Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (한국터널지하공간학회 논문집)

Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association (한국터널지하공간학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of excavation damage zone during TBM excavation - A large deformation FE analysis study

TBM 굴착으로 인한 굴착손상영역 범위 추정 - 대변형 수치해석 연구

  • Seheon Kim (Dept. of Urban Engineering, Hanbat National University) ;
  • Dohyun Kim (Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hanbat National University)
  • 김세헌 (국립한밭대학교 도시공학과) ;
  • 김도현 (국립한밭대학교 건설환경공학과 )
  • Received : 2023.11.03
  • Accepted : 2023.12.22
  • Published : 2024.01.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Analyzing the tunnel excavation behavior and its effect on the surrounding ground involves large deformation behavior. Therefore, in order to properly simulate the tunnel excavation process and rigorously investigate the actual effect of excavation on surrounding ground and tunnel structure large deformation analysis method is required. In this study, two major numerical approaches capable of considering large deformations behavior were applied to investigate the effect of tunnel boring machine excavation on the surrounding ground: coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian (CEL) and the automatic remeshing (AR) method. Relative performance of both approaches was evaluated through the ground response due to TBM excavation. The ground response will be quantified by estimating the range of the excavation damaged zone (EDZ). By comparing the results, the range of the EDZ will be suggested on the vertical and horizontal direction along the TBM excavation surface. Based on the computed results, it was found that the size of EDZ around the excavation surface and the tendencies was in good agreement among the two approaches. Numerical results clearly show that the size of the EDZ around the tunnel tends to be larger for rock with higher RMR rating. The size of the EDZ is found to be direct proportional to the tunnel diameter, whereas the depth of the tunnel is inversely proportional due to higher confinement stress around the excavation surface.

터널 굴착으로 인한 지반의 거동 분석은 대변형 영역의 거동을 고려해야 한다. 따라서 본 논문에서는 TBM 터널 굴착으로 인한 주변 지반에 대한 영향을 실제 현장 조건과 동일 조건에서 분석하기 위하여 대변형 유한요소 해석을 수행하였다. 지반의 대변형 거동을 모사하고 예측함에 있어 가장 널리 활용되는 두 가지 해석 기법 - coupled Eulerian Lagrangian (CEL)과 auto-remeshing (AR) 기법 - 을 적용하여 TBM 굴착 과정을 모사하였고 그에 따른 주변 지반에 발생하는 손상영역의 범위를 예측하였다. 굴착손상영역의 범위는 두 기법을 통해 도출된 결과와 굴착손상영역을 정의하는 실험적인 기준을 종합하여 추정하였다. 해석 결과, 두 대변형 해석 기법을 이용하여 도출된 굴착손상영역은 서로 비슷한 크기로 수렴하였고, 기존 연구의 실험 및 계측을 통해 확인된 굴착손상영역 크기와 모양, 경향과도 일치하는 것으로 나타났다. 굴착 되는 지반의 RMR 등급이 좋을수록 굴착손상영역의 크기는 더 커지고, 터널의 직경과는 정비례하는 것으로 나타났다. 반면에, 터널의 심도가 깊을수록 지반의 구속압이 커져서 굴착손상영역은 상대적으로 작게 형성되는 것으로 확인되었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Aglawe, J.P. (1999), Unstable and violent failure around underground openings in highly stressed ground, Ph.D. Thesis, Queen's University at Kingston. 
  2. Argyroudis, S.A., Pitilakis, K.D. (2012), "Seismic fragility curves of shallow tunnels in alluvial deposits", Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 35, pp. 1-12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2011.11.004
  3. Arson, C., Gatmiri, B. (2012), "Thermo-hydro-mechanical modeling of damage in unsaturated porous media: theoretical framework and numerical study of the EDZ", International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 36, No. 3, pp. 272-306.  https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1005
  4. Bauer, C., Homand-Etienne, F., Ben Slimane, K., Hinzen, K.G., Reamer, S.K. (1996), "Damage zone characterization in the near field in the Swedish ZEDEX tunnel using in situ and laboratory measurements", Eurock '96, Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 1345-1352. 
