DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Assessment and Enhancement of Ecosystem Service on Hasidong Anin Coastal Sand Dune of Ecological and Landscape Conservation Area

하시동·안인사구 생태경관보전지역의 생태계서비스 평가와 증진 방안

  • Eun-Hye Lee (Dept. of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk Univ.) ;
  • Choong-Hyeon Oh (Dept. of Biological and Environmental Science, Dongguk Univ.)
  • 이은혜 (동국대학교 대학원 바이오환경과학과) ;
  • 오충현 (동국대학교 대학원 바이오환경과학과)
  • Received : 2023.08.17
  • Accepted : 2023.09.14
  • Published : 2023.10.31

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the ecosystem services and environmental sustainability index(ESI) of the Hasidong-Anin coastal sand dune ecological and landscapes conservation area using rapid assessment tools. As a result, the analysis of the environmental sustainability index, derived from the evaluation of ecosystem services in the Hasidong-Anin coastal sand dune ecological and landscapes conservation area, revealed that regulating services, cultural services, and supporting services were all rated below 50%. Especially, cultural and supporting services were identified as lacking. With these results, a SWOT analysis was conducted to develop strategies for enhancing ecosystem services in the Hasidong-Anin coastal sand dune ecological and landscapes conservation area. Six approaches were formulated, involving leveraging strengths as opportunities (SO strategy), minimizing threats using strengths (ST strategy), utilizing opportunities to address weaknesses (WO strategy), and mitigating weaknesses and threats (WT strategy). In the future, when promoting projects to enhance ecosystem services in the Hasidong-Anin coastal sand dune ecological and landscapes conservation area, it will be essential to address issues such as the restoration of currently damaged areas and prevention of future erosion-related damages. This will lead to an elevation of the value of the Hasidong-Anin coastal sand dune ecological and landscape conservation area.

본 연구는 강원도 강릉시에 위치한 하시동·안인사구 생태경관보전지역에서의 생태계서비스 평가와 증진방안 마련을 위하여 시행되었다. 연구방법으로 신속평가 도구를 이용한 생태계서비스 평가를 바탕으로 환경지속성지수 분석하였고, SWOT 분석을 통하여 생태계서비스 증진방안을 마련하였다. 하시동·안인사구 생태경관보전지역의 생태계서비스 평가 결과를 바탕으로 분석한 환경지속성지수는 조절서비스, 문화서비스, 지지서비스 모두 50% 미만으로 낮게 평가되었다. 특히 문화서비스, 지지서비스가 부족한 것으로 나타났다. 이러한 결과를 바탕으로 하시동·안인사구 생태경관보전지역의 생태계서비스 증진 방안을 마련하기 위하여 SWOT 분석을 시행하였다. 강점을 기회로 활용(SO전략), 강점을 이용한 위협요인 최소화(ST전략), 강점을 보완하기 위하여 기회를 활용(WO전략), 약점을 보완하고 위협을 최소화(WT전략)하는 생태계서비스 증진방안 6가지를 도출하였다. 향후 하시동·안인사구 생태경관보전지역에서 생태계서비스 증진사업을 추진할 때 현재 훼손된 지역의 복원과 향후 침식 등으로 인한 피해 방지 등 제시한 문제를 극복하고 이를 통하여 생태계서비스를 증진시켜 하시동·안인사구 생태경관보전지역의 가치를 높일 필요가 있다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ansoff, H.I.(1987) The emerging paradigm of strategic behavior. Strategic Management Journal 8: 501-515. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250080602
  2. Barbier, E., S. Hacker, C. Kennedy, E.W. Koch, A.C. Stier and B.R. Silliman(2011) The value of estuary and coastal ecosystem services. Ecological Monographs 81(2): 169-193. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1510.1
  3. BCA, FORES, FORWET(2013) Ecosystem services assessment in Mui Ca Mau National Park, Stockholm, Sweden. 29pp.
  4. Beach Management Tools-Concepts, Methodologies and Case Studies(2017) Methodologies and case studies, Coastal research library 24. Springer, pp.75-100.
  5. Brenner, J., J.A. Jimenez, R. Sarda and A. Garola(2010) An assessment of the non-market value of the ecosystem services provided by the Catalan coastal zone, Spain. Ocean & Coastal Management 53: 27-38.
