International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Evaluation of CPU And RAM Performance for Markerless Augmented Reality

  • Tagred A. Alkasmy (Department of Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah) ;
  • Rehab K. Qarout (Department of Computer Science & Artificial Intelligence, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah) ;
  • Kaouther Laabidi (Department of Computer Engineering and Networks, College of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Jeddah)
  • Received : 2023.10.05
  • Published : 2023.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Augmented Reality (AR) is an emerging technology and a vibrant field, it has become common in application development, especially in smartphone applications (mobile phones). The AR technology has grown increasingly during the past decade in many fields. Therefore, it is necessary to determine the optimal approach to building the final product by evaluating the performance of each of them separately at a specific task. In this work we evaluated overall CPU and RAM performance for several types of Markerless Augmented Reality applications by using a multiple-objects in mobile development. The results obtained are show that the objects with fewer number of vertices performs steady and not oscillating. Object was superior to the rest of the others is sphere, which is performs better values when processed, its values closer to the minimum CPU and RAM usage.

Keywords

References

  1. Ciro A., Franco M., Damian A, Guillermo L. and David C., 2021. CPU and RAM Performance Assessment for Different Marker Types in Augmented Reality Applications. 
  2. Baek, A. R., Lee, K., & Choi, H., 2013. CPU and GPU parallel processing for mobile augmented reality. 
  3. Konstantin S. S., Alexey A. G., 2016. Analysis of CPU Usage Data Properties and their possible impact on Performance Monitoring. 
  4. Qiao, X., Ren, P., Dustdar, S., & Chen, J., 2018. A new era for web AR with mobile edge computing. 
  5. Alexandru G., Alexandru O., and Nicolae T.,2013. A Marker-Based Augmented Reality System for Mobile Devices. 
  6. Nor F. S., Dayang R. A., 2021. A review of augmented reality systems and their effects on mental workload and task performance. 
  7. Su C., Xu W., Feng-Kuang C., 2014. A case study of Augmented Reality simulation system application in a chemistry course. 
  8. Jack C.P., Keyu C., Weiwei C., 2017. Comparison Of Marker-Based AR And Markerless AR: A Case Study on Indoor Decoration System. 
  9. D.W.F. van Krevelen and R. Poelman, 2010. A Survey of Augmented Reality Technologies, Applications and Limitations. 
  10. Mehdi M., Andr'e L.,2014. Augmented Reality: Applications, Challenges and Future Trends.] 
  11. Huixiang C., Yuting D., Hao M., Yilun C., Tao L., 2018. Understanding the Characteristics of Mobile Augmented Reality Applications. 
  12. Dimitris C., Carlos B., Zhanpeng H., Pan H., 2016. Mobile Augmented Reality Survey: From Where We Are to Where We Go. 
  13. Technologies, U. Unity. Unity. Retrieved from https://unity.com/. 
  14. Vuforia Developer Portal |. Developer.vuforia.com. Retrieved from https://developer.vuforia.com/.