DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Does the Digital Transformation of Chinese Agricultural Enterprises Really Improve Green Technology Innovation Performance?

  • Received : 2024.09.29
  • Accepted : 2024.12.05
  • Published : 2024.12.30

Abstract

Purpose: This study investigates the impact of digital transformation on green innovation in China's agricultural listed companies, focusing on the moderating role of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) performance. Research Design, Data and Methodology: This study uses quantitative research methods, selecting annual report data of China's agricultural listed companies from 2014 to 2023 and Huazheng ESG data, using a regression model of panel data analysis to explore the impact of digital transformation on green innovation and explore ESG moderating effect. Results: Digital transformation has a significant negative impact on green innovation (coefficient = -0.048, p < 0.05), particularly due to resource reallocation during technology upgrades. ESG performance moderates this relationship (interaction term coefficient = -0.113, p < 0.05), intensifying the negative effects rather than mitigating them. Conclusions: Digital transformation of agricultural enterprises is crucial to green technology innovation. However, the improvement of ESG performance has not only failed to alleviate this negative impact, but has made the problem worse. Specifically, ESG performance plays a key mediating role in the connection between digital transformation and green innovation, and this mediating role actually helps to amplify the negative consequences of digital transformation rather than reduce them.

Keywords

References

  1. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of information technology. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66-77.
  2. Buck, C., Clarke, J., Oliveira, R. T. de, & Desouza, K. C. (2023). Digital transformation in asset-intensive organisations: The light and the dark side. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 8(2), 100335.
  3. Chen, Z., & Xie, G. (2022). ESG disclosure and financial performance: Moderating role of ESG investors. International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, 102291.
  4. Cheng, H., Li, Y., Pang, Y., Zhao, J., & Fu, K. (2024). Can digital transformation change a firm's green innovation strategy? Evidence from China's heavily polluting industries. Heliyon, 10(3), e24676.
  5. Elamer, A. A., & Boulhaga, M. (2024). ESG controversies and corporate performance: The moderating effect of governance mechanisms and ESG practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(4), 3312-3327.
  6. Fang, Y. Q., & Chen, J. (2024). Development and significance of new energy technology in my country under the background of carbon peak and carbon neutrality. Materials Reports(S1), 35-40.
  7. He, Q., Ribeiro-Navarrete, S., & Botella-Carrubi, D. (2023). A matter of motivation: The impact of enterprise digital transformation on green innovation. Review of Managerial Science, 18(5), 1-30.
  8. Hong, C., Zhu, H., Sun, T., Chen, X., Wang, T., & Li, W. (2023). Does environmental regulation promote corporate green innovation? Empirical evidence from Chinese carbon capture companies. Sustainability, 15(2), 1-24.
  9. Liu, X. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation and green innovation. Industrial Engineering and Innovation Management, 6(2), 8-17.
  10. Luo, Y. H., & Liu, S. Y. (2023). The impact of analyst attention on corporate tax avoidance behavior - based on the moderating effect of ESG performance. Journal of Hunan Taxation College, 36(6), 15-23.
  11. Nirino, N., Santoro, G., Miglietta, N., & Quaglia, R. (2021). Corporate controversies and company's financial performance: Exploring the moderating role of ESG practices. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 162, 120341.
  12. Ren, C., Lee, S. J., & Hu, C. (2023). Digitalization improves enterprise performance: New evidence by text analysis. Sage Open, 13(2), 01-10.
  13. Sun, Y., & He, M. (2023). Does digital transformation promote green innovation? A micro-level perspective on the Solow paradox. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 11, 1134447.
  14. Wang, D., & Dou, W. (2024). Investigation on how carbon markets and digital transformation affect green innovation: Evidence from Chinese listed companies. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26, 22775-22800.
  15. Wang, F., & Sun, Z. (2022). Does the environmental regulation intensity and ESG performance have a substitution effect on the impact of enterprise green innovation: evidence from China? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8558.
  16. Wang, L., & Yan, J. (2023). Effect of digital transformation on innovation performance in China: Corporate social responsibility as a moderator. Frontiers in Environmental Science,11,1215866.
  17. Wang, L., Yu, X., & Zhang, Y. (2025). The effects of outward foreign direct investment on green technological innovation: A quasi-natural experiment based on Chinese enterprises. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 110, 107666.
  18. Wen, X. (2024). The digital transformation, funding constraints, and the green innovation of transportation companies. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 12, 1332051.
  19. Yan, J. W., & Guo, L. F. (2023). The impact of industrial agglomeration on corporate green innovation - based on the moderating effect of ESG performance. Technology and Innovation Management, 44(6), 672-678.
  20. Yang, Yutong. (2024). Research on digital transformation and management innovation of small and medium-sized enterprises. Modern Business Trade Industry, 22, 22-24.
  21. Zhang, W., & Meng, F. (2023). Enterprise digital transformation and regional green innovation efficiency based on the perspective of digital capability: Evidence from China. Systems, 11, 526.
  22. Zhao, C., Wang, W., & Li, X. (2021). How does digital transformation affect total factor productivity in enterprises? Finance & Trade Economics, 2021(07), 114-129.
  23. Zou, G., Yuan, Y., & Xu, Q. (2023). Environmental costs, fiscal subsidies and corporate green innovation. China Soft Science, 2023(2), 169-180.