DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Elevating Key Stakeholder Roles in the Public Building Process

공공건축 조성 과정의 주요 이해관계자 역할 개선방향 연구

  • Received : 2023.09.07
  • Accepted : 2023.11.01
  • Published : 2023.11.30

Abstract

This study commences by addressing questions related to the participation of key stakeholders in the initial planning of public buildings. The objective is to determine how to enhance their role in the public building process. To achieve this, a survey was conducted involving 80 key stakeholders to identify their awareness and requirements for improvement within the existing legal and systemic framework. Furthermore, a problem within the comprehensive public building process was verified through case analysis of various public building projects. The improvement direction was subsequently derived and categorized into both the organizational and structural aspects. Nevertheless, it is important to acknowledge that this study does not present a specific plan for implementing these improvements. In the future, it will be essential to explore practical and specific action steps through institutional and policy research applicable to the domestic context.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, J. (2016, January 26). Ministry of Science, rush to open National Children's Science Museum. Break News. Retrieved from https://www.breaknews.com/425905
  2. Han, E. (2018, November 25). A 'living' Children's Science Museum made from rags. Korea Joongang Daily. Retrieved from https://www.joongang.co.kr/article/23152351#home
  3. Kwon, H. (2022, November 30). Project costs soar due to design changes. YangSan Daily. Retrieved from https://www.yangsanilbo.com/news/articleView.html?idxno=90398
  4. Lim, Y., Bang, J., Kim, J., Park, S., Yang, E., Lee, K., Lee, H., & Park, T. (2020). A strategy for National Public Building Center. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 2-18.
  5. Lim, Y., Bang, S., Park, T., & Yang, E. (2022). Rethinking architectural competitions of public buildings: Issues and challenges in the building process. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 167-177.
  6. Park, J. (2020, October 4). Korea's first Robot Science Museum was poorly designed. The Korea Economic Daily. Retrieved from https://www.hankyung.com/article/2020100424861
  7. Park, H. (2022, November 14). Left without an exit strategy, a waste of taxpayers' money. Seoul Local News. Retrieved from https://www.slnews.co.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=51290
  8. Seo, S., Kim, Y., Cho, S., Lyu, H., & Chung, J. (2011). The establishment and operation of the National Public Architecture Center. Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 22-42.
  9. Seo, S., Kim, Y., Cho, S., Lee, E., Lyu, H., & Chung, J. (2012). The establishment and operation of the National Public Architecture Center(II). Architecture & Urban Research Institute, 15-22.
  10. Shin, H. (2022). Improvements and issues regarding the public architectural planning system. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 38(4), 43-50.
  11. Shin, H., Kim, J., & Lim, Y. (2023). Implications of the open call system in the Flemish Region of Belgium. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea, 39(5), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK.2023.39.5.3
  12. Spokesman, S. (2020, October 5). Korea's first Robot Science Museum was poorly designed. The Korea Economic Daily. Retrieved from https://mediahub.seoul.go.kr/archives/1297316?tr_code=m_new01