Journal of Korean Society of Rural Planning (농촌계획)

Korean Society of Rural Planning (한국농촌계획학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Comparative Study of the Perceptions by Stakeholder on the Problems and Difficulties at Implementation Stages of the Agricultural Environment Conservation Program

농업환경보전프로그램 이행단계별 문제점 및 애로사항에 대한 이해당사자별 인식 비교

  • Kim, Soo-Jin (Institute of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Bae, Seung-Jong (Institute of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yoo, Seung-Hwan (Department of Rural and Bio-systems Engineering & BK21 Education and Research Unit for Climate-smart Reclaimed-Tideland Agriculture, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Na, Ra (Department of Rural and Bio-systems Engineering & BK21 Education and Research Unit for Climate-smart Reclaimed-Tideland Agriculture, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Son, Jeong-Woo (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Hur, Seung-Oh (National Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Rural Development Administration)
  • 김수진 (서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원) ;
  • 배승종 (서울대학교 그린바이오과학기술연구원) ;
  • 유승환 (전남대학교 지역.바이오시스템공학과 & BK21 기후지능형 간척지농업 교육연구팀) ;
  • 나라 (전남대학교 지역.바이오시스템공학과 & BK21 기후지능형 간척지농업 교육연구팀) ;
  • 손정우 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원) ;
  • 허승오 (농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원)
  • Received : 2023.11.21
  • Accepted : 2023.11.23
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program is a useful system for creating sustainable agriculture and environmentally friendly and comfortable rural areas. However, there are still many problems and difficulties, such as the establishment of necessary activities and plans by the residents themselves, and improvements are required. The degree of importance and difficulties according to the implementation stage of each stakeholder was quantified and compared with each other, and the specific difficulties recognized by on-site support organizations were structurally analyzed. It was analyzed that the importance and difficulties of the project implementation stage for local government officials and the project implementation planning stage for on-site support organizations were very high, indicating that they perceived the most need for improvement. On the other hand, 21 specific problems and difficulties were derived based on the results of the literature survey and stakeholder interviews. As a result of the structural analysis using the DEMATEL method, the most influential factor was the low understanding of the project by residents, the most influential factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, the most central factor was the lack of collecting and reflecting residents' opinions, and the most causal factor was the lack of education and promotion of the project. The results indicate that a more stable system can be established if continuous promotion and education, periodic meetings and discussions, active reflection of residents' opinions in project implementation plans, and simplification of implementation inspection and project cost execution through the implementation inspection platform are promoted. Despite the limitations, considering that no institutional analysis of agricultural environmental conservation programs has been conducted so far, the results of this study are expected to serve as a basis for the establishment of relevant policies in the future.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 농촌진흥청 국립농업과학원 국가농경지환경자원관리기술개발사업의 지원을 받아 연구되었음(PJ016025032022, 과제명: 농업환경보전 프로그램 평가지표 개발 및 이행점검 플랫폼 구축).

References

  1. Jung, N. S., 2021, Analysis of the Influence of Community Consciousness on Participation in Agricultural Environment Programs, Journal of Tourism and Leisure Research, 33(1): 377-394, doi: 10.31336/JTLR.2021.1.33.1.377
  2. Korea Rural Economic Institute(KREI), 2018, Finding Ways to improve the Agricultural Environment through the Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program.
  3. Korea Rural Economic Institute(KREI), 2019, Challenges and Ways to Improve the Agricultural Environmental Conservation Program.
  4. Hyun, J. G., Kim, S. J., Jung, W. S., Kim, J. O. and Yoo, G. Y., 2021, Quantifying the Effects of Agricultural Management Practices on Soil Carbon Storage in an Agricultural Environment Conservation Program, Journal of Climate Change Research, 12(6): 701-712, doi: https://doi.org/10.15531/KSCCR.2021.12.6.701
  5. Kim, H. W. and S ung, J. H., 2022, An Analysis of The Relative Importance for Target Selecting Criteria in Agricultural Environment Conservation Program, Korea Journal of Organic Agriculture, 30(4): 485-497, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11625/KJOA.2022.30.4.485
  6. Kim, M. H., Kim, M. K., Choi, S. K., Eo, J. U., Yeob, S. J. and Bang, J. H., 2021, Selection of Indicator Plants to Evaluate the Effects of Agri-environmental Conservation Program: On the Rice Paddy Fields in South Korea, Korean Journal of Environmental Agriculture, 40(3): 169-178, doi: https://doi.org/10.5338/KJEA. 2021.40.3.20
  7. Lankoski, J. and Cattaneo. A., 2010. Guidelines for Cost-effective Agri-Environmental Policy Measures, OECD, Paris.
  8. Lee, J. H, 2019, Practices and Improvements in Agricultural Environmental Conservation Programs, Agricultural Policy Research Quarterly, 70: 174-195.
  9. Martilla, J. A. and James, J. C., 1977, Importance-Performance Analysis, Journal of Marketing, 41(1): 77-79. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224297704100112
  10. Lim, S. G., So, S. C. and Lee, C. S., 2017, An empirical analysis of the performance of government 3.0 'service government' using IPA analysis, Korean Journal of Public Administration, 55(2): 137-167. https://doi.org/10.24145/KJPA.55.2.5
  11. Park, S. J. and Jeong, B. H., 2016, The evaluation of cultural tourism festival service quality using IPA: a study on the Chungjang memory festival, Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association, 28(2): 131-152.
  12. Kim, S. J., Bae, S. J. and Kim, D. S., 2022, Structural analysis of Deactivation Factors behind Urban-Rural Exchange using DEMATEL method, Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning, 28(1): 89-98, doi: https://doi.org/10.7851/ksrp.2022.28.1.089