Acknowledgement
This study was supported by from the Shingu University Industry-Academic Cooperation Foundation Grant 2023.
References
- Miyati T, Fujita H, Kasuga T, et al. Measurements of MTF and SNR(f) using a subtraction method im MRI. Physics in Medicine and Biology. 2002;47:2961-72. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12222859/ https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/47/16/311
- Hahm HK. The study on the subject development of MRI image quality evaluation. Department of Radiology, Graduate school of Public Health Eulji University; 2008. Retrieved from https://lib.eulji.ac.kr/eul/data/data/DataSearchList.csp?New=C0&SrchCondi01=%E2%96%B2&QSrchType01=&SrchT ype01=T0&SrchKey01=The+study+on+the+subject+development+of+MRI+image+quality+evaluation+Department+of+Radiology&type=&SrchTarget=B
- Lee JW, Ahn KJ, Lee SK, Na DG, Oh CH, Chang YM, et al. Usefulness of ACR MRI phantom for quality assurance of MRI instruments. Journal Korean Society Radiology. 2006;54(1):47-55. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292951275_Usefulness_of_ACR_MRI_Phantom_for_Quality_Assurance_of_MRI_Instruments https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2006.54.1.47
- American College of Radiology. Phantom test guidance for the ACR MRI accreditation program. Reston: American College of Radiology; 2000. Retrieved from https://www.acraccreditat ion.org/-/media/ACRAccreditation/Documents/MRI/LargePhantomGuidance.pdf
- American College of Radiology. MRI quality control manual. American College of Radiology, Reston; 2004. Retrieved from https://www.acr.org/-/media/ACR/Files/Clinical-Resources/QC-Manuals/MR_QCManual.pdf
- Min JW, Jeong HW, Kim KW, et al. Study on the resolution characteristics by using magnetic resonance imaging 3.0T. Journal of Radiological Science and Tec hnology. 2020;43(4):251-7. Retrieved from http://oc ean.kisti.re.kr/IS_mvpopo212L.do?method=list&poi d=ksrs1&kojic=BSSGBL&sVnc=v43n4&sFree= https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2020.43.4.251
- Min JW, Jeong HW, Kim SC. Evaluation of noise power spectrum characteristics by using magnetic resonance imaging 3.0T. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2021;44(1):279-88. Retrieved from http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/IS_mvpopo212L.do?method=list&poid=ksrs1&kojic=BSSGBL&sVnc=v44n1&sFree=
- Min JW, Jeong HW, Han JH, et al. Evaluation of the resolution characteristics by using American college of radiology phantom for magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2022;45(1):11-7. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2022.45.1.11
- Jeong HW, Min JW, Kim JM, et al. Performance characteristic of a CsI(Tl) flat panel detector radiography system. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2012;35(2):109-17. Retrieved from http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/IS_mvpopo212L.do?method=l ist&poid=ksrs1&kojic=BSSGBL&sVnc=v35n2&sFree=
- Min JW, Jeong HW, Kang HK. Evaluation of the resolution characteristics by using ATS 535H phantom for ultrasound medical imaging. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2023;46(1) 15-21. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2023.46.1.15
- Kim KW, Jeong HW, Min JW, et al. Measurement of image quality according to the time of computed radiography system. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2015;38(4):365-74. Retrieved from http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/IS_mvpopo212L.do?method=list&poid=ksrs1&kojic=BSSGBL&sVnc=v38n4&sFree= https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2015.38.4.05
- Min JW, Jeong HW, Kim KW, et al. Comparison of noise power spectrum in measurements by using inte rnational electrotechnical commission standard devices in indirect digital radiography. Journal of Radiological Science and Technology. 2018;41(5): 457-62. Retrieved from http://ocean.kisti.re.kr/IS_mvpopo212L.do?method=list&poid=ksrs1&kojic=BSSGBL&sVnc=v41n5&sFree= https://doi.org/10.17946/JRST.2018.41.5.457
- IEC(International Electrotechnical Commission) 62220-1. Medical electrical equipment Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices Part 1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency. Geneva; 2003. Retrieved from http://websites.umich.edu/~ners580/ners-bioe_481/lectures/pdfs/2003-10-IEC_62220-DQE.pdf
- Och JG, Clarke GD, Sobol WT, Rosen CW, Mun SK. Acceptance testing of magnetic resonance imaging systems: Report of AAPM nuclear magnetic resonance task group No. 6. Med Phys. 1992;19:217-29. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1620053/ https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596903
- Choi YJ, Kweon DC. Evaluation of TOF MR anagiography and imaging for the half scan factor of cerebral artery. Journal of the Korean Magnetics Society. 2016;26(3):92-8. Retrieved from https://www.magnetics.or.kr/submission/journal/pages/archives.vm?isrc=tkms.allforone21.com/tkms/service/article_list.do&vol=26&no=3&year=2016&month=06 https://doi.org/10.4283/JKMS.2016.26.3.092
- Mohapatra SM, Turley JD, Prince JR, et al. Transfer function measurement and analysis for magnetic resonance imager. Med. Phys, 1991;18(6):1141-4. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/1753895/ https://doi.org/10.1118/1.596622
- Fujita H, Tasai DY, Itoh T, et al. A simple method for determining the modulation transfer function in digital radiography. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1992; 11(1):34-9. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18218354/ https://doi.org/10.1109/42.126908
- Samei E, Flynn MJ, Reimann DA, et al. A method for measuring the presampled MTF of digital radiographic systems using an edge test device. Medical Physics. 1998;25(1):102-13. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9472832/ https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598165
- Greer PB, Van Doorn T. Evaluation of an algorithm for the assessment of the MTF using an edge method. Medical Physics. 2000;27(9):2048-59. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11011732/ 1011732
- Steckner MC, Drost DJ, Prato FS. Computing the modulation transfer function of a magnetic resonance imager. Med. Phys. 1994;21(3):483-9. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8208224/ https://doi.org/10.1118/1.597310