruster considering gap fluid. Appl Ocean Res 118, 102967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2021.102967.
  5. Kim DY and Kim YT. 2019a. Study on attack-angle optimization of a Rim-driven propeller using CFD. J Korean Soc Mar Eng 43, 701-709. https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2019.43.9.701.
  6. Kim DY and Kim YT. 2019b. Fundamental design of a 75-kW-rim-driven propeller. J Korean Soc Mar Eng 43, 31-39. https://doi.org/10.5916/jkosme.2019.43.1.31.
  7. Lee CJ, Heo MA, Cho GR and Kim HH. 2022. A study on the wake characteristics of rim-driven propeller for underwater robot using the PIV. J Korean Soc Fish Technol 58, 68-74. https://doi.org/10.3796/KSFOT.2022.58.1.068.
  8. Roache PJ. 1994. Perspective: A method for uniform reporting of grid refinement studies. J Fluids Eng 116, 405-413. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2910291.
  9. Roache PJ. 2003. Conservatism of the grid convergence index in finite volume computations on steady-state fluid flow and heat transfer. J Fluid Eng 125, 731-739. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1588692
  10. Santoso A, Arief IS and Kurniawan AT. 2017. Performance analysis rim driven propeller as a propulsor using open water test. Int J Mar Eng Innov Res 2, 2548-1479. https://doi.org/10.12962/j25481479.v2i1.2470.
  11. Song BW, Wang YJ and Tian WL. 2015. Open water performance comparison between hub-type and hubless rim driven thrusters based on CFD method. Ocean Eng 103, 55-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.04.074.
  12. Witte M, Hieke M and Wurm FH. 2019. Identification of coherent flow structures and experimental analysis of the hydroacoustic emission of a hubless propeller. Ocean Eng 188, 106248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.106248.
  13. Yakovlev AY, Sokolov MA and Marinich NV. 2011. Numerical design and experimental verification of a RIM-driven thruster. Proc 2nd Int Symp Mar Propulsors, 396-403
  14. Yan X, Liang X, Ouyang W, Liu Z, Liu B and Lan J. 2017. A review of progress and applications of ship shaft-less rim-driven thrusters. Ocean Eng 144, 142-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceaneng.2017.08.045.
  15. Zhang S, Zhu X and Zhou ZL. 2013. Hydrodynamic performance analysis of hubless rim-driven propulsors, in: Applied Mechanics and Materials. 2565-2568. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.256-259.2565.