공학교육연구 (Journal of Engineering Education Research)

  • 제26권6호
  • /
  • Pages.79-86
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1738-6454(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-8283(eISSN)
한국공학교육학회 (Korean Society for Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

효과적인 플립러닝 적용을 위한 사전 학습 영상 길이에 관한 연구

A Study on Video Length in Pre-class Homework for Effective Application of Flipped Learning

  • 박준현 (성균관대학교 기계공학부)
  • Park, Jun Hyun (School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.31
  • 심사 : 2023.11.22
  • 발행 : 2023.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

In our research, we delved into the impact of video length assigned for pre-class assignments on students' level of engagement. What we discovered is that as the length of the video increases, student engagement tends to decrease and the time allocated for homework preparation does not significantly influence engagement, as many students tend to complete their assignments just before the due date. Interestingly, the well-known "6-minute rule" often advocated for online educational videos does not align with the dynamics of real university settings. Whether in traditional lecture-based classes or flipped learning environments, students exhibit a high degree of self-responsibility when it comes to video consumption. Our findings strongly suggest that, in the context of flipped learning, it is advisable to create videos that are shorter than 15 minutes in length.

키워드

과제정보

이 논문은 2017년 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임(No. 2017R1A2B4007387)

참고문헌

  1. 김은경(2016). 데이터베이스 교과목에서 플립러닝 적용 사례. 한국정보통신학회논문지, 20(4), 847-856. https://doi.org/10.6109/JKIICE.2016.20.4.847
  2. 유경현(2022). 열역학 교과목에 대한 플립러닝 교수법 적용 사례. 공학교육연구, 25(6), 69-80. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2022.25.6.69
  3. 유재하(2017). 신호처리 교과목에 대한 플립러닝 적용사례. 실천공학교육논문지, 9(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2017.125
  4. 이성혜.김은혜 (2019). 플립러닝 기반 공학수업 개선 방안 연구-국내 C대학 공학수업 운영 사례를 중심으로. 공학교육연구, 22(2), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2019.22.2.3
  5. 이예경.윤순경(2017). 학습자의 경험을 통한 플립러닝의 재해석. 공학교육연구, 20(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2017.20.1.53
  6. 이지연(2021). 국내 공학교육에서의 플립러닝 연구에 대한 체계적 고찰. 공학교육연구, 24(3), 21-31. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2021.24.3.21
  7. 임경화.안정현(2016). 공학생의 문제해결럭 향상을 위한 질문 생성 전략 활용 플립러닝 수업 설계. 실천공학교육논문지, 9(2), 75-81.
  8. 정성희.곽민정(2018). 이공계형 플립러닝 모델이 학습자 인식, 자율성, 수업 흥미도 향상에 미치는 연구. 학습자중심교과교육 연구, 17(22), 353-376.
  9. 장희숙(2020). 플립러닝 교수법을 응용한 수치해석 수업 사례 연구. 인터넷전자상거래연구, 20(1), 117-130.
  10. 최정빈.김은경(2015). 공과대학의 Flipped Learning 교수학습 모형 개발 및 교과 운영사례. 공학교육연구, 18(2), 77-88. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2015.18.2.77
  11. 한지영(2019). '창의적문제해결방법론' 교과목의 플립러닝 수업 설계에 관한 연구. 공학교육연구, 22(1), 22-28. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2019.22.1.22
  12. 한지영(2021). 플립러닝 교수법을 통한 공과대학 학생들의 학습양식 및 선호교수법 변화의 가능성 탐색. 공학교육연구, 24(6), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2021.24.6.40
  13. Alemdag, E.(2022). Effects of instructor-present videos on learning, cognitive load, motivation, and social presence: a meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 27(9), 12713-12742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11154-w
  14. Biard, N., Cojean, S., & Jamet, E.(2018). Effects of segmentation and pacing on procedural learning by video. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 411-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.12.002
  15. Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A.(2013, June). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (pp. 23-1200).
  16. Crouch, C. H., & Mazur, E.(2001). Peer instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American journal of physics, 69(9), 970-977. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
  17. Dart, S.(2020). Khan-style video engagement in undergraduate engineering: Influence of video duration, content type and course. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Australasian Association for Engineering Education (AAEE 2020). Engineers Australia.
  18. Freeman, S. et al.(2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
  19. Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M.(2022). Improving instructional video design: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 155-183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7296
  20. Guo, P. J., Kim, J., & Rubin, R.(2014). How video production affects student engagement: An empirical study of MOOC videos. In Proceedings of the first ACM conference on Learning@ scale conference (pp. 41-50).
  21. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: a response to Kirschner, Sweller, and. Educational psychologist, 42(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368
  22. Kirschner, P., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E.(2006). Why unguided learning does not work: An analysis of the failure of discovery learning, problem-based learning, experiential learning and inquiry-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
  23. Lagerstrom, L., Johanes, P., & Ponsukcharoen, U.(2015, June), The Myth of the Six-Minute Rule: Student Engagement with Online Videos. Paper presented at 2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Seattle, Washington. 10.18260/p.24895
  24. Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F.(2017). A critical review of flipped classroom challenges in K-12 education: Possible solutions and recommendations for future research. Research and practice in technology enhanced learning, 12(1), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41039-016-0038-0
  25. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R.(2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational psychologist, 38(1), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6
  26. Mayer, R. E. et al.(2004). A personalization effect in multimedia learning: Students learn better when words are in conversational style rather than formal style. Journal of educational psychology, 96(2), 389.
  27. Nielsen, K. L.(2020). Students' video viewing habits during a flipped classroom course in engineering mathematics. Research in Learning Technology, 28, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.25304/rlt.v28.2404
  28. Polat, H.(2023). Instructors' presence in instructional videos: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8537-8569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11532-4
  29. Prince, M.(2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of engineering education, 93(3), 223-231. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2004.tb00809.x
  30. Rudolph, M.(2017). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. Journal of Online Higher Education, 1(2), 1-10.
  31. Schultz, D. et al.(2014). Effects of the flipped classroom model on student performance for advanced placement high school chemistry students. Journal of chemical education, 91(9), 1334-1339. https://doi.org/10.1021/ed400868x
  32. Slemmons, K. et al.(2018). The impact of video length on learning in a middle-level flipped science setting: implications for diversity inclusion. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27(5), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-018-9736-2