DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring the Model of Social Enterprise in Sport: Focused on Organization Form(Type) and Task

스포츠 분야 사회적기업의 모델 탐색: 조직형태 및 과제

  • 박상현 (서울대학교 체육교육과) ;
  • 박주영 (상명대학교 미래교육원)
  • Received : 2023.12.22
  • Accepted : 2024.02.20
  • Published : 2024.02.28

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to diagnose various problems arising around social enterprises in the sport field from the perspective of the organization and derive necessary tasks and implications. In order to achieve the purpose of the study, the study was largely divided into three stages, and the results were derived. First, the main status and characteristics of social enterprises in the sport field were examined. The current status was analyzed focusing on aspects such as background and origin, legislation and policy, organizational goals, organizational structure and procedures, and organizational characteristics. Social enterprises in the sport sector were in their early stages, and the government's social enterprise policy goal tended to focus on increasing the number of social enterprises in a short period of time through financial input. In addition, it was found that most individual companies rely on government subsidy support due to insufficient profit generation capacity. In the second stage, we focused on the situational factors that affect the functional performance of social enterprises in the sport field. As a result of reviewing the value, ideology, technology, and history of the organization, which are situational factors, it was derived that when certified as a social enterprise in the sport field and supported by the central government or local governments, political control is strong to some extent and exposure to the market is not severe. In the last third step, tasks and implications were derived to form an appropriate organization for social enterprises in the sport field. After the social enterprise ecosystem in the sport sector has been established to some extent, it is necessary to gradually move from the current "government-type" organization to the "national enterprise" organization. This is true in light of the government's limited financial level, not in the short term, but in order for the organization of social enterprises in the sports sector to survive in the long term.