  6. Choi, G.H. and D.H. Cho(2019) Distribution of natural landforms and their values as geomorphosites in Hasidong Area, Gangneung-si, South Korea. Journal of the Association of Korean Photo-Geographers 29(2): 41-52. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.35149/jakpg.2019.29.2.004
  7. Choi, G.H. and Y.M. Kim(2015) Distribution of coastal dunes and their conservation status in South Korea. Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association 22(3): 123-137.
  8. Choi, G.H., K.H. Yang, S.H. Jung, S.M. Park and S.Y. Lee(2016) Coastal changes detected using drone-based mapping in Hashidong Beach, Gangneung, South Korea. Journal of the Korean Geomorphological Association 23(4): 101-112. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.16968/JKGA.23.4.101
  9. Christie, M. and M. Rayment(2012) An economic assessment of the ecosystem service benefits derived from the SSSI biodiversity conservation policy in England and Wales. Ecosystem Services 1(1): 70-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2012.07.004
  10. De Giglio, M., N. Greggio, F. Goffo, N. Merloni, M. Dubbini and M. Barbarella(2019) Comparison of pixel-and object-based classification methods of unmanned aerial vehicle data applied to coastal dune vegetation communities: Casal borsetti case study. Remote Sensing 11(12): 1416.
  11. Ettritch, G., P. Bunting, G. Jones and A. Hardy(2018) Monitoring the coastal zone using earth observation: Application of linear spectral unmixing to coastal dune systems in Wales. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation 4(4): 303-319. https://doi.org/10.1002/rse2.79
  12. Everard, M.L. and J.B. Watts(2010) Have we neglected the societal importance of sand dunes? An ecosystem services perspective. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystem 20: 476-487. https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.1114
  13. Gabriela, M.G., P.C. Arely, M.F. Dalia, M. Giraldo, T.I. Edgar, E. Arancibia and R.N. Rodolfo(2021) Perceptions and social values regarding the ecosystem services of beaches and coastal dunes in Yucatan, Mexico. Sustainability 13: 3592.
  14. Gonzalez, G.M., M.L. Martinez, D. Lithgow, O. Perez-Maqueo and P. Simonin(2012) Land use change and its effects on the value of ecosystem services along the coast of the Gulf of Mexico. Ecological Economics 82: 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.07.018
  15. Han, Y.H., Y.H. Lee, J.B. Kim and K.J. Cho(2013) Vegetation characteristics of coastal sand dune in the east coast. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 16(1): 55-69. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2013.16.1.055
  16. Jeon, S.W., J.U. Kim, Y.H. Kim, H.C. Jung, W.K. Lee and J.S. Kim(2015) Improvement of forest boundary in land-cover classification map(Level-II) for functional assessment of ecosystem services. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 18(1): 127-133. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13087/kosert.2015.18.1.127
  17. Kang, Y.M., S.H. Son and K.J. Jung(2021) Special education teachers' experiences and support needs regarding Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) in special schools: A Focus Group Interview(FGI). The Journal of Special Education: Theory and Practice 22(4): 69-98. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.19049/JSPED.2021.22.4.04
  18. KangWon News(2023) https://www.kwnews.co.kr/page/view/2023080215373591985
  19. Kim, B.R., J.H. Lee, I.G. Kim, S.H. Kim and H.S. Kwon(2019) Rapid assessment of ecosystem services apply to local stakeholders. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 22(1): 1-11. (in Korean with English abstract)
  20. Kim, I.K., S.H. Kim, J.E. Lee and H.S. Kwon(2019) Categorization of cities in Gyeonggi-do using ecosystem service bundles. Journal of Environment Impact Assess 28(3): 201-214. (in Korean with English abstract)
  21. Kim, J.E. and S.K. Hong(2009) Landscape ecological analysis of coastal sand dune ecosystem in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 12(3): 21-32. (in Korean with English abstract)
  22. Kong, M.J., B.M. Lee, N.C. Kim and J.K. Son(2014) The analysis of function and factors for the value assessment of ecosystem services at rice paddy wetland. Journal of Wetlands Research 16(2): 251-259. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2014.16.2.251
  23. Lee, E.H. and C.H. Oh(2021) A study on the threat factors of biodiversity on Hasidong Anin coastal dune. Journal of the Korea Society of Environmental Restoration Technology 24(3): 99-114. (in Korean with English abstract)
  24. Lee, J.H.(2018) A study on the buffer zone setting for sustainable management of ecological and landscape conservation area. Danguk University. (in Korean with English abstract)
  25. Lee, S.J., J.W. Choi and C.H. Oh(2022) Assessment and enhancement of ecosystem services of Saemangeum Area. Korean Journal of Environment and Ecology 36(6): 684-692. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.13047/KJEE.2022.36.6.684
