Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science (한국문헌정보학회지)

Korean Society For Library And Information Science (한국문헌정보학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Intellectual Structure of Domestic Library and Information Science Based on Co-Citation

동시인용 분석 기반 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 지적구조에 관한 연구

  • 이민희 (충남대학교 일반대학원 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 곽승진 (충남대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2023.10.26
  • Accepted : 2023.11.06
  • Published : 2023.11.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study attempted to explore the characteristics of knowledge communication and investigate important research topics and key authors by analyzing major academic papers in the field of LIS in Korea for five years from 2018 to 2022. The research method collected and analyzed papers published for five years in four key journals in the field of domestic Library and Information Science from the Korean Citation Index (KCI) database. The paper was selected to extract the author data of the paper and the data of the reference, and network visualization was performed by conducting literature co-citation analysis and author co-citation analysis using Netminer. As a result of the analysis, it was possible to derive a pair of co-citations between authors, and it was confirmed that it is important to include multiple authors in the intellectual structure analysis in the academic field through co-citation frequency analysis among researchers. The literature confirmed the correlation between the topics of the paper, and it was found that research related to Library and Information Science was centered on the topics of library, digital, user, service, and data.

본 연구는 2018년부터 2022년까지 5년간 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 주요 학술지 4종의 논문을 분석하여 지식 커뮤니케이션 특징을 탐구하고 중요한 연구 주제와 핵심 저자들을 분석하였다. 연구 방법으로 한국학술지인용색인(KCI)에서 국내 문헌정보학 분야의 핵심 학술지 4종의 5년간 발표된 논문을 수집하여 선별하여 논문의 저자 데이터와 참고문헌의 데이터를 추출하였다. Netminer를 사용하여 문헌동시인용 분석과 저자동시인용 분석을 실행하여 네트워크를 시각화하였다. 분석 결과, 저자 간의 동시인용 쌍을 도출할 수 있었으며, 연구자 간의 동시인용빈도 분석을 통해 학문 분야의 지적구조 분석에서 복수 저자를 분석 대상에 포함하는 것이 중요함을 확인하였다. 또한 키워드 분석을 통해 논문 주제 간의 상관성을 확인하였으며, 문헌정보학 관련 연구가 '도서관, 디지털, 이용자, 서비스, 데이터' 주제를 중심으로 이루어지고 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Choi, Hyung Wook, Choi, Ye-Jin, & Nam, So-Yeon (2018). Time series analysis of intellectual structure and research trend changes in the field of library and information science: 2003 to 2017. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 35(2), 89-114. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2018.35.2.089
  2. Jeong, Yoo Kyung (2020). Journal citation network analysis of library and information science field in Korea. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 54(4), 221-238. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.4.221
  3. Kim, Eun Gi (2017). A comparative analysis on keywords of international and Korean journals in library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 48(1), 207-225. http://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.1.201703.207
  4. Kim, Hyun Jung (2013). An analysis of the intellectual structure of the LIS field: using journal co-citation analysis. Journal of the Korean Biblia Society for Library and Information Science, 24(4), 99-113. https://doi.org/10.14699/kbiblia.2013.24.4.099
  5. Kim, Young Joon (2008). Study on the Changes of the Intellectual Structure of Korean Communication Studies: Author Co-citation Analysis and Author Interchange Analysis, Doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of Chungang University, Korea.
  6. Ko, Young Man, Song, Min-Sun, Kim, Bee-Yeon, & Min, Hye-Ryoung (2013). A study on the correlation between the appearance frequency of author keyword and the number of citation in the humanities and social science journal articles of the Korea Citation Index (KCI). Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.2.227
  7. Koo, Bon Jin & Chang, Durk Hyun (2023). Research on overseas trends and emerging topics in field of library and information science. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 57(3), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2023.57.3.071
  8. Lee, Jae Yun (2015). Identifying the research fronts in Korean library and information science by document co-citation analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(4), 77-106. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.4.077
  9. Lee, Jae Yun (2020). Analyzing the intellectual structure of school library researches with citation-weighted author profiling. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 54(2), 197-223. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2020.54.2.197
  10. Lee, Jong Wook & Yang, Ki Duk (2011). A bibliometric study of library and information science research in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 45(4), 53-76. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2011.45.4.053
  11. LIN MEI (2020). An Investigation on the Knowledge Communication Networks of Library and Information Science in China: Based on co-citations, Mater's thesis, The Graduate School of Yonsei University, Korea.
  12. Oh, Se-Hoon (2005). A study on the research trends of library & information science in Korea by analyzing journal articles and the cited literatures. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 22(3), 379-408. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2005.22.3.379
  13. Park, Ja-Hyun & Song, Min (2013). A study on the research trends in library & information science in Korea using topic modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007
  14. Park, Ji Yeon & Jeong, Dong Youl (2013). A study on the intellectual structure of library and information science in Korea by author bibliographic coupling analysis. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(4), 31-59. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.4.031
  15. Park, Ji Yeon (2013). A Study of the Intellectual Structure of Library and Information Science in Korea. Doctoral dissertation, The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University, Korea.
  16. Yang, Ki Duk, Kim, Seon Wook, & Lee, Hye-Kyung (2021). Comparison of research performance between domestic and international library and information science scholars. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 365-392. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.365
  17. Marin, A. & Wellman, B. (2011). Social network analysis: an introduction. The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis, 11-25.
  18. McCain, K. W. (1989). Mapping authors in intellectual space: population genetics in the 1980s. Communication Research, 16(5), 667-681. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365089016005007
  19. Small, H. & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277400400102
  20. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
  21. Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  22. White, H. D. & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: a literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for information Science, 32(3), 163-171. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630320302
  23. White, H. D. & McCain, K. W. (1989). Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 24, 119-186.
  24. Zhao, D. Z. (1993). 共引分析:硏究學科及其文獻結构和特点的一种有效方法. 情報雜志, 12(2), 36-42.