DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of Social, Economic, and Environmental Impacts depending on Cultivation Methods - Based on Agricultural Income Survey Data and Smart Farm Survey Reports -

농산물 재배 방식에 따른 사회, 경제, 환경 영향 비교 - 농산물 소득조사 자료와 스마트팜 실태조사 보고서를 기반으로 -

  • Lee, Jimin (Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University) ;
  • Kim, Taegon (Department of Smart Farm, Jeonbuk National University)
  • 이지민 (서울대학교 농업생명과학연구원) ;
  • 김태곤 (전북대학교 스마트팜학과)
  • Received : 2023.11.02
  • Accepted : 2023.11.24
  • Published : 2023.11.30

Abstract

This study examined the impact of changes in agricultural production methods on society, the economy, and the environment. While traditional open-field farming relied heavily on natural conditions, modern approaches, including greenhouse and smart farming, have emerged to mitigate the effects of climate and seasonal variations. Facility horticulture has been on the rise since the 1990s, and recently, there has been a growing interest in smart farms due to reasons such as climate change adaptation and food security. We compared open-field spinach and greenhouse spinach using agricultural income survey data, and we also compared greenhouse tomato cultivation with smart farming tomato cultivation, utilizing data from the smart farm survey reports. The economic results showed that greenhouse spinach increased yield by 25.8% but experienced a 29% decrease in income due to equipment depreciation. In the case of tomato production in smart farms, both yield and income increased by 36-39% and 34-46%, respectively. In terms of environmental impact, we also compared fertilizer and energy usage. It was found that greenhouse spinach used 29% less fertilizer but 14% more energy compared to open-field spinach. Smart farming for tomatoes saw a negligible decrease in electricity and fuel costs. Regarding the social impact, greenhouse spinach reduced labor hours by 31%, and the introduction of smart farming for tomatoes led to an average 11% reduction in labor hours. This reduction is expected to have a positive effect on sustainable farming. In conclusion, the transition from open-field to greenhouse cultivation and from greenhouse cultivation to smart farming appears to yield positive effects on the economy, environment, and society. Particularly, the reduction in labor hours is beneficial and could potentially contribute to an increase in rural populations.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

본 연구는 정부(과학기술정보통신부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(NRF-2022R1A2C1004302)

References

  1. Byun, Jae-yeon, 2022, Smart Agriculture Development Project Promotion Status and Improvement Tasks, National Assembly Budget Office Business Evaluation Report. 
  2. Cho, Young Yel and Son, Junk Eek, 2012.10.18, Direction of High Value-added Materials and Cultivation System in Protected Horticulture, Horticulture abstracts, Jinju. 
  3. Choi, Chang Youl, 2022, A Study on Smart Farm 3.0 Strategy for Reinforcement of Domestic Agricultural Competitiveness. The e-Business Studies, 23(4), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.20462/tebs.2022.8.23.4.43 
  4. Choi, Don-woo and Lim, Cheong-ryong, 2018, Statistical analysis of Production Efficiency on the Strawberry Farms Using Smart Farming. Journal of Korean Society for Quality Management, 46(3), 707-716. https://doi.org/10.7469/JKSQM.2018.46.3.707 
  5. Jeong, Jin-young, Kang, Hyun-wook, Kang, Moon-soo and Choi, Yong-hoon, 2020, Automated Operation Algorithm for Reducing Power Consumption and Gaining Benefit in Smart Farm Environment with Energy Storage System. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 45(10), 1775-1781. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2020.45.10.1775 
  6. Jeong, Yoon-Su, 2023, Designing an Efficient Smart Farm Framework That Combines IoT Technology and Machine Learning Technology. Journal of Business Convergence, 8(2), 137-142. https://doi.org/10.31152/JB.2023.04.8.2.137 
  7. Jo, Yunhee, Lee, Kang Oh and Song, Kyung-Hwan, 2022, The Effects of Changes on the Will to Continue Farming Activities in the Introduction of Smart Farm in Horticultural Facilities : Comparison of Differences Between Groups According to Types of Agricultural Manager. The Journal of Korean Institute of Communications and Information Sciences, 47(11), 1957-1964. https://doi.org/10.7840/kics.2022.47.11.1957 
  8. Kim, In Sook, 1999, A Study on the Working Environment based on Agricultural Labor Types - Focused on Plastic House Workers and Ground Workers in Kyongbuk Province. The Jouranl of Applied Science and Technology, 8(1), 259-277. 
  9. Kim, Eun Joo, and Oh, Min Hong, 2022, Analysis of the Effect of Shortening Working Hours on Quality of Life. Ordo Economics Journal, 25(1), 19-45. https://doi.org/10.20436/OEJ.25.1.019 
  10. Korea Agricultural Technology Promotion Agency (KATPA), 2022, Common guidelines for calculating greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural products, Iksan. 
  11. Lee, Jae Kyung and Seol, Byung Moon, 2019, Intelligent Smart Farm A Study on Productivity : Focused on Tomato farm Households. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 14(3), 185-199.  https://doi.org/10.16972/APJBVE.14.3.201906.185
  12. Lee, Sangwon and Cho, Youngsang, 2020, Economic feasibility analysis of the renewable energy based business model in the agricultural sector and policy implications - Focusing on the "Smart Farms" using renewable energy -. Innovation studies, 15(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.46251/INNOS.2020.02.15.1.1 
  13. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA) & Korea Agency of Education, Promotion and Information Service in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (EPIS), 2023, 2022 Smart Agriculture Survey (Summary), Sejong. 
  14. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs (MAFRA), 2022, Field- and private-centered, 30% of agricultural production converted to smart agriculture 2022.10.5. press release. 
  15. Nam, Yooun-il, 2003, Present Status and Developmental Strategy of Protected Horticulture Industry in Korea. Journal of Korean Irrigation and Drainage, 10(2), 15-23. 
  16. Noh, Heesun and Lee, Yoonsuk, 2022, Analysis of Factors Influencing Decision to Introduce Smartfarm into Paprika Farm in Gangwon Province. Journal of Regional Studies and Development, 31(1), 79-90. https://doi.org/10.22739/IPAID.2022.31.1.79 
  17. Ryu, Jong-hee, Kim, Kye-hoon, So, Kyu-ho, Lee, Gil-zae, Kim, Gun-yeob and Lee, Deog-bae, 2011, LCA on Lettuce Cropping System by Top-down Method in Protected Cultivation. Korean Journal of Soil Science and Fertilizer, 44(6), 1185-1194. https://doi.org/10.7745/kjssf.2011.44.6.1185 
  18. Rural Development Administrateion, 2023, Agricutural income survey. 
  19. Smart farm Korea homepage, https://www.smartfarmkorea.net/ (accessed Oct. 2, 2023).