한국기록관리학회지 (Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)

  • 제23권4호
  • /
  • Pages.91-111
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1598-1487(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2671-7247(eISSN)
한국기록관리학회 (Korean Society of Archives and Records Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국내 기록분야 연구주제 분석: 2002~2023년간 기록관리학, 문헌정보학, 역사학 학술논문을 중심으로

Analysis of Research Topics in Archival Studies: Focusing on Academic Papers in Archival Science, Library and Information Science, and History from 2002 to 2023

  • 김선욱 (대구가톨릭대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • 투고 : 2023.10.16
  • 심사 : 2023.11.08
  • 발행 : 2023.11.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구의 목적은 국내 기록관리학, 문헌정보학, 역사학 학술논문의 서지정보를 분석함으로써 기록분야 연구주제를 분석하는데 있다. 이를 위해 1,173편의 학술논문을 수집한 뒤, 저자키워드 데이터로부터 네트워크 분석을 시행하고 초록 데이터로부터 토픽모델링을 진행하고 분석 결과를 시간의 흐름에 따라 정리하였다. 저자키워드로부터의 네트워크 분석 결과에 따르면, 주요 법령과 정책의 변화에 따라 연구주제 네트워크가 적극적으로 변화하는것이 확인되었다. 초록으로부터의 토픽모델링 결과에 따르면, 전체 학술논문의 주제는 '레코드매니지먼트', '아카이빙', '국가기록정책' 으로 구분된다. 2002~2009년 동안은 '레코드매니지먼트'와 '국가기록정책'이 상대적으로 우세하였으나 2009년부터 균형적인 양적 성장을 이루며 2019년에 정점을 이루었다.

