DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Narrative Review of Clinical Impact of Head-Hip Offset Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

  • Sunho Kim (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Seung-Jae Hyun (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Jae-Koo Lee (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine) ;
  • Ki-Jeong Kim (Department of Neurosurgery, Spine Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine)
  • Received : 2023.08.17
  • Accepted : 2023.09.25
  • Published : 2024.03.01

Abstract

In adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery, mechanical failure (MF) has been a significant concern for spine surgeons as well as patients. Despite earnest endeavors to prevent MF, the absence of a definitive consensus persists, owing to the intricate interplay of multifarious factors associated with this complication. Previous approaches centered around global spinal alignment have yielded limited success in entirely forestalling MF. These methodologies, albeit valuable, exhibited limitations by neglecting to encompass global balance and compensatory mechanisms within their purview. In response to this concern, an in-depth comprehension of global balance and compensatory mechanisms emerges as imperative. In this discourse, the center of gravity and the gravity line are gaining attention in recent investigations pertaining to global balance. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the global balance and a comprehensive understanding of related concepts and knowledge. Moreover, it delves into the clinical ramifications of the contemporary optimal correction paradigm to furnish an encompassing understanding of global balance and the current optimal correction strategies within the context of ASD surgery. By doing so, it endeavors to furnish spine surgeons with a guiding compass, enriching their decision-making process as they navigate the intricate terrain of ASD surgical interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. An S, Hyun SJ, Lee JK, Yang SH, Kim KJ : Postoperative gravity line-hip axis offset as a substantial risk factor for mechanical failure after adult spinal deformity correction surgery. Neurosurgery 92 : 998-1005, 2023
  2. Bari TJ, Ohrt-Nissen S, Hansen LV, Dahl B, Gehrchen M : Ability of the global alignment and proportion score to predict mechanical failure following adult spinal deformity surgery-validation in 149 patients with two-year follow-up. Spine deform 7 : 331-337, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2018.08.002
  3. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, D'Acunzi G, Perrin G : Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22 Suppl 6(Suppl 6) : S834-S841, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z
  4. Baum GR, Ha AS, Cerpa M, Zuckerman SL, Lin JD, Menger RP, et al. : Does the Global Alignment and Proportion score overestimate mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity correction? J Neurosurg Spine 34 : 96-102, 2020 https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.6.SPINE20538
  5. Charpak G : Prospects for the use in medicine of new detectors of ionizing radiation. Bull Acad Natl Med 180 : 161-168; discussion 168, 1996
  6. Dubousset J : Three-dimensional analysis of the scoliotic deformity in Weinstein SL (ed) : The pediatric spine: principles and practice, ed 1. New York : Raven Press, 1994, pp479-496
  7. Ferrero E, Liabaud B, Challier V, Lafage R, Diebo BG, Vira S, et al. : Role of pelvic translation and lower-extremity compensation to maintain gravity line position in spinal deformity. J Neurosurg Spine 24 : 436- 446, 2016 https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.SPINE14989
  8. Garg B, Mehta N, Bansal T, Malhotra R : EOS® imaging: concept and current applications in spinal disorders. J Clin Orthop Trauma 11 : 786-793, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcot.2020.06.012
  9. Glattes RC, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Kim YJ, Rinella A, Edwards C 2nd : Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity following long instrumented posterior spinal fusion: incidence, outcomes, and risk factor analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30 : 1643-1649, 2005 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000169451.76359.49
  10. Ha Y, Maruo K, Racine L, Schairer WW, Hu SS, Deviren V, et al. : Proximal junctional kyphosis and clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery with fusion from the thoracic spine to the sacrum: a comparison of proximal and distal upper instrumented vertebrae. J Neurosurg Spine 19 : 360-369, 2013
  11. Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Homma T, et al. : Standing sagittal alignment of the whole axial skeleton with reference to the gravity line in humans. J Anat 230 : 619-630,
  12. Hasegawa K, Okamoto M, Hatsushikano S, Shimoda H, Ono M, Watanabe K : Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects. Eur Spine J 25 : 3675-3686, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4702-2
  13. Hyun SJ, Jung JM : Spinal deformity surgery : it becomes an essential part of neurosurgery. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 61 : 661-668, 2018 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2018.0150
  14. Hyun SJ, Kim KJ, Jahng TA : The differential effect of cervical kyphosis correction surgery on global sagittal alignment and health-related quality of life according to head- and trunk-balanced subtype. J Neurosurg Spine 34 : 839-848, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3171/2020.9.SPINE201309
  15. Hyun SJ, Rhim SC : Clinical outcomes and complications after pedicle subtraction osteotomy for fixed sagittal imbalance patients : a long-term follow-up data. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47 : 95-101, 2010 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.47.2.95
  16. Kim CW, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ : Systematic review of reciprocal changes after spinal reconstruction surgery : do not miss the forest for the trees. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 64 : 843-852, 2021 https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2020.0234
  17. Kim KR, Le Huec JC, Jang HJ, Noh SH, Park JY, Ha Y, et al. : Which is more predictive value for mechanical complications: fixed thoracolumbar alignment (T1 pelvic angle) versus dynamic global balance parameter (odontoid-hip axis angle). Neurospine 18 : 597-607, 2021 https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2142452.226
  18. Kim YC, Lenke LG, Lee SJ, Gum JL, Wilartratsami S, Blanke KM : The cranial sagittal vertical axis (CrSVA) is a better radiographic measure to predict clinical outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery than the C7 SVA: a monocentric study. Eur Spine J 26 : 2167-2175,
  19. Kim YJ, Bridwell KH, Lenke LG, Glattes CR, Rhim S, Cheh G : Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult spinal deformity after segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion: minimum five-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33 : 2179-2184, 2008 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817c0428
