DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Exploring Promotion Duration Congruence for Best-Seller vs. Limited Edition Products

베스트셀러와 한정판 상품의 판매촉진 기간 일치성 효과에 대한 탐색적 연구

  • Dongkyun AHN (Kyungil University, Department of Global Business) ;
  • Se-Bum PARK (Yonsei University, School of Business)
  • Received : 2024.02.07
  • Accepted : 2024.02.26
  • Published : 2024.03.30

Abstract

Purpose: Despite the popularity of sales promotion as one of the key marketing tactics employed by many companies today, relatively little effort has been devoted to examining an interaction effect between promotion cues and promotion duration. Therefore, this study aims to examine how promotion cues and promotion duration will jointly affect consumers' attitudes toward promotions and purchase intentions. Research design, data, and methodology: The present study conducted an online experiment through the Qualtrics program in which a total of 141 participants were recruited from the Cloud panel members in the U.S. The experiment employed a 2(promotion cue: best-seller vs. limited edition) × 2(promotion duration: long vs. short) full factorial between-subjects design. Result: In the condition of best-selling sales promotion cue, a long promotion duration induced more positive promotion attitude and higher purchase intention, while in the condition of limited-edition sales promotion cue, the use of a short promotion duration contributed more positive promotion attitude and greater purchase intention. Conclusions: Marketers need to take the congruence between promotion cues and promotion duration into full consideration when designing effective sales promotion strategy.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by Yonsei Business Research Institute

References

  1. Ahn, D., & Park, S. (2022). Would it be better to offer more free gifts in a gift with purchase promotion? focusing on promotion message framing and the dual role of the number of free gifts. Korean Journal of Marketing, 37(4), 75-97 https://doi.org/10.15830/kjm.2022.37.4.75
  2. Berger, J., & Heath, C. (2007). Where consumers diverge from others: Identity signaling and product domains. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(2), 121-134. https://doi.org/10.1086/519142
  3. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A benefit congruency framework of sales promotion effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.64.4.65.18071
  4. Chi, I., Han, K., Choi, Y, Son, J., & Kim, J. (2014). Analysis on topokki franchise industry and its proactive activities: Focused on kukdae toppokki. Journal of Franchise Management, 5(1), 27-47.
  5. Cialdini, R. B., Demaine, L. J., Sagarin, B. J., Barrett, D. W., Rhoads, K., & Winter, P. L. (2006). Managing social norms for persuasive impact. Social Influence, 1(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/15534510500181459
  6. Das, G., Mukherjee, A., & Smith, R. J. (2018). The perfect fit: The moderating role of selling cues on hedonic and utilitarian product types. Journal of Retailing, 94(2), 203-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2017.12.002
  7. Gitlin, T. (2007). Media unlimited, revised edition: How the torrent of images and sounds overwhelms our lives. New York: Henry Holt.
  8. Gierl, H., Plantsch, M., & Schweidler, J. (2008). Scarcity effects on sales volume in retail. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 18(1), 45-61.
  9. Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35(3), 472-482.
  10. Graeff, T. R. (1996). Image congruence effects on product evaluations: The role of self-monitoring and public/private consumption. Psychology & Marketing, 13(5), 481-499. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199608)13:5<481::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-5
  11. Griskevicius, V., Goldstein, N. J., Mortensen, C. R., Sundie, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (2009). Fear and loving in Las Vegas: Evolution, emotion, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 46(3), 384-395. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.46.3.384
  12. Ha, Y. W., & Hoch, S. J. (1989). Ambiguity, processing strategy, and advertising-evidence interactions. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 354-360.
  13. Higgins, E. T., Rholes, W. S., & Jones, C. R. (1977). Category accessibility and impression formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(2), 141-154.
  14. Jha, S., Deitz, G. D., Hart, P., & Royne Stafford, M. B. (2019). Sales promotions for preorder products: The role of time-of-release. Psychology & Marketing, 36(9), 875-890. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21242
  15. Kim, E.-J. (2022). The effects of brand attachment, brand name, and brand image congruence on brand attitude, WOM and revisit intentions in the restaurant sector. Korean Journal of Franchise Management, 13(2), 53-66
  16. Ku, H. H., Kuo, C. C., & Kuo, T. W. (2012). The effect of scarcity on the purchase intentions of prevention and promotion motivated consumers. Psychology & Marketing, 29(8), 541-548. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20541
  17. Meyers-Levy, J., & Tybout, A. M. (1989). Schema congruity as a basis for product evaluation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(1), 39-54. https://doi.org/10.1086/209192
  18. Montaner, T., & Pina, J. M. (2008). The effect of promotion type and benefit congruency on brand image. Journal of Applied Business Research, 24(3).
  19. Na, J., & Choi, W. G. (2008). The impact of need for cognition and congruence between brand and program context on PPL effect. Journal of Product Research, 26(3), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.36345/KACST.2008.26.3.006
  20. Raghubir, P. (2005). Framing a price bundle: The case of "buy/get" offers. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 14(2), 123-128. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420510592617
  21. Song, H., & Ko, K. (2021). Effects of foodservice franchise's advertising model characteristics on model satisfaction, brand image, and purchase intention. Korean Journal of Franchise Management, 12(4), 25-40
  22. Wu, L., & Lee, C. (2016). Limited edition for me and best seller for you: The impact of scarcity versus popularity cues on self versus other-purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 92(4), 486-499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2016.08.001