DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Hysteretic characteristics of medium- to low-rise RC structures controlled by both shear and flexure evaluated by FEA and pseudo-dynamic testing

  • Ju-Seong Jung (Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center, Hanyang University) ;
  • Bok-Gi Lee (Innovative Durable Building and Infrastructure Research Center, Hanyang University) ;
  • Kang-Seok Lee (Department of Architectural Engineering & Smart City Engineering, Hanyang University)
  • Received : 2023.03.06
  • Accepted : 2023.10.10
  • Published : 2024.02.25

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to propose new hysteretic characteristics of medium- to low-rise RC structures controlled by both shear and flexure. Through previous study, the dual lateral force-resisting system composed of shear and flexural failure members has a new failure mechanism that cooperates to enhance the flexural capacity of the flexural failure member even after the failure of the shear member, and the existing theoretical equation significantly underestimates the ultimate strength. In this study, the residual lateral strength mechanism of the dual lateral force-resisting system was analyzed, and, as a result, an equation for estimating the residual flexural strength of each shear-failure member was proposed. The residual flexural strength of each shear-failure member was verified in comparison with the structural testing results obtained in previous study, and the proposed residual flexural strength equation for shear-failure members was tested for reliability using FEA, and its applicable range was also determined. In addition, restoring-force characteristics for evaluating the seismic performance of the dual lateral force-resisting system (nonlinear dynamic analysis), reflecting the proposed residual flexural strength equation, were proposed. Finally, the validity of the restoring-force characteristics of RC buildings equipped with the dual lateral force-resisting system proposed in the present study was verified by performing pseudo-dynamic testing and nonlinear dynamic analysis based on the proposed restoring-force characteristics. Based on this comparative analysis, the applicability of the proposed restoring-force characteristics was verified.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This paper was supported by a grant (2021R1A2C2094779) from the National Research Foundation of the Korean government.