  20. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP : Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults with spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : E599-E606, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181aad219
  21. Le Huec JC, Hasegawa K : Normative values for the spine shape parameters using 3D standing analysis from a database of 268 asymptomatic Caucasian and Japanese subjects. Eur Spine J 25 : 3630-3637, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4485-5
  22. Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S : Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J 20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5) : 558-563, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1939-7
  23. Le Huec JC, Thompson W, Mohsinaly Y, Barrey C, Faundez A : Sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 28 : 1889-1905, 2019 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-06083-1
  24. Lee JH, Kim JU, Jang JS, Lee SH : Analysis of the incidence and risk factors for the progression of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical treatment for lumbar degenerative kyphosis: minimum 2-year followup. Br J Neurosurg 28 : 252-258, 2014 https://doi.org/10.3109/02688697.2013.835369
  25. Lee JK, Hyun SJ, Kim KJ : Reciprocal changes in the whole-body following realignment surgery in adult spinal deformity. Asian Spine J 16 : 958-967, 2022 https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2021.0451
  26. Lee JK, Hyun SJ, Yang SH, Kim KJ : Reciprocal changes following cervical realignment surgery. Neurospine 19 : 853-861, 2022 https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2249938.469
  27. Marks M, Stanford C, Newton P : Which lateral radiographic positioning technique provides the most reliable and functional representation of a patient's sagittal balance? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34 : 949-954, 2009 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318199650a
  28. Marks MC, Stanford CF, Mahar AT, Newton PO : Standing lateral radiographic positioning does not represent customary standing balance. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28 : 1176-1182, 2003 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.BRS.0000067271.00258.51
  29. Maruo K, Ha Y, Inoue S, Samuel S, Okada E, Hu SS, et al. : Predictive factors for proximal junctional kyphosis in long fusions to the sacrum in adult spinal deformity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38 : E1469-E1476, 2013 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a51d43
  30. Melhem E, Assi A, El Rachkidi R, Ghanem I : EOS® biplanar X-ray imaging: concept, developments, benefits, and limitations. J Child Orthop 10 : 1-14, 2016 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11832-016-0713-0
  31. Mendoza-Lattes S, Ries Z, Gao Y, Weinstein SL : Proximal junctional kyphosis in adult reconstructive spine surgery results from incomplete restoration of the lumbar lordosis relative to the magnitude of the thoracic kyphosis. Iowa Orthop J 31 : 199-206, 2011
  32. Mohanty S, Lai C, Mikhail C, Greisberg G, Hassan FM, Stephan SR, et al. : Outcomes and reoperation rates of adult spinal deformity patients with baseline sagittal malalignment based on the cranial axis to the hip at 2 years postoperatively. J Neurosurg Spine 39 : 301-310, 2023
  33. Noh SH, Ha Y, Obeid I, Park JY, Kuh SU, Chin DK, et al. : Modified global alignment and proportion scoring with body mass index and bone mineral density (GAPB) for improving predictions of mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. Spine J 20 : 776-784, 2020 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2019.11.006
  34. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, Berthonnaud E, Dimnet J : The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : E320-E325, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000218263.58642.ff
  35. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL : Biomechanical analysis of the spinopelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 20 Suppl 5(Suppl 5) : 609-618, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-1928-x
  36. Schwab F, Lafage V, Boyce R, Skalli W, Farcy JP : Gravity line analysis in adult volunteers: age-related correlation with spinal parameters, pelvic parameters, and foot position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31 : E959-E967, 2006 https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000248126.96737.0f
  37. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, Buchowski J, Coe J, Deinlein D, et al. : Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37 : 1077-1082, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31823e15e2
  38. Soroceanu A, Diebo BG, Burton D, Smith JS, Deviren V, Shaffrey C, et al. : Radiographical and implant-related complications in adult spinal deformity surgery: incidence, patient risk factors, and impact on healthrelated quality of life. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 40 : 1414-1421, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001020
  39. Vernazza S, Alexandrov A, Massion J : Is the center of gravity controlled during upper trunk movements? Neurosci Lett 206 : 77-80, 1996 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(96)12464-2
  40. Yagi M, Akilah KB, Boachie-Adjei O : Incidence, risk factors and classification of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 36 : E60-E68, 2011 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181eeaee2
  41. Yagi M, Daimon K, Hosogane N, Okada E, Suzuki S, Tsuji O, et al. : Predictive probability of the global alignment and proportion score for the development of mechanical failure following adult spinal deformity surgery in Asian patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 46 : E80-E86, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000003738
  42. Yagi M, King AB, Boachie-Adjei O : Incidence, risk factors, and natural course of proximal junctional kyphosis: surgical outcomes review of adult idiopathic scoliosis. Minimum 5 years of follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 37 : 1479-1489, 2012 https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31824e4888
  43. Yagi M, Takeda K, Machida M, Asazuma T : Discordance of gravity line and C7PL in patient with adult spinal deformity--factors affecting the occiput-trunk sagittal discordance. Spine J 15 : 213-221, 2015 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.08.010
  44. Yilgor C, Sogunmez N, Boissiere L, Yavuz Y, Obeid I, Kleinstuck F, et al. : Global Alignment and Proportion (GAP) score: development and validation of a new method of analyzing spinopelvic alignment to predict mechanical complications after adult spinal deformity surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99 : 1661-1672, 2017  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.16.01594