DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of DTC between two-level and three-level inverters for LV propulsion electric motor in ship

선박 추진용 저압 전동기에 대한 2레벨 및 3레벨 인버터의 직접토크제어 비교

  • Ki-Tak RYU (Ocean Technology Training Team, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Jong-Phil KIM (Ocean Polytech Team, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology) ;
  • Yun-Hyung LEE (Ocean Technology Training Team, Korea Institute of Maritime and Fisheries Technology)
  • 류기탁 (한국해양수산연수원 해양기술교육팀) ;
  • 김종필 (한국해양수산연수원 오션폴리텍팀) ;
  • 이윤형 (한국해양수산연수원 해양기술교육팀)
  • Received : 2024.02.06
  • Accepted : 2024.02.27
  • Published : 2024.02.28

Abstract

In compliance with environmental regulations at sea and the introduction of unmanned autonomous ships, electric propulsion ships are garnering significant attention. Induction machines used as propulsion electric motor (PEM) have maintenance advantages, but speed control is very complicated and difficult. One of the most commonly used techniques for speed control is DTC (direct torque control). DTC is simple in the reference frame transformation and the stator flux calculation. Meanwhile, two-level and three-level voltage source inverters (VSI) are predominantly used. The three-level VSI has more flexibility in voltage space vector selection compared to the two-level VSI. In this paper, speed is controlled using the DTC method based on the specifications of the PEM. The speed controller employs a PI controller with anti-windup functionality. In addition, the characteristics of the two-level VSI and three-level VSI are compared under identical conditions. It was confirmed through simulation that proper control of speed and torque has been achieved. In particular, the torque ripple was small and control was possible with a low DC voltage at low speed in the three-level VSI. The study confirmed that the application of DTC, using a three-level VSI, contributes to enhancing the system's response performance.

Keywords

References

  1. Abad G, Rodriguez MA and Poza J. 2008. Two-level VSC based predictive direct torque control of the doubly fed induction machine with reduced torque and flux ripples at low constant switching frequency. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 23, 1050-1061. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2008.921160.
  2. Buja G, Casadei D and Serra G. 1998. Direct stator flux and torque control of an induction motor: theoretical analysis and experimental results. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 1, T50-T64. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.1998.723933.
  3. Casadei D, Grandi G, Serra G and Tani A. 1994. Effects of flux and torque hysteresis band amplitude in direct torque control of induction machines. Proceedings of IECON'94 - 20th Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics 1, 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1109/IECON.1994.397792.
  4. Cho PS. 2005. The stator resistance compensation for direct torque control of sensorless induction motor. M.S. Thesis, Anyang University, Korea, 1-46.
  5. Dalessandro L, Round SD and Kolar JW. 2008. Center-point voltage balancing of hysteresis current controlled three-level PWM rectifiers. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 23, 2477-2488. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPEL.2008.2002060.
  6. Depenbrock M.. 1988. Direct self-control (DSC) of inverter-fed induction machine. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 3, 420-429. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.17963.
  7. Park HS. 2015. A study on the finite control set model predictive torque control method of an induction motor using 2-level and 3-level inverters. M.S. Thesis, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Korea, 1-52.
  8. Ryu KT and Lee YH. 2021. A study on the training contents of AC drive of the HV electrical propulsion ships. The Journal of Fisheries and Marine Sciences Education 33, 1347-1357. https://doi.org/10.13000/JFMSE.2021.12.33.6.1347.
  9. Sahu MK, Panigrahi BP and Panda AK. 2011. An utility friendly direct torque control technique of three phase induction motor with two-level inverter using 180 degree conduction mode. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 3, 4120-4130.
  10. Schibili N, Nguyen T and Rufer A. 1998. Three-phase multilevel converter for high-power induction motors. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics 13, 978-986. https://doi.org/10.1109/63.712325.
  11. Takahashi I and Noguchi T. 1986. A new quick-response and high-efficiency control strategy of an induction motor. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications IA-22, 820-827. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIA.1986.4504799.