  26. MA(Millennium Ecosystem Assessment)(2005) Ecosystem and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC.
  27. Ministry of Environment(2009) The 1st basic management plan for Hasidong.Anin coastal dune of ecological and landscape conservation area. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea.
  28. Ministry of Environment(2014) Report of change and observation of ecosystem from 2012 to 2013. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea, pp.359-385.
  29. Ministry of Environment(2017) The 2nd basic management plan for Hasidong.Anin coastal dune of ecological and landscape conservation area. Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea.
  30. Ministry of Environment(2018) 13th Ramsar conference in Dubai-The official adopt of wetland simple assessment proposed by Korea. Natural Ecology Policy Division of Ministry of Environment.
  31. National Institute of Ecology(2017) Investigation of ecology landscape conservation area(Hasidong anin sand dune). Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea.
  32. National Institute of Ecology(2021) Investigation of ecology landscape conservation area(Hasidong anin sand dune). Ministry of Environment, Sejong, Korea.
  33. Pablo, A.V., P.C. Fernando and P.U. Jimmy(2021) Ecosystem services and uses of dune systems of the coast of the Araucania Region, Chile: A perception study. Ocean and Coastal Management 200: 105-450.
  34. Park, J.H.(2018) A study on improvement of law and policy on coal power in Korea-Analysis of the Samcheok coal power. Environmental Law and Policy 21: 101-130. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.18215/elvlp.21..201809.101
  35. Park, M.J., D.D. Jang, J.B. Jeon, J.A. Choi, C.S. Lim and E.J. Kim(2017) 7. Development of rural ecological landscape management indicator considering ecosystem services value. Journal of the Korean Society of Rural Planning 23(4): 127-141. (in Korean with English abstract)
  36. Park, M.O.(2021) A study on the evaluation of wetland ecosystem services using RAWES. Korea Institute of Garden Design 7(2): 131-143. (in Korean with English abstract)
  37. Rabiee, F.(2004) Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society 63: 655-660. https://doi.org/10.1079/PNS2004399
  38. Ramsar COP13 Doc.18.18 Rec.1. Draft resolution on the rapid assessment of wetland ecosystem.
  39. Renaud, F.G. et al.(eds.)(2016) Ecosystem-Based disaster risk reduction and adaptation in practice, advances in natural and technological hazards research 42.
  40. Roh, Y.H., C.K. Kim and H.J. Hong(2016) Time-series changes to ecosystem regulating services in Jeju. Journal of Environmental Policy and Administration 24(2): 29-44. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.15301/jepa.2016.24.2.29
  41. Seok, Y.S., K.H. Song and J.H. Chon(2014) The application of the systems thinking approach in suggesting the restoration direction of the ecological landscape protected area-Focused on the relationship between the damage causes of Hasidong.Anin coastal dune and keystone species. Journal of East Asian Landscape Studies 8(2): 43-55. (in Korean with English abstract)
  42. Shin, Y.J., S.J. Park and C.R. Park(2016) Valuation of cultural ecosystem services using the choice experiment method(CE). Journal of Korean Institute of Forest Recreation and Welfare 20(2): 65-77. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.34272/forest.2016.20.2.006
  43. Won, H.Y., C.H. Shin and H.T. Mun(2014) Valuation of ecosystem services through organic carbon distribution and cycling in the Quercus mongolica Forest at Mt. Worak National Park. Journal of Wetlands Research 16(3): 315-325. (in Korean with English abstract) https://doi.org/10.17663/JWR.2014.16.3.315