References
- Agarwal, H., & Vaghela, P. S. (2018). Work Values of Gen Z: Bridging the Gap to the Next Generation. National Conference on Innovative Business Management Practice in 21st Century, December, Gujarat, India. 1-26.
- Ajzen, I. (1989). Attitude Structure and Behavior. In A. R. Pratkanis, S. J. Breckler, & A. G. Greenwald (Eds.), Attitude Structure and Function (pp.241-274), Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Alexandrakis, J. (2021). Cycling towards Sustainability: The Transformative Potential of Urban Design thinking in a Sustainable Living Lab. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 9, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trip.2020.100269
- Arnould, M., Morel, L., & Fournier, M. (2022). Embedding Non-industrial Private Forest Owners in Forest Policy and Bioeconomy Issues using a Living Lab Concept. Forest Policy and Economics, 139, 1-19.
- Awwal, S., Soliman-Junior, J., Ayo-Adejuyigbe, M., Tzortzopoulos, P., & Kagioglou, M. (2022). Social Housing Retrofit Living Lab: Methodological Approach. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1101, 1-11.
- Baccarne, B., Schuurman, D., Mechant, P., & De Marez, L. (2014). The Role of Urban Living Labs in a Smart City. Proceedings of the 25th ISPIM Conference - Innovation for Sustainability Economy & Society (pp.1-16). June 8 - 11, Dublin, Ireland.
- Battisti, S. (2014) Social Innovation in Living Labs : The Micro-level Process Model of Public-private Partnerships. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 5(4/5), 328-348. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIRD.2014.064146
- Berberi, A., Beaudoin, C., McPhee, C., Guay, J., Bronson, K., & Nguyen, V. M. (2023). Enablers, Barriers, and Future Consideraions for Living Lab Effectiveness in Environmental and Agricultural Sustainability Transitions: A Review of Studies evaluating Living Labs. Local Environment, 1-20, Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
- Bergvall-Kareborn, B., & Stahlbrost, A. (2009). Living Lab - An Open and Citizen-Centric Approach for Innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, January, 1-16.
- Buhr, K., Federley, M., & Karlsson, A. (2016). Urban Living Labs for Sustainability in Suburbs in Need of Modernization and Social Uplift. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(1), 27-34.
- Compagnucci, L., Spigarelli, F., Coelho, J., & Duarte, C. (2021). Living Labs and User Engagement for Innovation and Sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 1-18.
- Dell'Era, C., & Landoni, P. (2014). Living Lab: A Methodology between User-Centered Design and Participatory Design. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 137-154. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12061
- Dolot, A. (2018). The Characteristics of Generation Z. E-Mentor, 2(74), 44-50, Warsaw: School of Economics. https://doi.org/10.15219/em74.1351
- Edvardsson, B., Tronvoll, B., Gruber, T. (2011). Expanding Understanding of Service Exchange and Value Vo-creation: A Social Construction Approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(2), 327-339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0200-y
- Feurstein, K., Hesmer, A., Hribernik, K. A., Thoben, K., & Schumacher, J. (2008). Living Labs: A New Development Strategy. In Schumacher, J. & Niitamo, V. P. (Eds.), European Living Labs - A New Approach for Human Centric Regional Innovation (pp.1-14), Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag.
- Folstad, A. (2008a). Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review. The Electronic Journal for Virtual Organizations and Networks, 10, 99-131.
- Folstad, A. (2008b). Towards a Living Lab for the Development of Online Community Services. The Electronic Journal of Virtual Organizations and. Networks, 10, 47-58.
- Francis, T., & Hoefel, F. (2018). 'True Gen': Generation Z and Its Implications for Companies. November, McKinsey&Company.
- Gasco, M. (2017). Living Labs: Implementing Open Innovation in the Public Sector. Government Information Quarterly, 34, 90-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.09.003
- Hakkarainen L., & Hyysalo S. (2013). How do We Keep the Living Laboratory Alive? Learning and Conflicts in Living Lab Collaboration. Technology Innovation Management Review, 3, 16-22. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/749
- Hill, R. (2022). Generational Harmony Saves the World: How the Power of Generation Theory, Gen Z Youth, and Activism can mitigate the Climate Crisis. Undergraduate Scholarship and Creative Works, 1. University of Central Florida.
- Hossain, M., Leminen, S., & Westerlund, M. (2019). A Systematic Review of Living Lab Literature. Journal of Cleaner Production, 213, 976-988. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.257
- Kupperschmidt, B. R. (2000). Multigeneration Employees: Strategies for Effective Management. Health Care Manager, 19(1), 65-76. https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-200019010-00011
- Motta, P. C., Schewe, C. D., & Rossi, M. (2000). Generational Marketing: Exploring Cohort-Programmed Values and Their Implications on Cross-Cultural Variations in Consumer Behavior between Brazil and United States. Proceedings of the Innovations in Business Practices: The Roles of Globalization, Regional Integration and Technology of Global Business and Technology Association (pp.1-19), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
- Mukherjee, A. S., Sahay, S., Kumar, R., Banta, R., & Joshi, N. (2023). A Living Lab within a Lab: Approaches and Challenges for Scaling Digital Public Health in Resource-Constrained Settings. Frontiers in Public Health, August, 1-14.
- Mulgan, G. (2012). The Theoretical Foundations of Social Innovation. In A. Nicholls, & A. Murdock (Eds.), Social Innovation: Blurring Boundaries to Reconfigure Markets (pp.33-65), Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.
- Nicolas, T. (2015). Understanding the Millennials Generation. Journal of Business Diversity, 15(1), 39-47.
- Park, J., & Fujii, S. (2023). Civic Engagement in a Citizen-led Living Lab for Smart Cities: Evidence from South Korea. Urban Planning, 8(2), 93-107.
- Shin, D. (2019). A Living Lab as Socio-technical Ecosystem: Evaluating the Korean Living Lab of Internet of Things. Government Information Quarterly, 36, 264-275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.08.001
- Sjoman, M., Ringenson, T., & Kramers, A. (2020). Exploring Everyday Mobility in a Living Lab based on Economic Interventions. European Transport Research Review, 12(5), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0391-3
- Tabata, N., Tsukada, M., Kubo, K., Inoue, Y., Miroku, R., Odashima, F., Shiratori, K., Sekiya, T., Sengoku, S., Shiroyama, H., & Kimura, H. (2022). Living Lab for Citizens' Wellness: A Case of Maintaining and Improving a Healthy Diet under the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(1254), 1-17.
- Toma, S., Gradinaru, C., Hudea, O., & Modreanu, A. (2023). Perceptions and Attitudes of Generation Z Students towards the Responsible Management of Smart Cities. Sustainability, 15, 1-40.
- Waes, A., Nikolaeva, A., & Raven, R. (2021). Challenges and Dilemmas in Strategic Urban Experimentation: An Analysis of Four Cycling Innovation Living Labs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 172, 1-12.
- Wehrmann, C., Pentzold, C., Rothe, I., & Bischof, A. (2023). Introduction: Living Labs under Construction. Journal of Science Communication, 22(3), 1-8.
- Westerlund, M., Leminen, S., & Habib, C. (2018). Key Constructs and a Definition of Living Labs as Innovation Platforms. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(12), 51-62. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1205