DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Influence of opening location, shape, and size on the behavior of steel beam columns

  • Mona M. Fawzy (Civil Engineering Program, The Higher Institute of Engineering, El-Shorouk Academy) ;
  • Fattouh M. F. Shaker (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University) ;
  • Alia M. Ayyash (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University) ;
  • Mohamed M. Salem (Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Helwan University)
  • Received : 2023.07.06
  • Accepted : 2023.10.13
  • Published : 2024.01.10

Abstract

The objective of this research is to study experimentally and numerically the behavior of steel beam columns with openings. Although the presence of openings in the beam columns is inevitable, finding ways to maintain strength is crucial. The studied parameters are opening shape, the ratio between opening height to specimen height, the percentage of opening location from support to beam column length, and web slenderness. Experimental tests are conducted including twelve specimens to study the effect of these parameters and record failure load, load deflection curve, and stress strain curve. Two failure modes are observed: local and flexural buckling. Interaction curves plotted from finite element model analysis are also used to expand the parametric study. Changing the location of the opening can decrease failure load by up to 7% and 60% in both normal and moment ratios respectively. Increasing the opening dimension can lead to a drop in the axial ratio by up to 29% and in the moment ratio by up to 74%. The weakest beam column behavior is noticed in specimens with rectangular openings which results from uneven and concentrated stresses around the opening. The main results of this research illustrate that the best location for opening is at 40% - 50% from beam column support. Also, it is advisable to use circular openings instead of rectangular openings in specimens having slender webs because moment ratios are raised by 85% accompanied by a rise in normal ratios by 9%.

Keywords

References

  1. ACI 318-11 (2011), Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary, American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, MI. 
  2. AISC 360-10 (2010), Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), Chicago (IL). 
  3. Al-Husainy, A.S., Al-Rifaie, A. and Ogaidi, W. (2020), "Behaviour of steel beams with circular web openings under impact loading", Mater. Sci. Eng., 888(1), 012069. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/888/1/012069. 
  4. Al-Jallad, S.A. and Al-Thairy, H. (2016), "Fffect of web opening on the axial load capacity of steel columns with cold formed thin walled section (CFS)", Kufa J. Eng., 7(3), 13-26.  https://doi.org/10.30572/2018/KJE/731200
  5. Alhatmey, I.A., Ekmekyapar, T. and Alrebeh, S.K. (2018), "Residual strength capacity of fire-exposed circular concrete-filled steel tube stub columns", Adv. Concrete Const., 6(5), 485-507. https://doi.org/10.12989/acc.2018.6.5.485. 
  6. American Institute of Steel Construction (2005), Manual of Steel Construction: Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings. AISC-LRFD. 
  7. ANSYS (2009), Finite Element Program, Swanson Analysis System, Inc., Release 12.1. 
  8. Darwin, D. (1990), Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings - American Institute of Steel Construction', Steel Design Guide Series, No. 2, Chicago, IL. 
  9. Darwin, D. and Lucas, W.C. (1990), "LRFD for steel and composite beams with web openings", Struct. Eng., ASCE, 116(6), 1579- 1593.  https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1990)116:6(1579)
  10. Deifalla, A.F., Fattouh, F.M., Fawzy, M.M. and Hussein, I.S. (2019), "Behavior of stiffened and unstiffened CFT under concentric loading, an experimental study", Steel Compos. Struct., 33(6), 793-803. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2019.33.6.793. 
  11. Dessouki, A.K., Yousef, A.H. and Fawzy, M.M. (2014), "Stiffener configuration of beam to concrete-filled tube column connections", Steel Compos. Struct., 17(1), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2014.17.1.083. 
  12. DIN 50125 (2016), "Testing of metallic materials - Tensile test pieces", German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut fur Normung), Berlin, Germany. 
  13. Elsawaf, S.A. and Hassan, M.M. (2018), "Behaviour of structural sub-assemblies of steel beams with openings in fire conditions", J. Construct. Steel Res., 148, 627-638 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcsr.2018.06.023. 
  14. Eurocode 4 (2004), Design of Composite Steel and Concrete Structures, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, 2004. 
  15. Fattouh, M.F. and Mahmoud, S. (2015), "Study of Darwin guidelines for non-compact and slender steel girders with web openings", IOSR J. Mech. Civil Eng. (IOSR-JMCE)g, 12(5), 72-85. 
  16. Fu, Q., Ding, F.X., Zhang, T., Wang, L. and Fang, C.J. (2018), "Composite action of hollow concrete-filled circular steel tubular stub columns", Steel Compos. Struct., 26(6), 693-703. https://doi.org/10.9790/1684-12517285. 
  17. Junus, M., Herman, P., Jonie, T. and Rudy, D. (2014), "Behavior of castellated beam column due to cyclic loads", Proc. of the Second Intl. Conf. on Advances in Civil and Structural Engineering - CSE 2014. 
  18. Kumari, E. and Saxena, D. (2021), "Buckling analysis of folded structures", Materials Today: Proceedings, 43, 1421-1430. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.09.179
  19. Le Hoang, A. and Fehling, E. (2017), "Numerical analysis of circular steel tube confined UHPC stub columns", Comput. Concrete, 19(3), 263-273. https://doi.org/10.12989/cac.2017.19.3.263. 
  20. Magdi A., Fattouh M. Fattouh, Mohammed M. Salem, Mona M. Fawzy, (2023),"The Behavior of Steel Beam Columns with Web Openings." Thesis Civil Engineering, Helwan University. 
  21. Neto, T.M.C. (2014), Analysis and Design of Composite Beams with Web Openings, Instituto Superior Tecnico. 
  22. Rodrigues, F., Vellasco, P.C.D.S., de Lima, L.R. and de Andrade, S.A. (2014), "Finite element modelling of steel beams with web openings", Engineering, 6, 886-913. https://doi.org/10.4236/eng.2014.613082. 
  23. Shaker, F.M., Ghanem, G.M., Deifalla, A.F., Hussein, I.S. and Fawzy, M.M. (2022), "Influence of loading method and stiffening on the behavior of short and long CFST columns", Steel Compos. Struct., 44(3), 281-293. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2022.44.3.281. 
  24. Singha, M.K., Kumari, E., Rasool, M. and Kumar, A. (2019), "Nonlinear elastic stability of web panels in built-up members", Int. J. Struct. Stab. Dyn., 19(06), 1950064.