The Journal of Korean Physical Therapy

  • 제35권5호
  • /
  • Pages.139-144
  • /
  • 2023
  • /
  • 1229-0475(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2287-156X(eISSN)
대한물리치료학회 (The Korean Society of Physical Therapy)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development of a Questionnaire on the Use of Outcome Measures by Korean Physical Therapists Using Focus Group Interview-Based Cognitive Interviewing

  • Jae Hyun Lim (Department of Physical Therapy, Nambu University) ;
  • Se Ju Park (Department of Rehabilitation, Songwon University) ;
  • Sung Hwan Park (Department of Physical Therapy, Nambu University) ;
  • Ho Jin Jeong (Goodbody Sling Exercise Center)
  • 투고 : 2023.09.15
  • 심사 : 2023.10.10
  • 발행 : 2023.10.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Purpose: This study developed a Korean sentiment questionnaire by adapting an existing English survey using focus group interview (FGI)-based cognitive interview (CI) techniques to investigate the utilization of outcome measures (OMs) among Korean physical therapists. Methods: The existing OMs survey questionnaire was adapted by dividing eight physical therapists into two groups: mid-experienced (n=4) and high-experienced (n=4). Each group participated in a 120-minute FGI-based CI session. All interviews were recorded, and the researcher transcribed the data immediately after each interview. The data were then organized and categorized into themes using Excel 2021 and verified with the participants. Results: FGI-based CI sessions were conducted with Korean physical therapists to revise the English version of the questionnaire, tailoring it to the local context. Four main themes emerged from the interviews: inappropriate items or translations, questionnaire length and organization, questionnaire improvements, and additional items. The questionnaire was revised based on the feedback obtained during these interviews. Conclusion: The questionnaire was modified according to the themes derived from the interviews. The questionnaire was developed to represent the clinical environment of Korean physical therapy accurately by removing elements of the questionnaire unsuitable for the Korean sentiment and incorporating the perspectives of Korean physical therapists.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Mehta S, Grafton K. A survey on the use of outcome measures by musculoskeletal physiotherapist's in India. Physiother Theory Pract. 2014; 30(2):110-22. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2013.826313
  2. Willis G, Royston P, Bercini D. The use of verbal report methods in the development and testing of survey questionnaires. Appl Cogn Psychol. 1991;5:251-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050307
  3. Knafl K, Deatrick J, Gallo A et al. The analysis and interpretation of cognitive interviews for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 2007; 30:224-34. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20195
  4. Farmer N, Powell-Wiley TM, Middleton KR et al. Use of a focus group-based cognitive interview methodology to validate a cooking behavior survey among African-American adults. Front Nutr. 2002;9:1000258.
  5. Maher CG, Latimer J, Costa LO. The relevance of cross-cultural adaptation and clinimetrics for physical therapy instruments. Braz J Phys Ther. 2007;11(4):245-52. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-35552007000400002
  6. Wallen GR, Feldman RH, Anliker J. Cognitive interviews conducted in Spanish: a method for enhancing a hispanic infant feeding questionnaire. Hispanic Health Care Int. 2002;1(2):91-6.
  7. Ward H, Atkins J. From their lives: a manual on how to conduct focus groups of low-income parents. Sacramento, CA: University of Southern Maine, 2002.
  8. Wallen GR, Saygbe JN, Brooks AT et al. Engaging community leaders in the development of a cardiovascular health behavior survey using focus group-based cognitive interviewing. Health Serv Insights. 2017;10: 1178632917701123.
  9. Jette AM, Haley SM. Contemporary measurement techniques for rehabilitation outcomes assessment. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:339-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970500302793
  10. Antunes B, Harding R, Higginson IJ, Euroimpact. Implementing patient-reported outcome measures in palliative care clinical practice: a systematic review of facilitators and barriers. Palliat Med. 2014;28(2):158-75. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216313491619
  11. Stevens JA, Beurskens AJ. Implementation of measurement instruments in physical therapist practice: development of a tailored strategy. Phys Ther. 2010;90(6):953-61. https://doi.org/10.2522/ptj.20090105
  12. Meadows K. Cognitive interviewing methodologies. Clin Nurs Res. 2021; 30(4):375-9. https://doi.org/10.1177/10547738211014099
  13. Wedge FM, Braswell-Christy J, Brown CJ et al. Factors influencing the use of outcome measures in physical therapy practice. Physiother Theory Pract. 2012;28(2):119-33. https://doi.org/10.3109/09593985.2011.578706
  14. Al-Muqiren TN, Al-Eisa ES, Alghadir AH et al. Implementation and use of standardized outcome measures by physical therapists in saudi arabia: barriers, facilitators and perceptions. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17(1):748.
  15. MacDermid JC, Walton DM, Cote P et al. Use of outcome measures in managing neck pain: an international multidisciplinary survey. Open Orthop J. 2013;7:506-20. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001307010506
  16. Swinkels RA, van Peppen RP, Wittink H et al. Current use and barriers and facilitators for implementation of standardised measures in physical therapy in the netherlands. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:106.
  17. Alreni ASE, McRobert C, McLean SM. Utilisation of outcome measures in the management of non-specific neck pain: a national survey of current physiotherapy practice in the UK. Musculoskelet Sci Pract. 2021;52: 102347.
  18. Renteria C, Berg K. Colombian Physiotherapists' use of functional outcome measures in their practice. Physiother Can. 2019;71(3):239-49. https://doi.org/10.3138/ptc.2018-31
  19. Meehan T, McCombes S, Hatzipetrou L et al. Introduction of routine outcome measures: staff reactions and issues for consideration. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2006;13:531-87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2850.2006.00985.x
  20. Morgan DL, Krueger RA, King JA. Focus group Kit. Vols 1-6. London, Sage, 1997.
  21. Eser HY, Inan MY, Kucuker MU et al. Development, validity and reliability of the 4-point likert turkish version of cognitive failures questionnaire. Ann Med Res. 2020;27(6):1650-6. https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2020.04.308
  22. Chyung SY, Roberts K, Swanson I et al. Evidence-based survey design: the use of a midpoint on the Likert scale. Performance Improvement. 2017;56(10):15-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21727
  23. Willis G, Lawrence D, Hartman A et al. Translation of a tobacco survey into spanish and asian languages: the tobacco use supplement to the current population survey. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(6):1075-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/14622200802087572
  24. Willis GB. Cognitive interviewing and questionnaire design: a training manual. Hyattsville, Maryland: US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. 1994.
  25. Park HJ, YI CH, Cho SH et al. Physical therapist's understanding and the usage of assessment tools for childeren with delayed development and cerebral palsy. Phys Ther Korea. 2000;7(1):1-21. https://doi.org/10.12674/ptk.2014.21.1.001
  26. Seo YL, Rhie SJ. Clinical experience and perception of professionalism - a focus group study with pediatric physiotherapist. Journal of Special Education & Rehabilitation Science. 2018;57(2):293-320. https://doi.org/10.23944/Jsers.2018.06.57.2.14
  27. Kim HJ, Kim CN. Review of literatures on focus group method in qualitative Study. Keimyung Journal of Nursing Science. 2001;5(1):1-21.