References

  1. Akkaya, Y., Guner, S. and Vecchio, F.J. (2013), "Modeling inelastic buckling behavior of reinforcing bars", Proceedings of the American Concrete Institute Conference, Phoenix, AZ, USA, October.
  2. Curkovic, I. (2019), "Seismic performance of steel plate shear walls with variable column flexural stiffness", Steel Compos. Struct., 33(1), 19-36. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.1.019.
  3. Dhakal, R.P. and Maekawa, K. (2002a), "Modeling for post-yield buckling of reinforcement", J. Struct. Eng., 128(9), 1139-1147. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1139).
  4. Dhakal, R.P. and Maekawa, K. (2002b), "Reinforcement stability and fracture of cover concrete in reinforced concrete members", J. Struct. Eng., 128(10), 1253-1262. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:10(1253).
  5. Dhakal, R.P. and Maekawa, K. (2002c), "Path-dependent cyclic stress-strain relationship of reinforcing bar including buckling", Eng. Struct., 24(11), 1383-1396. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(02)00080-9.
  6. Etawa, M.A.E., Kubo, T. and Ueno, K. (1998), "Seismic capacity of reinforced concrete buildings evaluated based on the basic structural index and nonlinear seismic analysis: Focus on buildings controlled by shear", Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Japan Annual Convention, Tokyo
  7. FEMA 310 (1988), Handbook for Seismic Evaluation of Buildings - A Prestandard, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C., USA.
  8. Fukuda, Y. (1969), "Study on the restoring force characteristics of reinforced concrete buildings", Proceedings of the Kanto District Symposium, the Architectural Institute of Japan, Tokyo, Japan, November.
  9. He, X.G. and Kwan, A.K.H. (2001), "Modeling dowel action of reinforcement bars for finite element analysis of concrete structures", Comput. Struct., 79(6), 595-604. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-7949(00)00158-9.
  10. Hilber, H.M., Hughes, T.J. and Taylor, R.L. (1977), "Improved numerical dissipation for time integration algorithms in structural dynamics", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 5(3), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290050306.
  11. Hisano, M. and Okada, T. (1975), "Earthquake response of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings with structural walls: SDOF parallel wall-frame system", Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Japan Annual Convention. Tokyo, Japan.
  12. Ibarra, L.F., Medina, R.A. and Krawinkler, H. (2005), "Hysteretic models that incorporate strength and stiffness deterioration", Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., 34(12), 1489-1511. https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.495.
  13. Inci Kocak, P. and Kabeyasawa, T. (2014), "Nonlinear reponse analysis and damage evaluation of a city office in Koriyama City", Bull. Int. Inst. Seismol. Earthq. Eng., 48, 91-96.
  14. Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association (2017), Japanese Standard for Seismic Evaluation of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings., Japan Building Disaster Prevention Association, Tokyo, Japan.
  15. Kubo, T. and Etawa, M.A.E. (1999), "Seismic capacity of reinforced concrete buildings evaluated based on the basic structural index and nonlinear seismic analysis: Focused on buildings controlled by flexure", Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Japan Annual Convention. Tokyo, Japan.
  16. Kubo, T., Akagi, T., Ueno, K. and Etawa, M.A.E. (1998), "Seismic capacity of reinforced concrete buildings constituted of flexural and shear failure members: Seismic capacity evaluation of seismic screening standards in Japan", Proceedings of the 10th Japan Earthquake Engineering Symposium, Tokyo, Japan, November.
  17. Kupfer, H., Hilsdorf, H.K. and Rusch, H. (1969), "Behavior of concrete under biaxial stress", ACI J., 87(2), 656-666.
  18. Lai, D. (2001), "Crack shear-slip in reinforced concrete elements", M.A.Sc. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  19. Lee, K.S. (2010), "Seismic capacity requirements for low-rise reinforced concrete buildings controlled by both shear and flexure", J. Adv. Concrete Technol., 8(1), 75-91. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.8.75.
  20. Lee, K.S. and Shin, S.W. (2013), "A new methodology for performance-based seismic evaluation of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings using nonlinear required strengths", J. Adv. Concrete Technol., 11, 151-166. https://doi.org/10.3151/jact.11.151.
  21. Lee, K.S., Lee, S.S., Kee, S.H. and Park, K.S. (206), "An experimental study on the seismic performance of medium- to low-rise RC structures controlled by both shear and flexure", Mag. Concrete Res., 68(10), 487-503. https://doi.org/10.1680/jmacr.15.00223. 
  22. Mander, J.B., Priestley, M.J.N. and Park. R. (1988), "Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 114(8), 1804-1826. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1988)114:8(1804).
  23. Matsukawa, K., Maeda, M., Al-Washali, H. and Takahashi, K. (2012), "Research for collapse of R/C frame composed of shear and flexure column", The 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September.
  24. Miyazawa, M., Ogura, K., Yamada, M. and Fukushima, J. (1976), "Earthquake response of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings with structural walls", Proceedings of the Architectural Institute of Japan Annual Convention, Tokyo, Japan.
  25. Molitierno, C., Del Vecchio, C., Di Ludovico, M. and Prota, A. (2023), "Pseudodynamic tests and numerical modelling for damage analysis of infilled RC frames", J. Earthq. Eng., 27, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2023.2183048.
  26. MTS (2002), Pseudodynamic Testing for 793 Controllers, MTS Systems Corporation, Eden Prairie, MI, USA.
  27. Murakami, M. (1980), "Required strength for probabilistic seismic design and damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures", Proceedings of 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkiye, September.
  28. Murakami, M. and Penzien, J. (1975), "Nonlinear response spectra for probabilistic seismic design and damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures", Report No. EERC 75-38; University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  29. Murakami, M. and Penzien, J. (1975), "Nonlinear response spectra for probabilistic seismic design and damage assessment of reinforced concrete structures", Report No. EERC 75-38, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA.
  30. Okamura, H. and Maekawa, K. (1991), "Nonlinear analysis and constitutive models of reinforced concrete", University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
  31. Popovics, S. (1973), "A numerical approach to the complete stress-strain curve of concrete", Cement Concrete Res., 3(5), 583-599. https://doi.org/10.1016/0008-8846(73)90096-3.
  32. Richart, F.E., Brandtzaeg, A. and Brown, R.L. (1928), "A study of the failure of concrete under combined compressive stresses", Bulletin No. 185, University of Illinois Engineering, Experimental Station, Urbana, IL, USA.
  33. Seckin, M. (1981), "Hysteretic Behaviour of cast-in-place exterior beam-column-slab subassemblies", Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  34. Takahashi, S., Yoshida, K., Ichinose, T., Sanada, Y., Matsumoto, K., Fukuyama, H. and Suwada, H. (2011), "Flexural deformation capacity of RC shear walls without column on compressive side", J. Struct. Constr. Eng., 76(660), 371-377. https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.76.371
  35. Takanashi, K., Udagawa, K. and Tanaka, H. (1980), "Pseudo-dynamic tests on a 2-storey steel frame by a computer-load test apparatus hybrid system", Proceedings of the 7th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Istanbul, Turkiye, September.
  36. Tokyo Soki Kenkyujo Company (2020), Tokyo, Japan. https://www.tml.jp/e/
  37. Umemura, H. (1973), Earthquake Resistant Design of Reinforced Concrete Buildings, Accounting for the Dynamic Effects of Earthquakes, Giho-do Publishing Co., Tokyo, Japan.
  38. Vecchio, F.J. (1992), "Finite element modeling of concrete expansion and confinement", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 118(9), 2390-2406. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1992)118:9(2390).
  39. Vecchio, F.J. (2000), "Disturbed stress field model for reinforced concrete: Formulation", ASCE J. Struct. Eng., 126(9), 1070-1077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:9(1070).
  40. Vecchio, F.J. and Collins, M.P. (1986), "The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subject to shear", ACI J., 83(2), 219-231.
  41. Walraven, J.C. (1981), "Fundamental analysis of aggregate interlock", ASCE J. Struct. Div., 107(11), 2245-2270. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005820.
  42. Wang, Z., Wang, J., Zhu, J. and Zhang, J. (2020), "A simplified method to assess seismic behavior of reinforced concrete columns", Struct. Concrete, 21(1), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.201800223.
  43. Wong, P.S. and Vecchio, F.J. (2002), "VecTor-2 and formworks user's manual", Technical Report, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
  44. Xu, J.G., Feng, D.C., Wu, G., Cotsovos, D.M. and Lu, Y. (2020), "Analytical modeling of corroded RC columns considering flexure-shear interaction for seismic performance assessment", Bull. Earthq. Eng., 18(5), 2165-2190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00770-6.
  45. Zhang, Q., Gong, J. and Ma, Y. (2014), "Seismic shear strength and deformation of RC columns failed in flexural shear", Mag. Concrete Res., 66(5), 234-248. https://doi.org/10.1680/macr.13.00221.