International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security

International Journal of Computer Science & Network Security (국제컴퓨터통신보호논문지학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Framework for Implementing Information Systems Integration to Optimize Organizational Performance

  • Ali Sirageldeen Ahmed (Department of Computer Information Systems Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, AL-Baha University)
  • Received : 2023.10.05
  • Published : 2023.10.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The primary aim of this study is to investigate the influence of Service Provider Quality (SPQ), System Quality (SQ), Information Quality (IQ), and Training Quality (TQ) on the interconnected aspect of organizational performance known as growth and development (GD). The study examined the influence of information systems (IS) on organisational performance and provided a theory-based technique for conducting research. The theoretical foundation for this study is derived from the widely employed [1]. IS success model in information systems research. The study's framework incorporates several novel elements, drawn from a comprehensive review of both recent and earlier literature, which researchers have utilized to evaluate the dimensions of [1]. In this study, we collected data from a diverse group of 348 individuals representing various industries through a web-based questionnaire. The collected data were subjected to analysis using SPSS. We conducted a multiple regression analysis involving 15 factors to assess several hypotheses regarding the relationship between the independent construct IS effectiveness and the dependent construct organizational performance. Several noteworthy descriptive statistics emerged, which hold significance for management. The study's findings strongly indicate that information systems exert a significant and beneficial influence on organizational performance. To sustain and continually enhance organizational effectiveness, the study recommends that managers periodically scrutinize and assess their information systems.

Keywords

References

  1. DeLone WH, McLean ER. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research. 1992;3(1):60-95. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.3.1.60
  2. Hooper P, Page J. Organizing information & data flows in business systems. National Public Accountant. 1997;42(9):9-1
  3. Fisher B, Kenny R. Introducing a business information system into an engineering company. Information Knowledge Systems Management. 2000;2(2):207-21.
  4. Davis GB, Olson MH. Management information systems: Conceptual foundations, structure, and development: McGraw-Hill, Inc.; 1984.
  5. Avgerou C. Information systems: what sort of science is it? Omega. 2000;28(5):567-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(99)00072-9
  6. Triplett JE, Bosworth BP, editors. Productivity in the services sector. presentation at the American Economic Association meetings, January; 2000.
  7. Swierczek FW, Shrestha PK. Information technology and productivity: a comparison of Japanese and Asia-Pacific banks. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 2003;14(2):269-88.
  8. Symons VJ. Impacts of information systems: four perspectives. Information and Software Technology. 1991;33(3):181-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-5849(91)90132-U
  9. Van der Heijden H. User acceptance of hedonic information systems. MIS quarterly. 2004:695-704.
  10. Baskerville RL, Myers MD. Information systems as a reference discipline. MIS quarterly. 2002:1-14.
  11. Hamilton S, Chervany NL. Evaluating information system effectiveness-Part I: Comparing evaluation approaches. MIS quarterly. 1981:55-69.
  12. Kirby J. Toward a theory of high performance. Harvard business review. 2005;83(7):30-9, 190.
  13. Yamin S, Gunasekaran A, Mavondo FT. Relationship between generic strategies, competitive advantage and organizational performance: an empirical analysis. Technovation. 1999;19(8):507-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(99)00024-3
  14. Chakravarthy BS. Measuring strategic performance. Strategic management journal. 1986;7(5):437-58. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070505
  15. Young-Harry DL, Oparanma AO, Ejo-Orusa HA. Management information system and organizational performance of Seven-Up Bottling Company in Aba and Port Harcourt. International Journal of Economics and Business Management. 2018;4(4):53-61.
  16. Abdulhabib AAA, Al-Dhaafri HS. The moderating role of training on the relationship between strategy management, information technology management and organisational performance of Sharjah Police. PEOPLE: Internafional Journal of Social Sciences. 2019;5(1):866-86. https://doi.org/10.20319/pijss.2019.51.866886
  17. Sinulingga M, Djati P, Thamrin S, Saragi HJR, Riyadi BS, Ubayanto T. Antecedents and Consequences of Smart Management Information System for Supervision to Improve Organizational Performance. International Journal of Membrane Science and Technology. 2023;10(2):816-24. https://doi.org/10.15379/ijmst.v10i2.1262
  18. Bharati P, Chaudhary A. Product customization on the web: an empirical study of factors impacting choiceboard user satisfaction. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ). 2006;19(2):69-81. https://doi.org/10.4018/irmj.2006040105
  19. Po-An Hsieh JJ, Wang W. Explaining employees' extended use of complex information systems. Taylor & Francis; 2007. p. 216-27.
  20. Klein R. An empirical examination of patient-physician portal acceptance. European Journal of Information Systems. 2007;16:751-60. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000719
  21. Bradley RV, Pridmore JL, Byrd TA. Information systems success in the context of different corporate cultural types: an empirical investigation. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2006;23(2):267-94. https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230211
  22. Wixom BH, Todd PA. A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information systems research. 2005;16(1):85-102. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1050.0042
  23. Gorla N, Somers TM, Wong B. Organizational impact of system quality, information quality, and service quality. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems. 2010;19(3):207-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2010.05.001
  24. Chang JC-J, King WR. Measuring the performance of information systems: A functional scorecard. Journal of Management Information Systems. 2005;22(1):85-115.
  25. Kahn BK, Strong DM, Wang RY. Information quality benchmarks: product and service performance. Communications of the ACM. 2002;45(4):184-92. https://doi.org/10.1145/505248.506007
  26. Pitt LF, Watson RT, Kavan CB. Service quality: a measure of information systems effectiveness. MIS quarterly. 1995:173-87.
  27. DeLone WH, McLean ER. The DeLone and McLean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of management information systems. 2003;19(4):9-30. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2003.11045748
  28. Thong JYL, Yap C-S. Information systems effectiveness: A user satisfaction approach. Information Processing & Management. 1996;32(5):601-10.
  29. Gefen D. It Is Not Enough to Be Responsive: The Role Of. Database. 2000;31(2):65.
  30. Amoako-Gyampah K. Perceived usefulness, user involvement and behavioral intention: an empirical study of ERP implementation. Computers in human behavior. 2007;23(3):1232-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.12.002
  31. Amoako-Gyampah K, Salam AF. An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment. Information & management. 2004;41(6):731-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2003.08.010
  32. Hair JF, Black, W.C., Babin, B.J. and Anderson, R.E. . Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th Edition ed. New York: Pearson; 2010.
  33. Tabachnick BG, & Fidell, L. S. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th, editor. New York: Allyn and Bacon; 2007.