DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Impact of Image Type and Brand Familiarity on the Effectiveness of Bundling

  • Sungmi Lee (Division of Advertising, PR & Visual Communication, Hanshin University)
  • Received : 2023.08.26
  • Accepted : 2023.09.09
  • Published : 2023.11.30

Abstract

Bundling has become a general promotion strategy in mobile shopping context. Previous research on bundling has mostly focused on bundle frame or price frame. Even though consumers are searching and purchasing the product in mobile channels, little research has investigated the effects of bundling in mobile shopping. The objectives of this study is to examine how different product image of bundle affects consumer's perception and purchase intention differently, and how brand familiarity moderate this influence. A sample of 140 subjects participated in a within-subjects experiment. A bundling composed of two different product image (a single product vs. bundled products) was evaluated by individuals. Brand familiarity (familiar brand vs. unfamiliar brand) were manipulated to test a set of hypotheses. We found that the effectiveness of bundling does not depend on the type of product image and brand familiarity. The findings of our study provide some implications for researchers and marketers. Although there have been studies on the effects of bundle framing on consumer behavior, we suggest new insights regarding bundling based on product image and mobile shopping context.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the research grant of Hanshin University in 2023.

References

  1. How To Use Price Bundling To Optimize Pricing and Boost Sales. https://www.profitwell.com.
  2. Bakos, Y. and E. Brynjolfsson, "Bundling and Competition on the Internet," Marketing Science, Vol.19, pp. 63-82, Mar 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.19.1.63.15182
  3. Hitt, L. and P. Chen, "Bundling with Customer Self-Selection: A Simple Approach to Bundling Low-Marginal-Cost Goods," Management Science, Vol.51, No.10, pp.1481-1493, Oct 2005. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0403
  4. Goh, K. and B. Jesse, "The Framing Effects of Multipart Pricing on Consumer Purchasing Behavior of Customized Information Good Bundles," Information Systems Research, Vol.24, No.2, pp.344-351.Jul 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0428
  5. Overmars, S. and K. Poels, "Online Product Experiences: The Effect of Simulating Stroking Gestures on Product Understanding and the Critical Role of User Control," Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.51, pp. 272-284.Oct 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.04.033
  6. Sinha, I. and M. Smith, "Consumers' Perceptions of Promotional Framing of Price," Psychology & Marketing, Vol.17, No.3, pp.257-275. Feb 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200003)17:3<257::AID-MAR4>3.0.CO;2-P
  7. Soman, D. and J. Gourville, "Transaction Decoupling: How Price Bundling Affects the Decision to Consume," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, No.1, pp. 30-44. Feb 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.38.1.30.18828
  8. Stremersch, S. and G. Tellis, "Strategic Bundling of Products and Prices: A New Synthesis for Marketing," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 66, No.1, pp. 55-72. Jan 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.66.1.55.18455
  9. Harlam, B. , A. Krishna, D. Lehmann, and C. Mela, "Impact of Bundle Type, Price Framing and Familiarity on Purchase Intention for the Bundle," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 33, No.1, pp. 57-66. May 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(94)00014-6
  10. Mitchell, A. and J. Olson, "Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol.18, No.3, pp. 318-332.Aug 1981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3150973
  11. Djamasbi, S., M. Siegel, and T. Tullis, "Visual Hierarchy and Viewing Behavior: An Eye Tracking Study," In: Jacko, J.A. (eds) Human-Computer Interaction. Design and Development Approaches. HCI 2011. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6761. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21602-2_36
  12. Fazio, R., M. Powell, and C. Williams, "The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.15, No.3, pp.280-288. Dec 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/209214
  13. Goldsmith, E., A. Lafferty, and J. Newell, "The Impact of Corporate Credibility and Celebrity Credibility on Consumer Reaction to Advertisements and Brands," Journal of Advertising, Vol. 29, No.3, pp.43-54. May 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2000.10673616
  14. Y. J. Kim, "Effects of Advertisement Acceptance According to Brand Familiarity on Ease of Imitation and Behavioral Intention of Mobile Payment," Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp.48-58. April 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.4.048