이 연구의 목적은 스포츠 분야 사회적기업을 둘러싸고 발생하는 여러 문제점들을 조직의 관점에서 진단하고 필요한 과제 및 시사점을 도출하는 데 있다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위해 크게 세 가지 단계로 구분하여 연구를 진행, 결과를 도출하였다. 첫 번째로는 스포츠 분야 사회적기업의 주요 현황 및 특성 등에 대하여 살펴보았다. 배경 및 기원, 법제 및 정책, 조직목표, 조직구조 및 절차, 조직특성 등의 측면을 중심으로 현황을 분석하였다. 스포츠 분야 사회적기업은 초기단계로서 정부의 사회적기업 정책목표는 재정투입을 통해 단기간 내 사회적기업의 수를 늘리는 것에 초점을 맞추는 경향이 있었다. 그리고 개별 기업들의 수익창출 여력이 미흡하여 정부의 보조금 지원에 의존하는 경우가 대다수인 것으로 파악되었다. 두 번째 단계에서는 스포츠 분야 사회적기업의 기능수행에 영향을 미치는 상황적 요인에 대하여 중점적으로 살펴보았다. 상황적 요인인 조직의 가치와 이념, 기술, 역사 등을 검토한 결과, 스포츠 분야 사회적기업으로 인증 받아 중앙정부나 지방자치단체로부터 지원을 받는 경우 정치적 통제는 어느 정도 강하고 시장에 노출 정도는 심하지 않은 '관청형' 조직의 형태로 나타나는 것을 도출할 수 있었다. 마지막 세 번째 단계에서는 스포츠 분야 사회적기업에 적정한 조직의 형태를 갖추기 위한 과제 및 시사점을 도출하였다. 스포츠 분야 사회적 기업 생태계가 어느 정도 정착된 이후에는 현재의 '관청형' 조직에서 '국민기업' 조직으로 점차 나아갈 필요가 있다. 이는 정부의 제한된 재정 수준을 감안해서도 그러하며, 단기적인 생존이 아니라 장기적으로 스포츠 분야 사회적기업이라는 조직이 살아남을 수 있기 위해서도 그러한 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. M. Auteri. (2004). The Enterpreneurial Establishment of a Nonprofit Organization. Public Organization Review, 3(2), 171-189.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024240914282
  2. S. Campbell. (1998). Social Entrepreneurship: How to Develop New Social Purpose Business Ventures. Health Care Strategic Management, 16(5), 17-8.  https://doi.org/10.1097/00126450-199803000-00004
  3. D. U. Kim. (2022). A Study on the Exceptional Understanding of Academics and Field in the Definition of International Development-Type Social Enterprises. Journal of Social Value and Enterprise, 15(3), 3-24. DOI : 10.32675/ses.2022.15.3.001 
  4. S. G. Kim, J. W. Han & I. Y. Lee. (2021). The Effect of Types of Corporate Philanthropy in Sports Companies on Corporate Image, Corporate Trust and Purchase Intention: A Moderating Role of Authenticity. The Korean Journal of Physical Education, 60(2), 99-117. DOI : 10.23949/kjpe.2021.3.60.2.8 
  5. Social Enterprise Promotion Act (Enforcement August 2, 2012 Act No. 11275, February 1, 2012, partially amended) https://www.law.go.kr/lsSc.do?section=&menuId=1&subMenuId=15&tabMenuId=81&eventGubun=060101&query=%EC%82%AC%ED%9A%8C%EC%A0%81%EA%B8%B0%EC%97%85+%EC%9C%A1%EC%84%B1%EB%B2%95#undefined. 
  6. Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency. (2023). List of Certified Social Enterprises. Gyeonggi: Korea Social Enterprise Promotion Agency. 
  7. Y. C. Kim. (2022). The Theory of Public Administration. Seoul: Pakyoungsa. 
  8. N. H. Han. (2018). Methods for Maximizing the Economic and Social Value of Sports through Athletic Job Creation. The Korean Journal of Sport, 16(3), 301-313. 
  9. Y. H. Chun. (2015). Organizational Autonomy: Theory and Public Policy. July 2017 Summer Conference of The Korean Association For Public Administration. Seoul: The Korean Association For Public Administration. 
  10. R. A. Dahl & C. E. Lindblom. (1953). Politics, Economics, and Welfare. IL: The University of Chicago Press. 
  11. J. W. Creswell & D. L. Miller. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124-130.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
  12. M. Kim & J. J. Nam. (2022). A Study on Social Entrepreneurship for Enhancing the Sustainability of Non-Profit Sports Organizations. Korean Society of Sport Policy, 20(4), 15-38. 
  13. H. S. Um(2005). Concept and Implications of Social Enterprise in the European Sense. Cities and Poverty, 76, 78-117. 
  14. K. H. Kim & J. H. Ban. (2006). An Exploratory Study on the Concepts and Types of Social Enterprise in Korea. Quarterly Journal of Labor Policy, 6(4), 31-54. 
  15. E. G. Choi & E. H. Choi. (2021). Testing Effects of Co-operatives on Locations of Social Enterprises in Korea Using Generalized Linear Models. Social Economy & Policy Studies, 11(3), 69-98. DOI : 10.22340/seps.2021.08.11.3.69 
  16. Ministry of Employment and Labor. (2013). A plan to promote social enterprise revitalization. Sejong: Ministry of Employment and Labor. 
  17. S. J. Han. (2005). Beyond Markets and Countries. Ulsan: Ulsan University Press. 
  18. S. Y. Kim, H. Y. Kwon & Y. O. Han. (2010). The study on the success factors of Corporate Associated Social Enterprise. Korean NPO Review, 8(3), 133-166. 
  19. M. Aiken. (2006). British Social Enterprises. International Labor Brief, 4(6), 22-30. 
  20. J. A. Kerlin. (2006). Social Enterprise in the United States and Europe: Understanding and Learning from the Differences. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 17, 246-262.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-006-9016-2
  21. H. Y. Ryu, J. H. Lee & S. C. Lee. (2020). A Study on the Effects of Social Enterprise Government Subsidies for Social and Economic Performance. Journal of Digital Convergence, 18(11), 149-157. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2020.18.11.149 
  22. J. Y. Hwang, H. J. Cho & B. K. Kim. (2021). The Role of Social Enterprise and Social Entrepreneur through Social Problem Mapping. Journal of Public Policy Studies, 38(3), 323-354. DOI : 10.33471/ILA.38.3.12