  5. Carbonell, J.M., Onate, E., Suarez, B. (2010), "Modeling of ground excavation with the particle finite-element method", ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, Vol. 136, No. 4, pp. 455-463.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)EM.1943-7889.0000086
  6. Chang, S.H., Choi, S.W., Bae, G.J., Jeon, S. (2006), "Performance prediction of TBM disc cutting on granitic rock by the linear cutting test", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 21, No. 3, pp. 271-281.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.12.131
  7. Chern, J.C., Yu, C.W., Shiao, F.Y. (1998), "Tunnelling in squeezing ground and support estimation", Proceedings of the Regular Symposium of Sedimentary Rock Engineering, Taipei, pp. 192-202. 
  8. Cho, J.W., Jeon, S., Yu, S.H., Chang, S.H. (2010), "Optimum spacing of TBM disc cutters: a numerical simulation using the three-dimensional dynamic fracturing method", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 230-244.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2009.11.007
  9. Diederichs, M.S., Kaiser, P.K., Eberhardt, E. (2004), "Damage initiation and propagation in hard rock during tunnelling and the influence of near-face stress rotation", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 5, pp. 785-812.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.02.003
  10. Emsley, S., Olsson, O., Stenberg, L., Alheid, H.J., Falls, S. (1997), ZEDEX - A study of damage and disturbance from tunnel excavation by blasting and tunnel boring, SKB TR 97-30, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. 
  11. Fairhurst, C., Damjanac, B. (1996), "The excavation damaged zone - an international perspective", Proceedings of the Excavation Disturbed Zone Workshop - Designing the Excavation Disturbed Zone for a Nuclear Waste Repository in Hard Rock, Winnipeg, pp. 4-14. 
  12. Hammerer, N. (2013), Influence of steering actions by the machine operator on the interpretation of TBM performance data, Research Report, Pennsylvania State University. 
  13. Harrison, J.P., Hudson, J.A. (2000), Engineering Rock Mechanics: Part 2: Illustrative Worked Examples, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 260-263. 
  14. Hashash, Y.M.A., Hook, J.J., Schmidt, B., Yao, J.I.C. (2001), "Seismic design and analysis of underground structures", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 247-293.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7
  15. Hashash, Y.M.A., Karina, K., Koutsoftas, D., O'Riordan, N. (2010), "Seismic design considerations for underground box structures", Proceedings of the Earth Retention Conference, Bellevue, pp. 1-4. 
  16. Hashash, Y.M.A., Park, D., Yao, J.I.C. (2005), "Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 435-441.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2005.02.004
  17. Hoek, E., Bieniawski, Z.T. (1965), "Brittle fracture propagation in rock under compression", International Journal of Fracture Mechanics, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 137-155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186851
  18. Hu, Y., Randolph, M.F. (1998), "A practical numerical approach for large deformation problems in soil", International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 327-350.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9853(199805)22:5<327::AID-NAG920>3.0.CO;2-X
  19. ITA (2000), Recommendations and guidelines for tunnel boring machines (TBMs), International Tunnel Association, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 35-40. 
  20. Jeong, S.S., Han, Y.C., Kim, Y.M., Kim, D.H. (2014), "Evaluation of the NATM tunnel load on concrete lining using the ground lining interaction model", KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 672-682.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0597-9
  21. Jonsson, M., Backstrom, A., Feng, Q., Berglund, J., Johansson, M., Mas Ivars, D., Olsson, M. (2009), Aspo hard rock laboratory: studies of factors that affect and controls the excavation damaged/disturbed zone, SKB R-09-17, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. 
  22. Kim, D. (2021), "Large deformation finite element analyses in TBM tunnel excavation: CEL and auto-remeshing approach", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 116, 104081. 
  23. Kim, D., Jeong, S. (2021), "Estimation of the excavation damage zone in TBM tunnel using large deformation FE analysis", Geomechanics and Engineering, Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 323-335.  https://doi.org/10.12989/GAE.2021.24.4.323
  24. Ko, J.Y. (2015), Evaluation of bearing capacity for open-ended piles with soil plugging, Ph.D. Thesis, Yonsei University, pp. 120-137. 