This study aims to analyze research topics within the domain of archival studies by examining bibliographic information from academic papers in archival science, library and information science, and history. After collecting 1,173 academic papers, network analysis was performed based on author keyword data, topic modeling was conducted from abstract data, and the analysis results were organized over time. The network analysis results based on author keywords confirmed that the research topic network actively changed according to variations in major laws and policies. Moreover, topic modeling from the abstract showed that the subjects of the entire academic paper were divided into "Records Management," "Archiving," and "National Records Policy." Notably, from 2002 to 2009, "Records Management" and "National Records Policy" were relatively dominant, but it has achieved balanced quantitative growth since 2009, peaking in 2019.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Choi, Minwoo & Kang, Beom-mo (2008). Practice in Constructing Sejong Morph (Sense) Analysis Corpora. Korean Cultural Studies, 48, 337-372. 
  2. Choi, Yilang (2015). A Study on the Research Trends of Archival Studies in Korea : Focused on Research Papers between 2004 and 2013. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 43, 147-177. 
  3. Chung, Yeon Kyoung (2005). A Comparative Study of Graduate Level Archival Curriculum in Korea and the United States of America. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 5(2), 5-25. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2005.5.2.005 
  4. Han, Mi-kyung & Noh, Younghee (2015). An Analysis of Records Management Courses offered at the Department of Library and Information Science and Publication Trend of Records Management Articles by Library and Information Science Professors. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 15(4), 125-149. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2015.15.4.125 
  5. Jang, Hye-Li & Choi, Jae Hwang (2008). A Study on the Continuing Education Program for Records Managers. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 8(1), 123-142.  https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2008.8.1.123 
  6. Jeun, Young-Ju (2013). EMR System and Patient Medical Information Protection. The Korean Journal of Health Service Management, 7(3), 213-224. https://doi.org/10.12811/kshsm.2013.7.3.213 
  7. Kim, Gyuhwan & Nam, Young Joon (2009). A Study on the Research Trends of Records and Archives Management in Korea through an Analysis of Journal Articles. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 43(4), 217-239. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2009.43.4.217 
  8. Kim, Haklae (2022). Considerations for Applying Korean Natural Language Processing Technology in Records Management. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 22(4), 129-149. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.4.129 
  9. Kim, Heesop & Kang, Bora (2018). An Analysis of the Research Topics of the Academic Papers Published in the Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management: From 2001 to 2017. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(4), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.4.183 
  10. Kim, Seonghee & Chang, Ro-Sa (2010). The Study on the Research Trend of Social Network Analysis and the its Applicability to Information Science. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 27(4), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2010.27.4.071 
  11. Kim, SeonWook & Yang, Kiduk (2022). Topic Model Augmentation and Extension Method using LDA and BERTopic. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 39(3), 99-132.  https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2022.39.3.099 
  12. Kim, Soon-Hee (2009). A Study on a Teaching Program to Improve the Working Ability for Records Manager. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(3), 271-293.  https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.3.200909.271 
  13. Lee, Dongjoo, Yeon, Jongheum, Hwang, Inbeom & Lee, Sang-goo (2010). KKMA : A Tool for Utilizing Sejong Corpus based on Relational Database. KIISE Transactions on Computing Practices, 16(11), 1046-1050. 
  14. Lee, Hyekyung, Yang, Kiduk & Kim, SeonWook (2019). Analysis of Collaborative Research Trends in Library and Information Science in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 50(2), 191-214. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.50.2.201906.191 
  15. Lee, In-Young (2011). An Analysis of the Major Issues on Electronic Medical Records. Hanyang Law Review, 28(1), 75-98. 
  16. Lee, Jae-Yun, Moon, Ju-Young & Kim, Hee-Jung (2007). Examining the Intellectual Structure of Records Management & Archival Science in Korea with Text Mining. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 41(1), 345-372. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2007.41.1.345 
  17. Lee, Soo-Ssang (2013). Analytical Study on the Relationship between Centralities of Research Networks and Research Performances. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(3), 405-428. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.3.201309.405 
  18. Lee, Soo-Ssang (2014). A Content Analysis of Journal Articles Using the Language Network Analysis Methods. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(4), 49-68.  https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.4.049 
  19. Lee, Yong-Gu & Woo, Yunhee (2015). A Study on Analyzing Co-authorship Networks of Library and Information Science in Taiwan. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 32(2), 167-192. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2015.32.2.167 
  20. Lee, Yun-Jung & Chung, Yeon Kyoung (2021). A Comparative Study on the Curriculum of Graduate Schools of Archival Sciences in Korea and the Foreign Countries. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science, 55(1), 567-591. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2021.55.1.567 
  21. Na, Yonwhee & Park, Hee Jin (2022). A Study on the Research Trends of Archival Preservation Papers in Korea from 2000 to 2021. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 22(4), 175-196. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2022.22.4.175 
  22. Nam, Tae-Woo & Lee, Jin-Young (2009). A Study on the Research Trends of Records and Archives Management in Korea. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 40(2), 451-472. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.40.2.200906.451 
  23. National Archives of Korea (2006). Implementation of the "National Records Management Innovation Roadmap" and the roles of institutions at each level. 
  24. National Archives of Korea (2020). National records management mid- to long-term development plan (draft) for trustworthy record management - 2020~2024 -. 
  25. National Records Management Innovation T/F (2017). Innovation plan for national records management.
  26. Oh, Hang-Nyeong (2017). History and Archives: Colleagues or Strangers?. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 54, 179-210. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2017.54.179 
  27. Park, Hee Jin (2014). A Study on the Research Trends of Records and Archive Management in North America through the Review of Archivaria. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 14(4), 99-125. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2014.14.4.099 
  28. Park, Jahyun & Song, Min (2013). A Study on the Research Trends in Library & Information Science in Korea using Topic Modeling. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 30(1), 7-32. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2013.30.1.007 
  29. Park, JunHyeong & Oh, Hyo-Jung (2017). Comparison of Topic Modeling Methods for Analyzing Research Trends of Archives Management in Korea: focused on LDA and HDP. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 48(4), 235-258. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.48.4.201712.235 
  30. Park, JunHyeong, Ryu, Pum-Mo & Oh, Hyo-Jung (2018). Timeline-Based Topic Trend Analysis of Archives Management in Korea. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 18(1), 29-47. https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2018.18.1.029 
  31. Shim, SungBo (2020). Evaluation of Records and Archives Management Innovation in 2017~2020. The Korean Journal of Archival Studies, 65, 7-46. https://doi.org/10.20923/kjas.2020.65.007 
  32. Sohn, Hye In & Nam, Young Joon(2016). A Study on the Research Trends of Archives Management in Korea: Focused on the Journal of Records Management & Archives Society of Korea and The Korean Journal of Archival Studies. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 33(1), 85-110. https://doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2016.33.1.085 
  33. Song, Jung-Sook (2017). Reestablishing the Roles of the National Archives of Korea and the Branch Archives. Journal of Korean Society of Archives and Records Management, 17(4), 155-175.  https://doi.org/10.14404/JKSARM.2017.17.4.155
  34. Aouichaty, S., Maleh, Y., Hajami, A. & Allali, H. (2023). Automated decision classification model for tax appeals commission in Morocco using latent dirichlet allocation. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 31(3), 1811-1820. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijeecs.v31.i3.pp1811-1820 
  35. Beauchamp, M. A. (1965). An improved index of centrality. Behavioral Science, 10(2), 161-163. https://doi.org/10.1002/bs.3830100205 
  36. Benoit, E. & Force, D. C. (2019). One Size Does Not Fit All: Graduate Archival Education in the Twenty-First Century. The American Archivist, 82(1), 24 52. https://doi.org/10.17723/0360-9081-82.1.24
  37. Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y. & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research, 3(Jan), 993-1022. 
  38. Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social networks, 29(4), 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2007.04.002 
  39. Brandes, U. (2001). A faster algorithm for betweenness centrality. The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 25(2), 163-177. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.2001.9990249 
  40. Cao, L. & Ren, J. (2022). Machine learning shows that the Covid-19 pandemic is impacting US public companies unequally by changing risk structures. Plos one, 17(6), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269582 
  41. Cox, R. J. (2009). Unpleasant things: teaching advocacy in archival education programs. InterActions: UCLA Journal of Education and Information Studies, 5(1), https://doi.org/10.5070/D451000643 
  42. Freeman, L. C. (1978). Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215-239 https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 
  43. Grootendorst, M. (2022). BERTopic: Neural topic modeling with a class-based TF-IDF procedure. arXiv. Available: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2203.05794 
  44. Sabidussi, G. (1966). The centrality index of a graph. Psychometrika, 31(4), 581-603. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289527