Journal of Korea Trade

Korea Trade Research Association (한국무역학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Localized Knowledge Spillovers and Organizational Capabilities: Evidence from the Canadian Manufacturing Sector

  • Joung-Yeo No (Department of Commerce and Finance, Kookmin University)
  • Received : 2023.05.18
  • Accepted : 2023.08.11
  • Published : 2023.10.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose - This study empirically investigates how the effects of localized knowledge spillovers on technology adoption are conditional on the organizational capabilities of potential adopters. Design/methodology - The empirical model utilized in this study examines how the presence of prior adopters of advanced manufacturing technologies affects a plant's technology adoption decision differently based on its organizational capabilities, measured by plant size and plant status (single-plant firm vs. multi-plant firm). Moreover, this study investigates how the scope of knowledge spillovers from prior adopters, both in terms of geographical and functional proximities, differ for plants with different organizational capabilities. Findings - The main findings of this study are as follows: 1. Although plants with lower organizational capabilities are less likely to adopt advanced technologies, such plants receive greater marginal benefits from knowledge spillovers from prior adopters in their region. 2. Plants with greater organizational capabilities can benefit from knowledge spillovers from a wider set of prior adopters. In other words, while plants with lower organizational capabilities tend to benefit from knowledge spillovers from "similar" and "local" adopters, plants with greater organizational capabilities can also benefit from knowledge spillovers from "not-too-similar" or are geographically distant prior adopters. Originality/value - While existing studies mainly focus on the effects of the various kinds of regional agglomeration, few studies investigate localized knowledge spillovers in technology adoption. Moreover, no prior studies have explored how the effects of knowledge spillovers on technology adoption depend on a plant's organizational capabilities and how the scope of knowledge spillovers differs for plants with different organizational capabilities. This study is the first to empirically investigate this topic.

Keywords

References

  1. The Annual Survey of Manufactures (1983-1993), Statistics Canada.
  2. Audretsch, D. and M. Feldman (1996), "R&D Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production," The American Economic Review 86: 630-640.
  3. Bresnahan, T. and M. Trajtenberg (1995), "General Purpose Technologies: engines of Growth?" Journal of Econometrics 65: 83-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)01598-T
  4. Case, Anne (1992), "Neighborhood Influence and Technological Change," Regional Science and Urban Economics 22 (4): 491-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(92)90041-X
  5. Cohen, W.M. and D.A. Levinthal (1990), "Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation," Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 128-152. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393553
  6. Clohessy, T. and T. Acton (2019), "Investigating the Influence of Organizational Factors on Blockchain Adoption: An Innovation Theory Perspective", Industrial Management & Data Systems, 119(7): 1457-1491. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-08-2018-0365
  7. Ellison, G. and E.L. Glaeser (1997), "Geographic Concentration in US Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach," Journal of Political Economy 105: 889-927. https://doi.org/10.1086/262098
  8. Feldman, M.P. and D.B. Audretsch (1999), "Innovation in Cities: Science-based Diversity, Specialization and Localized Competition," European Economic Review 42: 409-429. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0014-2921(98)00047-6
  9. Harrison, B., M.R. Kelley, and J. Gant (1996), "Innovative Firm Behavior and Local Milieu: Exploring the Intersection of Agglomeration, Firm Effects, and Technological Change," Economic Geography 62: 233-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/144400
  10. Helpman, E. and M. Trajtenberg (1998), "Diffusion of General Purpose Technologies," General Purpose Technologies and Economic Growth, Helpman (ed.), MIT Press.
  11. Hameed M.A., S. Counsell, and S. Swift (2012), "A meta-analysis of relationships between organizational characteristics and IT innovation adoption in organizations", Information & Management, 49(5): 218-232.
  12. Jaffe, A., M. Trajtenberg, and R. Henderson (1993), "Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citation," Quarterly Journal of Economics 108 (3): 577-598. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118401
  13. Kelley, M.R. (1993), "Organizational Resources and the Industrial Environment: The Importance of Firm Size and Interfirm Linkages to the Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technology," International Journal of Technology Management 8:33-68.
  14. Kelley, M.R. and S. Helper. February (1996), "Firm Size and Capabilities, Regional Agglomeration, and the Adoption of New Technology," Working paper. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Industrial Performance Centre.
  15. Krugman, P. (1991a), "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," The Journal of Political Economy, 99(3): 483-499. https://doi.org/10.1086/261763
  16. Krugman, P. (1991b), Geography and Trade. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
  17. Laik, V.S. and J.L. Guynes (1997), "An assessment of the influence of organizational characteristics on information technology adoption decision: a discriminative approach", IEEE transactions on engineering Management, 44(2): 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1109/17.584923
  18. Marshall, A. (1920), Principles of Economics. New York: Macmillan.
  19. No, Joung-Yeo (2005), Knowledge Spillovers in the Adoption of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies (Doctoral Dissertation), Toronto: University of Toronto.
  20. Porter, M. (1998), On Competition. Harvard Business Review Book Series. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  21. Powell, W.W. and P. Brantley (1992), "Competitive Cooperation in Biotechnology: Learning Through Networks?" In networks and Organizations: Structure, Form, and Action, ed. N. Nohria and R. G. Eccles: 366-94. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  22. Salaheldin, I. (2007), "The Impact of Organizational characteristics on AMT adoption: A study of Egyptian manufacturers", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 18(4): 443-460. https://doi.org/10.1108/17410380710743806
  23. Saxenian, A. (1994), Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.
  24. Saxenian, A. (1996), "Inside-Out: Regional Networks and Industrial Adaptation in Silicon Valley and Route 128," Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research 2 (2): 41-60.
  25. 1993 Survey of Innovation and Advanced Technology (1993), Statistics Canada.
  26. Von Hippel (1988), The Sources of Innovation. Oxford; Oxford University Press.