  25. Kwon, S., Lee, C.S., Cho, S.J., Jeon, S.W., Cho, W.J. (2009), "An investigation of the excavation damaged zone at the KAERI underground research tunnel", Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 1-13.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2008.01.004
  26. Lee, S.Y., Kim, D.H., Jeong, S.S. (2016), "A study on the excavation damage zone (EDZ) under TBM advancement based on large deformation technique (coupled Eulerian-Lagrangian)", Journal of the Korean Geotechnical Society, Vol. 32, No. 12, pp. 5-13.  https://doi.org/10.7843/KGS.2016.32.12.5
  27. Martin, C.D. (1993), The strength of massive Lac du Bonnet granite around underground openings, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Manitoba. 
  28. Martin, C.D., Christiansson, R., Soderhall, J. (2001), Rock stability considerations for siting and constructing a KBS-3 repository: based on experiences from Aspo HRL, AECLs URL, tunneling and mining, SKB TR-01-38, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. 
  29. Martini, C.D., Read, R.S., Martino, J.B. (1997), "Observations of brittle failure around a circular test tunnel", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 1065-1073.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)90200-8
  30. Martino, J.B., Dixon, D.A., Kozak, E.T., Gascoyne, M., Vignal, B., Sugita, Y., Fujita, T., Masumoto, K. (2007), "The tunnel sealing experiment: an international study of full-scale seals", Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C, Vol. 32, No. 1-7, pp. 93-107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2006.04.023
  31. Orazalin, Z. (2017), Analysis of large deformation offshore geotechnical problems in soft clay, Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, pp. 285-286. 
  32. Park, D., Lee, T.H., Kim, H., Park, J.S. (2016), "Identification of damage states and damge indices of single box tunnel from inelastic seismic analysis", Journal of Korean Tunnelling and Underground Space Association, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 119-128.  https://doi.org/10.9711/KTAJ.2016.18.2.119
  33. Perras, M.A., Diederichs, M.S. (2016), "Predicting excavation damage zone depths in brittle rocks", Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 60-74.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2015.11.004
  34. Read, R.S. (2004), "20 years of excavation response studies at AECL's Underground Research Laboratory", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, Vol. 41, No. 8, pp. 1251-1275.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.09.012
  35. Read, R.S., Chandler, N.A., Dzik, E.J. (1998), "In situ strength criteria for tunnel design in highly-stressed rock masses", International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, Vol. 35, No. 3, pp. 261-278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-9062(97)00302-1
  36. Saiang, D. (2004), Damaged rock zone around excavation boundaries and its interaction with shotcrete, Licentiate Thesis, Department of Civil and Mining Engineering, Division of Rock Mechanics, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden. 
  37. Sakurai, S. (1984), "Displacement measurements associated with the design of underground openings", Proceedings of the International Symposium of Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Zurich, Vol. 2, pp. 1163-1178. 
  38. Siren, T. (2015), Excavation damage zones, fracture mechanics simulation and in situ strength of migmatitic gneiss and pegmatitic granite at the nuclear waste disposal site in Olkiluoto, Western Finland, Ph.D. Thesis, Aalto University. 
  39. Stepansson, O., Shen, B., Rinne, M., Amemiya, K., Yamashi, R., Toguri, S. (2008), "FRACOD modeling of rock fracture and permeability change in excavation damaged zones", Proceedings of the 12th International Conference of International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics (IACMAG), Goa, pp. 1048-1059. 
  40. Tian, Y., Cassidy, M., Randolph, M., Wang, D., Gaudin, C. (2014), "A simple implementation of RITSS and its application in large deformation analysis", Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 56, pp. 160-167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2013.12.001
  41. Wang, D., Bienen, B., Nazem, M., Tian, Y., Zheng, J., Pucker, T., Randolph, M. (2015), "Large deformation finite element analyses in geotechnical engineering", Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 65, pp. 104-114.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.12.005
  42. Winberg, A. (1991), The role of the disturbed rock zone in radioactive waste repository safety and performance assessment: a topical discussion and international overview, SKB TR 91-25, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management Co. 
  43. Xu, H., Arson, C. (2014), "Anisotropic damage models for geomaterials: theoretical and numerical challenges", International Journal of Computational Methods, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1342007.